Timothy R. Holbrook

Publications

• Copyright Extraterritoriality
  62 SAN DIEGO L. REV. 737 (2026) · San Diego Law Review · 2026
• Remembering Dr. Dmitry Karshtedt as a Scholar and Friend
  21 NW. J. TECH. & INTELL. PROP. (2024) · Northwestern Journal of Technology and Intellectual Property · 2024
• Confusion Over Trademark Extraterritoriality ... and Beyond
  73 AM. U. L. REV. (2024) · American University Law Review · 2024

• Patent Prior Art and Possession
  60 WM. & MARY L. REV. 123 (2018) · William & Mary Law Review · 2018
• The Federal Circuit's Acquiescence (?)
  66 AM. U. L. REV. (2017) · American University Law Review · 2017
• Is the Supreme Court Concerned with Patent Law, the Federal Circuit, or Both: A Response to Judge Timothy B. Dyk
  16 CHI.-KENT J. INTELL. PROP. 313 (2017) · Chicago-Kent Journal of Intellectual Property · 2017
• Boundaries, Extraterritoriality, and Patent Infringement Damages
  92 NOTRE DAME L. REV. 1745 (2017) · Notre Dame Law Review · 2017
• Printing the Future: The Implications of 3D Printing
  4 TEX. A & M J. PROP. L. 15 (2017) · Texas A&M Journal of Property Law · 2017
• Patent Anticipation and Obviousness as Possession
  65 EMORY L.J. 987 (2016) · Emory Law Journal · 2016
• The Supreme Court's Quiet Revolution in Induced Patent Infringement
  91 NOTRE DAME L. REV. 1007 (2016) · Notre Dame Law Review · 2016
• Patent Disclosures and Time
  69 VAND. L. REV. 1459 (2016) · Vanderbilt Law Review · 2016
• Patent-Eligible Processes: An Audience Perspective
  17 VAND. J. ENT. & TECH. L. 349 (2015) · Vanderbilt Journal of Entertainment & Technology Law · 2015
• The Written Description Gap
  45 LOY. U. CHI. L.J. 345 (2013) · Loyola University Chicago Law Journal · 2013
• Explaining the Supreme Court's Interest in Patent Law
  IP Theory · 2013
• Should Foreign Patent Law Matter?
  34 CAMPBELL L. REV. 581 (2012) · Campbell Law Review · 2012
• The Potential Extraterritorial Consequences of Akamai
  26 EMORY INT'L L. REV. 499 (2012) · Emory International Law Review · 2012
• Territoriality and Tangibility After Transocean
  61 EMORY L.J. 1087 (2012) · Emory Law Journal · 2012
• Patent Law's Audience
  97 MINN. L. REV. 72 (2012) · Minnesota Law Review · 2012
• Patents, Presumptions, and Public Notice
  86 IND. L.J. (2011) · Indiana Law Journal · 2011

• The Pendulum Swings Back: The Impact of Recent SCOTUS and Federal Circuit Cases
  6 NW. J. TECH. & INTELL. PROP. 331 (2008) · Northwestern Journal of Technology and Intellectual Property · 2008
• Patents for Poets
  52 ST. LOUIS U. L.J. (2008) · Saint Louis University Law Journal · 2008
• Extraterritoriality in U.S. Patent Law
  49 WM. & MARY L. REV. 2119 (2008) · William & Mary Law Review · 2008
• The Return of the Supreme Court to Patent Law
  1 AKRON INTELL. PROP. J. (2007) · Akron Intellectual Property Journal · 2007
• The Intent Element of Induced Infringement
  22 SANTA CLARA HIGH TECH. L.J. 399 (2006) · Santa Clara High Technology Law Journal · 2006
• Possession in Patent Law
  59 SMU L. REV. 123 (2006) · SMU Law Review · 2006
• The Expressive Impact of Patents
  84 WASH. U. L. REV. 573 (2006) · Washington University Law Review · 2006
• The Treaty Power and the Patent Clause: Are There Limits on the United States' Ability to Harmonize?
  22 CARDOZO ARTS & ENT. L.J. 1 (2004) · Cardozo Arts & Entertainment Law Journal · 2004
• The Supreme Court's Complicity in Federal Circuit Formalism
  20 SANTA CLARA HIGH TECH. L.J. (2004) · Santa Clara High Technology Law Journal · 2004
• Liability for the Threat of a Sale: Assessing Patent Infringement for Offering to Sell an Invention and Implications for the On-Sale Patent Ability Bar and Other Forms of Infringement
  43 SANTA CLARA L. REV. 751 (2003) · Santa Clara Law Review · 2003
• The More Things Change, the More They Stay the Same: Implications of Pfaff v. Wells Electronics, Inc. and the Quest for Predictability in the On-Sale Bar
  15 BERKELEY TECH. L.J. 933 (2000) · Berkeley Technology Law Journal · 2000