Richard L. Marcus

Publications

• A Legend in His Own Time, and a Fixer for Mass Tort Litigation
  84 LAW & CONTEMP. PROBS. 183 (2021) · Law and Contemporary Problems · 2021

• Revolution v. Evolution in Class Action Reform
  96 N. C. L. REV. 903 (2018) · North Carolina Law Review · 2018
• Bending in the Breeze: American Class Actions in the Twenty-First Century
  65 DEPAUL L. REV. (2016) · DePaul Law Review · 2016
• Bomb Throwing, Democratic Theory, and Basic Values—A New Path to Procedural Harmonization?
  107 NW. U. L. REV. 475 (2015) · Northwestern University Law Review · 2015
• Panel I: In a Class by Itself: Has the Roberts Court Slammed the courthouse Door on Class Actions?
  Emory Law Journal · 2014
• The Rulemakers’ Laments
  81 FORDHAM L. REV. 1639 (2013) · Fordham Law Review · 2013
• Shoes That Did Not Drop
  46 U. MICH. J. L. REFORM 637 (2013) · University of Michigan Journal of Law Reform · 2013
• Still Confronting the Confronting the Consolidation Conundrum
  88 NOTRE DAME L. REV. 557 (2012) · Notre Dame Law Review · 2012

• The Electronic Lawyer
  58 DEPAUL L. REV. 263 (2009) · DePaul Law Review · 2009
• Not Dead Yet
  61 OKLA. L. REV. 299 (2008) · Oklahoma Law Review · 2008
• Keynote Address: E-Discovery beyond the Federal Rules
  37 U. BALT. L. REV. (2008) · University of Baltimore Law Review · 2008
• Modes of Procedural Reform
  31 UC L. SF INT'L L. REV. 157 (2008) · UC Law SF International Law Review · 2008
• A Modest Proposal: Recognizing (at Last) That the Federal Rules Do Not Declare That Discovery Is Presumptively Public
  81 CHI.-KENT. L. REV. 331 (2006) · Chicago-Kent Law Review · 2006
• Only Yesterday: Reflections on Rulemaking Responses to E-Discovery
  73 FORDHAM L. REV. (2004) · Fordham Law Review · 2004
• Only Yesterday: Reflections on Rulemaking Responses to E-Discovery
  73 FORDHAM L. REV. 1 (2004) · Fordham Law Review · 2004
• Slouching toward Discretion
  78 NOTRE DAME L. REV. 1561 (2003) · Notre Dame Law Review · 2003
• Reining in the American Litigator: The New Role of American Judges
  27 UC L. SF INT'L L. REV. 3 (2003) · UC Law SF International Law Review · 2003
• Reassessing the Magnetic Pull of Megacases on Procedure
  51 DEPAUL L. REV. 457 (2002) · DePaul Law Review · 2002
• Reform Through Rulemaking?
  80 WASH. U. L. REV. 901 (2002) · Washington University Law Review · 2002
• Confronting the Future: Coping with Discovery of Electronic Material
  64 LAW & CONTEMP. PROBS. 253 (2001) · Law and Contemporary Problems · 2001
• The Agenda-Setter for Complex Litigation
  149 U. PENN. L. REV. 1257 (2001) · University of Pennsylvania Law Review · 2001
• Benign Neglect Reconsidered
  148 U. PENN. L. REV. 2009 (2000) · University of Pennsylvania Law Review · 2000

• Confronting the Consolidation Conundrum
  1995 BYU L. REV. 879 (1995) · BYU Law Review · 1995
• They Can’t Do That Can They? Tort Reform via Rule 23
  80 CORNELL L. REV. 858 (1995) · Cornell Law Review · 1995
• Discovery Along the Litigation/Science Interface
  57 BROOK. L. REV. 381 (1991) · Brooklyn Law Review · 1991

• <em>Public Law Litigation</em> and Legal Scholarship
  21 U. MICH. J. L. REFORM 647 (1988) · University of Michigan Journal of Law Reform · 1988
• Apocalypse Now?
  85 MICH. L. REV. 1267 (1987) · Michigan Law Review · 1987
• The Perils of Privilege: Waiver and the Litigator
  84 MICH. L. REV. 1605 (1986) · Michigan Law Review · 1986
• Conflicts Among Circuits and Transfers Within the Federal Judicial System
  93 YALE L.J. 677 (1984) · Yale Law Journal · 1984
• Myth and Reality in Protective Order Litigation
  69 CORNELL L. REV. (1983) · Cornell Law Review · 1983
• Myth and Reality in Protective Order Litigation
  69 CORNELL L. REV. 1 (1983) · Cornell Law Review · 1983

• The Supreme Court of California 1970-1971: Property
  60 CAL. L. REV. 937 (1972) · California Law Review · 1972
• Punitive Damages under Federal Statutes: A Functional Analysis
  60 CAL. L. REV. 191 (1972) · California Law Review · 1972
• The Supreme Court of California 1970-1971
  60 CAL. L. REV. 705 (1972) · California Law Review · 1972