Rochelle Cooper Dreyfuss

Publications

• The Past and Future in International Patent Law
  41 CARDOZO ARTS & ENT. L.J. 425 (2023) · Cardozo Arts & Entertainment Law Journal · 2023
• Technological Self-Sufficiency and the Role of Novelty Traps
  24 VAND. J. ENT. & TECH. L. 441 (2022) · Vanderbilt Journal of Entertainment & Technology Law · 2022

• Brexit and IP: The Great Unraveling?
  39 CARDOZO L. REV. 967 (2018) · Cardozo Law Review · 2018
• Reconceptualizing ISDS: When Is IP an Investment and How Much Can States Regulate It
  21 VAND. J. ENT. & TECH. L. 377 (2018) · Vanderbilt Journal of Entertainment & Technology Law · 2018
• Misappropriation on a Global Scale: Extraterritoriality and Applicable Law in Transborder Trade Secrecy Cases
  8 CYBARIS (2017) · Cybaris® · 2017
• Giving the Federal Circuit a Run for Its Money: Challenging Patents in the PTAB
  91 NOTRE DAME L. REV. 235 (2015) · Notre Dame Law Review · 2015
• From Incentive to Commodity to Asset: How International Law is Reconceptualizing Intellectual Property
  36 MICH. J. INT'L L. 557 (2015) · Michigan Journal of International Law · 2015
• Percolation, Uniformity, and Coherent Adjudication: The Federal Circuit Experience
  66 SMU L. REV. 505 (2013) · SMU Law Review · 2013
• What the Federal Circuit can Learn from the Supreme Court-and Vice Versa
  59 AM. U. L. REV. (2010) · American University Law Review · 2010
• Does IP Need IP? Accommodating Intellectual Production Outside the Intellectual Property Paradigm
  31 CARDOZO L. REV. 1437 (2010) · Cardozo Law Review · 2010
• The Federal Circuit as an Institution: What Ought We to Expect
  43 LOY. L. A. L. REV. 827 (2010) · Loyola of Los Angeles Law Review · 2010

• The Role of the Federal Circuit
  Loyola of Los Angeles Law Review · 2009
• Dethroning Lear - Incentives to Innovate after MedImmune
  24 BERKELEY TECH. L.J. 971 (2009) · Berkeley Technology Law Journal · 2009
• In Search of Institutional Identity: The Federal Circuit Comes of Age
  23 BERKELEY TECH. L.J. 787 (2008) · Berkeley Technology Law Journal · 2008
• Harmonization Without Consensus: Critical Reflections on Drafting a Substantive Patent Law Treaty
  57 DUKE L.J. 85 (2007) · Duke Law Journal · 2007
• Creative Lawmaking: A Comment on Lionel Bently, <em>Copyright, Translations, and Relations between Britain and India in the Nineteenth and Early Twentieth Centuries</em>
  82 CHI.-KENT. L. REV. 1243 (2007) · Chicago-Kent Law Review · 2007
• Diversifying without Discriminating: Complying with the Mandates of the TRIPS Agreement
  13 MICH. TELECOMM. & TECH. L. REV. 445 (2007) · Michigan Telecommunications & Technology Law Review · 2007
• Pathological Patenting: The PTO as Cause or Cure
  104 MICH. L. REV. 1559 (2006) · Michigan Law Review · 2006
• The ALI Principles on Transnational Intellectual Property Disputes: Why Invite Conflicts?
  30 BROOK. J. INT'L L. (2005) · Brooklyn Journal of International Law · 2005
• The Federal Circuit: A Continuing Experiment Specialization
  54 CASE W. RES. L. REV. 769 (2004) · Case Western Reserve Law Review · 2004
• TRIPS-Round II: Should Users Strike Back?
  71 U. CHI. L. REV. (2004) · University of Chicago Law Review · 2004
• TRIPS and the Dynamics of Intellectual Property Lawmaking
  36 CASE W. RES. J. INT'L L. 95 (2004) · Case Western Reserve Journal of International Law · 2004
• Draft Convention on Jurisdiction and Recognition of Judgments in Intellectual Property Matters
  77 CHI.-KENT. L. REV. 1065 (2002) · Chicago-Kent Law Review · 2002
• Coming of Age with TRIPS: A Comment on J.H. Reichman, the TRIPS Agreement Comes of Age: Conflict or Cooperation with the Developing Countries
  33 CASE W. RES. J. INT'L L. 179 (2001) · Case Western Reserve Journal of International Law · 2001
• COMMENTARY: UCITA In the International Marketplace: Are We About to Export Bad Innovation Policy?
  26 BROOK. J. INT'L L. 49 (2000) · Brooklyn Journal of International Law · 2000
• Collaborative Research: Conflicts on Authorship, Ownership, and Accountability
  53 VAND. L. REV. 1159 (2000) · Vanderbilt Law Review · 2000
• Games Economists Play
  53 VAND. L. REV. 1821 (2000) · Vanderbilt Law Review · 2000
• Are Business Method Patents Bad for Business?
  16 SANTA CLARA HIGH TECH. L.J. 263 (2000) · Santa Clara High Technology Law Journal · 2000

• Do You Want to Know a Trade Secret--How Article 2B Will Make Licensing Trade Secrets Easier (But Innovation More Difficult)
  87 CAL. L. REV. 191 (1999) · California Law Review · 1999
• Trade Secrets: How Well Should We Be Allowed to Hide Them? The Economic Espionage Act of 1996
  9 FORDHAM INTELL. PROP. MEDIA & ENT. L.J. (1998) · Fordham Intellectual Property, Media and Entertainment Law Journal · 1998
• Galileo's Tribute: Using Medical Evidence in Court
  95 MICH. L. REV. 2055 (1997) · Michigan Law Review · 1997
• Forums of the Future
  61 BROOK. L. REV. (1995) · Brooklyn Law Review · 1995
• Virtual Reality, Appropriation, and Property Rights In Art: A Roundtable Discussion
  13 CARDOZO ARTS & ENT. L.J. 89 (1994) · Cardozo Arts & Entertainment Law Journal · 1994
• The What and Why of the New Discovery Rules
  46 FLA. L. REV. 9 (1994) · Florida Law Review · 1994
• Copyright Protection: Has Look & Feel Crashed?
  11 CARDOZO ARTS & ENT. L.J. 721 (1993) · Cardozo Arts & Entertainment Law Journal · 1993
• A "Wiseguy"'s Approach to Information Products: Muscling Copyright and Patent into a Unitary Theory of Intellectual Property
  1992 SUP. CT. REV. (1992) · Supreme Court Review · 1992
• The Jurisprudence of Genetics
  45 VAND. L. REV. 313 (1992) · Vanderbilt Law Review · 1992
• Specialized Adjudication
  1990 BYU L. REV. 377 (1990) · BYU Law Review · 1990
• Expressive Genericity: Trademarks as Language in the Pepsi Generation
  65 NOTRE DAME L. REV. 397 (1990) · Notre Dame Law Review · 1990

• The Creative Employee and the Copyright Act of 1976
  54 U. CHI. L. REV. (1987) · University of Chicago Law Review · 1987
• Dethroning Lear: Licensee Estoppel and the Incentive to Innovate
  72 VA. L. REV. 677 (1986) · Virginia Law Review · 1986
• Promoting the Vindication of Civil Rights through the Attorney's Fees Awards Act
  80 COLUM. L. REV. 346 (1980) · Columbia Law Review · 1980