Scott Dodson

Publications

• Restoring Chevron Deference by Statute
  75 DUKE L.J. 1603 (2026) · Duke Law Journal · 2026
• A Procedural Giant
  77 UC L.J. 1 (2026) · UC Law Journal · 2026
• Twiqbal: Past, Present, and Future
  114 CAL. L. REV. 1119 (2026) · California Law Review · 2026
• Restoring Chevron Deference by Statute
  75 DUKE L.J. 1 (2025) · Duke Law Journal · 2025
• The Complexities of Consent to Personal Jurisdiction
  113 CAL. L. REV. 333 (2025) · California Law Review · 2025
• The Missing Millions: Cy Pres in Federal Securities Class Actions
  74 EMORY L.J. (2024) · Emory Law Journal · 2024
• Rule 4 and Personal Jurisdiction
  99 NOTRE DAME L. REV. (2023) · Notre Dame Law Review · 2023
• Article III and the Political Question Doctrine
  116 NW. U. L. REV. 681 (2021) · Northwestern University Law Review · 2021

• Beyond Bias in Diversity Jurisdiction
  69 DUKE L.J. 267 (2019) · Duke Law Journal · 2019
• Plaintiff Personal Jurisdiction and Venue Transfer
  117 MICH. L. REV. 1463 (2019) · Michigan Law Review · 2019
• Jurisdiction in the Trump Era
  87 FORDHAM L. REV. 73 (2018) · Fordham Law Review · 2018
• Personal Jurisdiction and Aliens
  116 MICH. L. REV. 1205 (2018) · Michigan Law Review · 2018
• Defending Jurisdiction
  59 WM. & MARY L. REV. ONLINE 85 (2018) · William & Mary Law Review Online · 2018
• Personal Jurisdiction and Aggregation
  113 NW. U. L. REV. (2018) · Northwestern University Law Review · 2018
• The 2016 Presidential Election: The Next Four Years and beyond
  44 UC L. CONST. Q. 255 (2017) · UC Law Constitutional Quarterly · 2017
• Joint and Several Jurisdiction
  65 DUKE L.J. 1323 (2016) · Duke Law Journal · 2016
• An Opt-In Option for Class Actions
  115 MICH. L. REV. 171 (2016) · Michigan Law Review · 2016
• Rethinking Extraordinary Circumstances
  106 NW. U. L. REV. 111 (2015) · Northwestern University Law Review · 2015
• Rethinking Extraordinary Circumstances
  106 NW. U. L. REV. 351 (2015) · Northwestern University Law Review · 2015
• Atlantic Marine and the Future of Party Preference
  66 UC L.J. 675 (2015) · UC Law Journal · 2015
• Structuring Jurisdictional Rules and Standards
  65 VAND. L. REV. EN BANC (2012) · Vanderbilt Law Review En Banc · 2012
• Structuring Jurisdictional Rules and Standards
  65 VAND. L. REV. 31 (2012) · Vanderbilt Law Review · 2012
• Hybridizing Jurisdiction
  99 CAL. L. REV. 1439 (2011) · California Law Review · 2011
• New Pleading, New Discovery
  109 MICH. L. REV. 53 (2010) · Michigan Law Review · 2010
• Justice Souter and the Civil Rules
  88 WASH. U. L. REV. 289 (2010) · Washington University Law Review · 2010
• Justice Souter and the Civil Rules
  Washington University Law Review Commentaries · 2010
• Mandatory Rules
  61 STAN. L. REV. (2010) · Stanford Law Review · 2010

• Appreciating Mandatory Rules: A Reply to Critics
  Northwestern University Law Review · 2008
• The Failure of Bowles V. Russell
  43 TULSA L. REV. 631 (2008) · Tulsa Law Review · 2008
• A Darwinist View of the Living Constitution
  61 VAND. L. REV. 1319 (2008) · Vanderbilt Law Review · 2008
• Jurisdictionality and Bowles v. Russell
  Northwestern University Law Review · 2007
• Constitutional Thematics and the Peculiar Federal Marriage Amendment
  20 BYU J. PUB. L. 233 (2006) · Brigham Young University Journal of Public Law · 2006
• Subclassing
  27 CARDOZO L. REV. 2351 (2006) · Cardozo Law Review · 2006
• Dignity: The New Frontier of State Sovereignty
  56 OKLA. L. REV. 777 (2003) · Oklahoma Law Review · 2003
• Vectoral Federalism
  20 GA. ST. U. L. REV. (2003) · Georgia State University Law Review · 2003
• The Metes and Bounds of State Sovereign Immunity
  29 UC L. CONST. Q. 721 (2002) · UC Law Constitutional Quarterly · 2002
• Assessing the Practicality and Constitutionality of Alaska’s Split-Recovery Punitive Damages Statute
  49 DUKE L.J. 1335 (2000) · Duke Law Journal · 2000