Stephanos Bibas

Publications

• A Conversation with Judge Stephanos Bibas
  75 CATH. U. L. REV. 1 (2025) · Catholic University Law Review · 2025
• <i>Apprendi</i> at 20: Reviving the Jury's Role in Sentencing
  99 N. C. L. REV. 1189 (2021) · North Carolina Law Review · 2021
• Faith, Law, and Love: Peg Brinig's Legacy
  95 NOTRE DAME L. REV. 1423 (2020) · Notre Dame Law Review · 2020
• The Pros and Cons of Plea Bargaining
  45 U. DAYTON L. REV. (2020) · University of Dayton Law Review · 2020

• Small Crimes, Big Injustices
  117 MICH. L. REV. 1025 (2019) · Michigan Law Review · 2019
• Justice Scalia and the Criminal Law
  86 U. CIN. L. REV. 743 (2018) · University of Cincinnati Law Review · 2018
• Restoring Democratic Moral Judgment Within Bureaucratic Criminal Justice
  111 NW. U. L. REV. 1677 (2017) · Northwestern University Law Review · 2017
• Rationing Criminal Justice
  116 MICH. L. REV. 187 (2017) · Michigan Law Review · 2017
• Designing Plea Bargaining from the Ground Up: Accuracy and Fairness Without Trials as Backstops
  57 WM. & MARY L. REV. 1055 (2016) · William & Mary Law Review · 2016
• Sacrificing Quantity for Quality: Better Focusing Prosecutors’ Scarce Resources
  106 NW. U. L. REV. 138 (2015) · Northwestern University Law Review · 2015
• Constitutionally Tailoring Punishment
  112 MICH. L. REV. 397 (2013) · Michigan Law Review · 2013
• Shrinking Gideon and Expanding Alternatives to Lawyers
  70 WASH. & LEE L. REV. 1287 (2013) · Washington and Lee Law Review · 2013
• Panel 4: The Future of the Right to Counsel
  Washington and Lee Law Review · 2012
• Notice-And-Comment Sentencing
  97 MINN. L. REV. 1 (2012) · Minnesota Law Review · 2012
• The Myth of the Fully Informed Rational Actor
  31 ST. LOUIS U. PUB. L. REV. (2011) · Saint Louis University Public Law Review · 2011
• Regulating the Plea-Bargaining Market: From Caveat Emptor to Consumer Protection
  99 CAL. L. REV. 1117 (2011) · California Law Review · 2011
• International Idealism Meets Domestic-Criminal-Procedure Realism
  59 DUKE L.J. 637 (2010) · Duke Law Journal · 2010

• The Sixth Amendment and Criminal Sentencing
  30 CARDOZO L. REV. 775 (2008) · Cardozo Law Review · 2008
• Engaging Capital Emotions
  Northwestern University Law Review · 2008
• Regulating Local Variations in Federal Sentencing
  58 STAN. L. REV. (2006) · Stanford Law Review · 2006
• White-Collar Plea Bargaining and Sentencing After Booker
  47 WM. & MARY L. REV. 721 (2005) · William & Mary Law Review · 2005
• The Feeney Amendment and the Continuing Rise of Prosecutorial Power to Plea Bargain
  94 J. CRIM. L. & CRIMINOLOGY 295 (2004) · Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology · 2004
• Pleas' Progress
  102 MICH. L. REV. 1024 (2004) · Michigan Law Review · 2004
• The Psychology of Hindsight and After-the-Fact Review of Ineffective Assistance of Counsel
  2004 UTAH L. REV. (2004) · Utah Law Review · 2004
• Integrating Remorse and Apology into Criminal Procedure
  114 YALE L.J. 85 (2004) · Yale Law Journal · 2004
• Bringing Moral Values into a Flawed Plea-Bargaining System
  88 CORNELL L. REV. 1425 (2003) · Cornell Law Review · 2003
• Harmonizing Substantive-Criminal-Law Values and Criminal Procedure: The Case of Alford and Nolo Contendere Pleas
  88 CORNELL L. REV. 1361 (2003) · Cornell Law Review · 2003
• Apprendi in the States: The Virtues of Federalism as a Structural Limit on Errors
  94 J. CRIM. L. & CRIMINOLOGY (2003) · Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology · 2003
• Judicial Fact-Finding and Sentence Enhancements in a World of Guilty Pleas
  110 YALE L.J. 1097 (2001) · Yale Law Journal · 2001