Stephen M. Bainbridge

Publications

• A Critique of The American Law Institute’s Draft Restatement of the Corporate Objectiv
  2 U. CHI. BUS. L. REV. (2023) · The University of Chicago Business Law Review · 2023
• Bob Cochran on Law and Lawyering: A Catholic Perspective
  47 PEPP. L. REV. 371 (2020) · Pepperdine Law Review · 2020
• Corporate Purpose in a Populist Era
  98 NEB. L. REV. 543 (2020) · Nebraska Law Review · 2020

• Kokesh Footnote Three Notwithstanding: The Future of the Disgorgement Penalty in SEC Cases
  56 WASH. U. J. L. & POL'Y 017 (2018) · Washington University Journal of Law & Policy · 2018
• Equal Access to Information: The Fraud at the Heart of <em>Texas Gulf Sulphur</em>
  71 SMU L. REV. 643 (2018) · SMU Law Review · 2018
• Corporate Directors in the United Kingdom
  59 WM. & MARY L. REV. ONLINE 65 (2017) · William & Mary Law Review Online · 2017
• Revitalizing SEC Rule 14a-8’s Ordinary Business Exclusion: Preventing Shareholder Micromanagement by Proposal
  85 FORDHAM L. REV. 705 (2016) · Fordham Law Review · 2016
• The Geography of <em>Revlon</em>-Land
  81 FORDHAM L. REV. 3277 (2013) · Fordham Law Review · 2013
• Dodd-Frank: Quack Federal Corporate Governance Round Ii
  95 MINN. L. REV. 1779 (2011) · Minnesota Law Review · 2011
• The Bishop's Alter Ego: Enterprise Liability and the Catholic Priest Sex Abuse Scandal
  46 J. CATH. LEGAL STUD. (2010) · Journal of Catholic Legal Studies · 2010

• Why the North Dakota Publicly Traded Corporations Act Will Fail
  84 N. D. L. REV. 1043 (2008) · North Dakota Law Review · 2008
• Much Ado About Little? Directors' Fiduciary Duties in the Vicinity of Insolvency
  1 J. BUS. & TECH. L. 335 (2007) · Journal of Business & Technology Law · 2007
• Twilight in the Zone of Insolvency: Fiduciary Duty and Creditors of Troubled Companies - Presentation of Much Ado About Little? Directors' Fiduciary Duties in the Vicinity of Insolvency
  1 J. BUS. & TECH. L. 281 (2007) · Journal of Business & Technology Law · 2007
• Competing Concepts of the Corporation (a.k.a. Criteria - Just Say No)
  2 BERKELEY BUS. L.J. 77 (2005) · Berkeley Business Law Journal · 2005
• The Business Judgment Rule as Abstention Doctrine
  57 VAND. L. REV. 83 (2004) · Vanderbilt Law Review · 2004
• Why a Board? Group Decisionmaking in Corporate Governance
  55 VAND. L. REV. (2002) · Vanderbilt Law Review · 2002
• The Bishops and the Corporate Stakeholder Debate
  4 VILL. L.J. L. & INVESTMENT MGMT. 3 (2002) · Villanova Journal of Law and Investment Management (1999 - 2002) · 2002

• Insider Trading Regulation: The Path Dependent Choice between Property Rights and Securities Fraud
  52 SMU L. REV. 1589 (1999) · SMU Law Review · 1999
• Corporate Decisionmaking and the Moral Rights of Employees: Participatory Management and Natural Law
  43 VILL. L. REV. 741 (1998) · Villanova Law Review (1956 - ) · 1998
• Community and Statism: A Conservative Contractarian Critique of Progressive Corporate Law Scholarship
  82 CORNELL L. REV. 856 (1997) · Cornell Law Review · 1997
• Incorporating State Law Fiduciary Duties into the Federal Insider Trading Prohibition
  52 WASH. & LEE L. REV. 1189 (1995) · Washington and Lee Law Review · 1995
• In Defense Of The Shareholder Wealth Maximization Norm: A Reply To Professor Green
  50 WASH. & LEE L. REV. 1423 (1993) · Washington and Lee Law Review · 1993
• Interpreting Nonshareholder Constituency Statutes
  19 PEPP. L. REV. (1992) · Pepperdine Law Review · 1992
• The Short Life and Resurrection of SEC Rule 19C-4
  69 WASH. U. L. REV. 565 (1991) · Washington University Law Review · 1991
• Exclusive Merger Agreements and Lock-Ups in Negotiated Corporate Acquisitions
  75 MINN. L. REV. 239 (1990) · Minnesota Law Review · 1990

• The Insider Trading Prohibition: A Legal and Economic Enigma
  38 FLA. L. REV. 35 (1986) · Florida Law Review · 1986
• Comity and Sovereign Debt Litigation: a Bankruptcy Analogy
  10 MD. J. INT'L L. 1 (1986) · Maryland Journal of International Law · 1986