William Herbert Page

Publications

• The Microsoft Litigation’s Lessons for <em>United States v. Google</em>
  77 U. MIAMI L. REV. 319 (2023) · University of Miami Law Review · 2023

• Parker v. Brown, The Eleventh Amendment, and Anticompetitive State Regulation
  60 WM. & MARY L. REV. 1465 (2019) · William & Mary Law Review · 2019

• The Gary Dinners and the Meaning of Concerted Action
  62 SMU L. REV. 597 (2009) · SMU Law Review · 2009
• Bargaining in the Shadow of the European Microsoft Decision: The Microsoft-Samba Protocol License (Part II)
  Northwestern University Law Review · 2008
• Bargaining in the Shadow of the European Microsoft Decision: The Microsoft-Samba Protocol License
  Northwestern University Law Review · 2008
• Communication and Concerted Action
  38 LOY. U. CHI. L.J. 405 (2007) · Loyola University Chicago Law Journal · 2007
• Software Development as an Antitrust Remedy: Lessons from the Enforcement of the Microsoft Communications Protocol Licensing Requirement
  14 MICH. TELECOMM. & TECH. L. REV. 77 (2007) · Michigan Telecommunications & Technology Law Review · 2007
• Economic Authority and the Limits of Expertise in Antitrust Cases
  90 CORNELL L. REV. 617 (2005) · Cornell Law Review · 2005
• Internet Regulation and Consumer Welfare: Innovation, Speculation, and Cable Bundling
  52 UC L.J. 891 (2001) · UC Law Journal · 2001

• Foreword: Reconsiderations of Director and Levi's Law and the Future
  17 MISS. COLL. L. REV. (1997) · Mississippi College Law Review · 1997
• Posner's Program for the Antitrust Division: A Twenty-Five Year Perspective
  48 SMU L. REV. 1713 (1995) · SMU Law Review · 1995
• "Speculative" Antitrust Damages
  70 WASH. L. REV. 423 (1995) · Washington Law Review · 1995
• Controlling the Competitor Plaintiff in Antitrust Litigation
  91 MICH. L. REV. 111 (1992) · Michigan Law Review · 1992
• Optimal Antitrust Penalties and Competitors' Injury
  88 MICH. L. REV. 2151 (1990) · Michigan Law Review · 1990

• The Chicago School and the Evolution of Antitrust: Characterization, Antitrust Injury, and Evidentiary Sufficiency
  75 VA. L. REV. 1221 (1989) · Virginia Law Review · 1989
• Interest Groups, Antitrust, and State Regulation: Parker v. Brown in the Economic Theory of Legislation
  36 DUKE L.J. 618 (1987) · Duke Law Journal · 1987
• The Place of Law and Literature
  39 VAND. L. REV. 391 (1986) · Vanderbilt Law Review · 1986
• Foreword: The Law and Southern Literature
  4 MISS. COLL. L. REV. (1984) · Mississippi College Law Review · 1984
• The Legitimacy of Judicial Rulemaking: A Reply to Professor Herbert
  3 MISS. COLL. L. REV. (1982) · Mississippi College Law Review · 1982
• Constitutionalism and Judicial Rulemaking: Lessons from the Crisis in Mississippi
  3 MISS. COLL. L. REV. (1982) · Mississippi College Law Review · 1982
• Antitrust Damages and Economic Efficiency: An Approach to Antitrust Injury
  47 U. CHI. L. REV. (1980) · University of Chicago Law Review · 1980

• Bank Mergers and Potential Competition after Marine Bancorporation: The Role of Regulatory Entry Barriers
  5 N. M. L. REV. 139 (1974) · New Mexico Law Review · 1974
• Labor Law--Civil Rights--Invidious Discrimination by Employer Does Not Per Se Violate N.L.R.A.
  4 N. M. L. REV. 261 (1974) · New Mexico Law Review · 1974

• Review of <i>Handbook of Anglo-American Legal History</i> by Max Radin
  4 U. CHI. L. REV. (1937) · University of Chicago Law Review · 1937
• Review Article
  43 HARV. L. REV. 984 (1930) · Harvard Law Review · 1930

• Review Article
  40 HARV. L. REV. 1024 (1927) · Harvard Law Review · 1927
• Review Article
  36 HARV. L. REV. 115 (1922) · Harvard Law Review · 1922
• Development of the Doctrine of Impossibility of Performance
  18 MICH. L. REV. 589 (1920) · Michigan Law Review · 1920

• Review Article
  19 HARV. L. REV. 312 (1906) · Harvard Law Review · 1906
• Review Article
  6 COLUM. L. REV. 129 (1906) · Columbia Law Review · 1906
• Review Article
  4 MICH. L. REV. 331 (1906) · Michigan Law Review · 1906
• Review Article
  15 YALE L.J. 108 (1905) · Yale Law Journal · 1905
• Review Article
  2 COLUM. L. REV. 426 (1902) · Columbia Law Review · 1902
• Review Article
  1 MICH. L. REV. 161 (1902) · Michigan Law Review · 1902