Scott D. Locke

Publications

• The Invention Secrecy Act: The USPTO as a Gatekeeper of National Security
  IP Theory · 2019
• Parallel Novels and the Reimagining of Literary Notables by Follow-On Authors: Copyrights Issues When Characters Are First Created by Others
  17 CHI.-KENT J. INTELL. PROP. 271 (2018) · Chicago-Kent Journal of Intellectual Property · 2018
• The Trademark Disclaimer Provision of the Lanham Act: Is USPTO Flexibility Worth Litigant Ambiguity?, 17 J. Marshall Rev. Intell. Prop. L. 305 (2018)
  17 J. MARSHALL. REV. INTELL. PROP. L. (2018) · UIC Review of Intellectual Property Law · 2018
• Design Patent Litigation: Is "Obvious to Try" Unavailable for Validity Challenges Under 35 U.S.C. § 103?, 16 J. Marshall Rev. Intell. Prop. L. 173 (2017)
  16 J. MARSHALL. REV. INTELL. PROP. L. (2017) · UIC Review of Intellectual Property Law · 2017
• Patent Marking Estoppel and the Patent Licensee
  9 NW. J. TECH. & INTELL. PROP. 337 (2011) · Northwestern Journal of Technology and Intellectual Property · 2011

• Business Method Patents: The Challenge of Coping With an Ever Changing Standard of Patentability
  18 FORDHAM INTELL. PROP. MEDIA & ENT. L.J. 1079 (2008) · Fordham Intellectual Property, Media and Entertainment Law Journal · 2008
• Panel I: The Business Method Patent and the Patent Reform Act of 2007: Can the Law Keep Pace with Technology?
  18 FORDHAM INTELL. PROP. MEDIA & ENT. L.J. 1025 (2008) · Fordham Intellectual Property, Media and Entertainment Law Journal · 2008
• Intellectual Property for the Botanist and the Plant Breeder: An Overview of Protection Afforded by Plant Patents and Plant Variety Protection Certificates
  6 CHI.-KENT J. INTELL. PROP. 198 (2007) · Chicago-Kent Journal of Intellectual Property · 2007
• Fifth Avenue and the Patent Lawyer: Strategies for Using Design Patents to Increase the Value of Fashion and Luxury Goods Companies, 5 J. Marshall Rev. Intell. Prop. L. 40 (2005)
  5 J. MARSHALL. REV. INTELL. PROP. L. (2005) · UIC Review of Intellectual Property Law · 2005
• Preparing for Bioinformatics Litigation: How Will the Courts Confront the Next Generation of Biotechnology Patents?
  1 BUFF. INTELL. PROP. L.J. 76 (2001) · Buffalo Intellectual Property Law Journal · 2001