Stephen B. Burbank

Publications

• Class Certification in the U.S. Courts of Appeals: A Longitudinal Study
  84 LAW & CONTEMP. PROBS. 73 (2021) · Law and Contemporary Problems · 2021
• Politics, Identity, and Class Certification on the U.S. Courts of Appeals
  119 MICH. L. REV. 231 (2020) · Michigan Law Review · 2020

• Rights and Retrenchment in the Trump Era
  87 FORDHAM L. REV. 37 (2018) · Fordham Law Review · 2018
• The Subterranean Counterrevolution: The Supreme Court, the Media, and Litigation Retrenchment
  65 DEPAUL L. REV. (2016) · DePaul Law Review · 2016
• Federal Court Rulemaking and Litigation Reform: An Institutional Approach
  15 NV. L.J. FORUM 1559 (2015) · Nevada Law Journal · 2015
• Thinking, Big and Small
  46 U. MICH. J. L. REFORM 527 (2013) · University of Michigan Journal of Law Reform · 2013
• Summary Judgment, Pleading, and the Future of Transsubstantive Procedure
  43 AKRON L. REV. (2010) · Akron Law Review · 2010

• Showcase Panel II: Judicial Tenure: Life Tenure or Fixed Non-renewable Terms?
  12 BARRY L. REV. (2009) · Barry Law Review · 2009
• The Greening of Harry Blackmun
  Northwestern University Law Review · 2007
• Procedure, Politics and Power: The Role of Congress
  79 NOTRE DAME L. REV. 1677 (2004) · Notre Dame Law Review · 2004
• Semtek, Forum Shopping, and Federal Common Law
  77 NOTRE DAME L. REV. 1027 (2002) · Notre Dame Law Review · 2002
• The Roles of Litigation
  80 WASH. U. L. REV. 705 (2002) · Washington University Law Review · 2002
• Making Progress the Old-Fashioned Way
  149 U. PENN. L. REV. 1231 (2001) · University of Pennsylvania Law Review · 2001
• Bitter with the Sweet: Tradition, History, and Limitations on Federal Judicial Power--A Case Study
  75 NOTRE DAME L. REV. 1291 (2000) · Notre Dame Law Review · 2000
• Foreword: Causes and Limits of Pessimism
  148 U. PENN. L. REV. 1851 (2000) · University of Pennsylvania Law Review · 2000

• The Reluctant Partner: Making Procedural Law for International Civil Litigation
  57 LAW & CONTEMP. PROBS. 103 (1994) · Law and Contemporary Problems · 1994
• Ignorance and Procedural Law Reform: A Call For a Moratorium
  59 BROOK. L. REV. 841 (1993) · Brooklyn Law Review · 1993
• Foreword: The Law of Federal Judicial Discipline and the Lessons of Social Science
  142 U. PENN. L. REV. 1 (1993) · University of Pennsylvania Law Review · 1993
• State Ethical Codes and Federal Practice: Emerging Conflicts and Suggestions for Reform
  19 FORDHAM URB. L.J. 969 (1992) · Fordham Urban Law Journal · 1992
• The World in Our Courts
  89 MICH. L. REV. 1456 (1991) · Michigan Law Review · 1991

• Hold the Corks: A Comment on Paul Carrington’s “Substance” and “Procedure” in the Rules Enabling Act
  38 DUKE L.J. 1012 (1989) · Duke Law Journal · 1989
• The Report of the Third Circuit Task Force on Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 11: An Update
  19 SETON HALL L. REV. (1989) · Seton Hall Law Review · 1989
• For Leo Levin: Ave Atque Ave
  138 U. PENN. L. REV. 321 (1989) · University of Pennsylvania Law Review · 1989
• The Transformation of American Civil Procedure: The Example of Rule 11
  137 U. PENN. L. REV. 1925 (1989) · University of Pennsylvania Law Review · 1989
• Sic Transit Gloria Mundheim
  138 U. PENN. L. REV. 5 (1989) · University of Pennsylvania Law Review · 1989
• Of Rules and Discretion: The Supreme Court, Federal Rules and Common Law
  63 NOTRE DAME L. REV. 693 (1988) · Notre Dame Law Review · 1988
• Alternative Career Resolution: An Essay on the Removal of Federal Judges
  76 KY. L.J. (1988) · Kentucky Law Journal · 1988
• Introduction: "Plus Ça Change …?"
  21 U. MICH. J. L. REFORM 509 (1988) · University of Michigan Journal of Law Reform · 1988
• The Costs of Complexity
  85 MICH. L. REV. 1463 (1987) · Michigan Law Review · 1987
• Interjurisdictional Preclusion Full Faith and Credit and Federal Common Law: A General Approach
  71 CORNELL L. REV. 733 (1986) · Cornell Law Review · 1986
• Proposals to Amend Rule 68- Time to Abandon Ship
  19 U. MICH. J. L. REFORM 425 (1986) · University of Michigan Journal of Law Reform · 1986
• Interjurisdictional Preclusion and Federal Common Law Toward a General Approach
  70 CORNELL L. REV. 625 (1985) · Cornell Law Review · 1985
• Afterwords a Response to Professor Hazard and a Comment on Marrese
  70 CORNELL L. REV. 659 (1985) · Cornell Law Review · 1985
• Collins Seitz: A Noble Career
  132 U. PENN. L. REV. 1281 (1984) · University of Pennsylvania Law Review · 1984
• Sanctions in the Proposed Amendments to the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure: Some Questions about Power
  11 HOFSTRA L. REV. (1983) · Hofstra Law Review · 1983
• The Rules Enabling Act of 1934
  130 U. PENN. L. REV. 1015 (1982) · University of Pennsylvania Law Review · 1982
• Procedural Rulemaking under the Judicial Councils Reform and Judicial Conduct and Disability Act of 1980
  131 U. PENN. L. REV. 283 (1982) · University of Pennsylvania Law Review · 1982