Richard S. Frase

Publications

• Can Sentencing Guidelines Commissions Help States Substantially Reduce Mass Incarceration? The 2019 Minnesota Law Review Symposium - Mass Incarceration
  104 MINN. L. REV. 2781 (2020) · Minnesota Law Review · 2020

• Suspended Sentences and Free-Standing Probation Orders in U.S. Guidelines Systems: A Survey and Assessment
  82 LAW & CONTEMP. PROBS. 51 (2019) · Law and Contemporary Problems · 2019
• A Consumer's Guide to Sentencing Reform: Reflections on Zimring's Cautionary Tale
  23 BERKELEY J. CRIM. L. 1 (2018) · Berkeley Journal of Criminal Law · 2018

• Punishment Purposes
  58 STAN. L. REV. (2006) · Stanford Law Review · 2006
• Excessive Prison Sentences, Punishment Goals, and the Eighth Amendment: "Proportionality" Relative to What?
  89 MINN. L. REV. 571 (2005) · Minnesota Law Review · 2005
• What Were They Thinking? Fourth Amendment Unreasonableness in Atwater v. City of Lago Vista
  71 FORDHAM L. REV. 329 (2002) · Fordham Law Review · 2002
• Is Guided Discretion Sufficient? Overview of State Sentencing Guidelines
  44 ST. LOUIS U. L.J. (2000) · Saint Louis University Law Journal · 2000

• Main-Streaming Comparative Criminal Justice: How to Incorporate Comparative and International Concepts and Materials into Basic Criminal Law and Procedure Courses
  100 W. VA. L. REV. (1998) · West Virginia Law Review · 1998
• Implementing Commission-Based Sentencing Guidelines: The Lessons of the First Ten Years in Minnesota
  2 CORNELL J. L. & PUB. POL'Y 279 (1993) · Cornell Journal of Law and Public Policy · 1993
• The Uncertain Future of Sentencing Guidelines
  12 MINN. J. L. & INEQ. (1993) · Minnesota Journal of Law & Inequality · 1993
• Sentencing Reform in Minnesota, Ten Years after: Reflections on Dale G. Parent's Structuring Criminal Sentences: The Evolution of Minnesota's Sentencing Guidelines
  75 MINN. L. REV. 727 (1991) · Minnesota Law Review · 1991
• Comparative Criminal Justice as a Guide to American Law Reform: How do the French do it, How can we Find out, and Why Should we Care
  78 CAL. L. REV. 539 (1990) · California Law Review · 1990

• Defining the Limits of Crime Control and Due Process
  73 CAL. L. REV. 212 (1985) · California Law Review · 1985
• The Decision to File Federal Criminal Charges: A Quantitative Study of Prosecutorial Discretion
  47 U. CHI. L. REV. (1980) · University of Chicago Law Review · 1980

• The Speedy Trial Act of 1974
  43 U. CHI. L. REV. (1976) · University of Chicago Law Review · 1976