Saurabh Vishnubhakat

Publications

• Patent Inconsistency
  97 IND. L.J. (2022) · Indiana Law Journal · 2022
• The Truth About Design Patents
  71 AM. U. L. REV. (2022) · American University Law Review · 2022
• Post-Grant Adjudication of Drup Patents: Agency and/or Court?
  37 BERKELEY TECH. L.J. 139 (2022) · Berkeley Technology Law Journal · 2022
• Copyright's Excess: Symposium Foreword
  6 TEX. A & M J. PROP. L. (2020) · Texas A&M Journal of Property Law · 2020
• Disguised Patent Policymaking
  76 WASH. & LEE L. REV. 1667 (2020) · Washington and Lee Law Review · 2020

• The Mixed Case For a PTAB Off-Ramp
  18 CHI.-KENT J. INTELL. PROP. 514 (2019) · Chicago-Kent Journal of Intellectual Property · 2019
• The Non-Doctrine of Redundancy
  33 BERKELEY TECH. L.J. 777 (2019) · Berkeley Technology Law Journal · 2019
• The Field of Invention
  45 HOFSTRA L. REV. (2017) · Hofstra Law Review · 2017
• The Porous Court-Agency Border in Patent Law
  51 AKRON L. REV. (2017) · Akron Law Review · 2017
• The Antitrusting of Patentability
  48 SETON HALL L. REV. (2017) · Seton Hall Law Review · 2017
• An Intentional Tort Theory of Patents
  68 FLA. L. REV. 571 (2016) · Florida Law Review · 2016
• Strategic Decision Making in Dual PTAB and District Court Proceedings
  31 BERKELEY TECH. L.J. 45 (2016) · Berkeley Technology Law Journal · 2016
• Expired Patents
  64 CATH. U. L. REV. 419 (2015) · Catholic University Law Review · 2015
• What's It Worth to Keep a Secret?
  13 DUKE L. & TECH. REV. 116 (2015) · Duke Law & Technology Review · 2015
• The USPTO Patent Pro Bono Program
  7 CYBARIS (2015) · Cybaris® · 2015
• Certain Patents
  Yale Journal of Law and Technology · 2015
• What Patent Attorney Fee Awards Really Look Like
  63 DUKE L.J. 15 (2014) · Duke Law Journal · 2014
• Gender Diversity in the Patent Bar, 14 J. Marshall Rev. Intell. Prop. L. 67 (2014)
  14 J. MARSHALL. REV. INTELL. PROP. L. (2014) · UIC Review of Intellectual Property Law · 2014
• Reconceiving the Patent Rocket Docket: An Empirical Study of Infringement Litigation 1985–2010, 11 J. Marshall Rev. Intell. Prop. L. 58 (2011)
  11 J. MARSHALL. REV. INTELL. PROP. L. (2011) · UIC Review of Intellectual Property Law · 2011