W. William Hodes

Publications

• See Something; Say Something: Model Rule 8.4(g) is not OK
  50 HOFSTRA L. REV. (2022) · Hofstra Law Review · 2022

• Navigating Some Deep and Troubled Jurisprudential Waters: Lawyer–Expert Witnesses and the Twin Dangers of Disguised Testimony and Disguised Advocacy
  6 ST. MARY'S J. LEGAL MAL. & ETHICS 180 (2016) · St. Mary's Journal on Legal Malpractice & Ethics · 2016

• Cheating Clients with the Percentage-of-the-Gross Contigent Fee Scam
  30 HOFSTRA L. REV. (2002) · Hofstra Law Review · 2002
• Truthfulness and Honesty among American Lawyers: Perception, Reality, and the Professional Reform Initiative
  53 S. C. L. REV. (2002) · South Carolina Law Review · 2002

• Lord Brougham, the Dream Team, and Jury Nullification of the Third Kind
  67 U. COLO. L. REV. 1075 (1996) · University of Colorado Law Review · 1996
• What Ought to be Done—What Can Be Done—When the Wrong Person is in Jail or about to Be Executed: An Invitation to a Multi-Disciplined Inquiry, and a Detour about Law School Pedagogy
  29 LOY. L. A. L. REV. 1547 (1996) · Loyola of Los Angeles Law Review · 1996
• The Overtly "Political" Character of the Advise and Consent Function: Offsetting the Presidential Veto with Senatorial Rejection
  7 J. CIV. RTS. & ECON. DEV. (1995) · Journal of Civil Rights and Economic Development · 1995

• The Code of Professional Responsibility, The Kutak Rules, and the Trial Lawyer's Code: Surprisingly, Three Peas in a Pod
  35 U. MIAMI L. REV. 739 (1981) · University of Miami Law Review · 1981