Victor G. Rosenblum

Publications

• A Pertinent Message for Today from Key Constitutional and Administrative Rulings of Yesterday
  40 SAN DIEGO L. REV. 1533 (2003) · San Diego Law Review · 2003
• Was the Third Circuit Off Base in Failing to Accord Chevron Deference to Social Security Administration's Interpretation of the Statute's Definition of Disability?
  22 J. NAT'L ASS'N ADMIN. L. JUD. (2002) · Journal of the National Association of Administrative Law Judiciary · 2002
• The Right to Cross-Examine Physicians in Social Security Disability Cases
  20 J. NAT'L ASS'N ADMIN. L. JUD. (2000) · Journal of the National Association of Administrative Law Judiciary · 2000

• The Right to Cross-Examine Physicians in Social Security Disability Cases
  26 FLA. ST. U. L. REV. 1049 (1999) · Florida State University Law Review · 1999
• Toward Heightening Impartiality in Social Security Agency Proceedings Involving Administrative Law Judges
  18 J. NAT'L ASS'N ADMIN. L. JUD. (1998) · Journal of the National Association of Administrative Law Judiciary · 1998
• Panel Discussion, International Trade Organization: Economic Trends of an International Court of Justice Contrasting the Proposed ITO Arbitration Mechanisms With the Bilateral GATT Negotiations and Related Issues
  14 N. ILL. U. L. REV. 471 (1994) · Northern Illinois University Law Review · 1994
• Afterword: Vision and Progress in International Trade
  14 N. ILL. U. L. REV. 547 (1994) · Northern Illinois University Law Review · 1994

• The Development of the Doctrine of Primary Jurisdiction
  16 TRANSP. L.J. 106 (1987) · Transportation Law Journal · 1987
• Book Review
  62 CHI.-KENT. L. REV. 345 (1986) · Chicago-Kent Law Review · 1986
• CONTEXTS AND CONTENTS OF "FOR GOOD CAUSE" AS CRITERION FOR REMOVAL OF ADMINISTRATIVE LAW JUDGES: LEGAL AND POLICY FACTORS
  6 W. NEW ENG. L. REV. 593 (1984) · Western New England Law Review · 1984

• On Davis on Confining, Structuring, and Checking Administrative Discretion
  37 LAW & CONTEMP. PROBS. 49 (1972) · Law and Contemporary Problems · 1972

• Justiciability and Justice: Elements of Restraint and Indifference
  15 CATH. U. L. REV. 141 (1966) · Catholic University Law Review · 1966
• Controlling the Bureaucracy of the Antipoverty Program
  31 LAW & CONTEMP. PROBS. 187 (1966) · Law and Contemporary Problems · 1966

• Review Article
  43 CAL. L. REV. 743 (1955) · California Law Review · 1955