Richard L. Hasen

Publications

• Nonprofit Law as the Tool to Kill What Remains of Campaign Finance Law: Reluctant Lessons from Ellen Aprill
  Loyola of Los Angeles Law Review · 2023
• Nonprofit Law as the Tool to Kill What Remains of Campaign Finance Law: Reluctant Lessons from Ellen Aprill
  56 LOY. L. A. L. REV. 1233 (2023) · Loyola of Los Angeles Law Review · 2023
• Deep Fakes, Bots, and Siloed Justices: American Election Law in a “Post-Truth” World
  64 ST. LOUIS U. L.J. (2020) · Saint Louis University Law Journal · 2020

• Keynote Address: Judging the Political and Political Judging: Justice Scalia as Case Study
  93 CHI.-KENT. L. REV. 325 (2018) · Chicago-Kent Law Review · 2018
• Cheap Speech and What It Has Done (To American Democracy)
  16 FIRST AMEND. L. REV. 200 (2018) · First Amendment Law Review · 2018
• Race or Party, Race as Party, or Party All the Time: Three Uneasy Approaches to Conjoined Polarization in Redistricting and Voting Cases
  59 WM. & MARY L. REV. 1837 (2018) · William & Mary Law Review · 2018
• The 2016 Voting Wars: From Bad to Worse
  26 WM. & MARY BILL RTS. J. 629 (2018) · William & Mary Bill of Rights Journal · 2018
• Reining in the Purcell Principle
  43 FLA. ST. U. L. REV. 427 (2016) · Florida State University Law Review · 2016
• Election Law’s Path in the Roberts Court’s First Decade
  68 STAN. L. REV. (2016) · Stanford Law Review · 2016
• Why Isn’t Congress More Corrupt?: A Preliminary Inquiry
  84 FORDHAM L. REV. 429 (2015) · Fordham Law Review · 2015
• When Is Uniformity of People, Not Counties, Appropriate in Election Administration? - The Cases of Early and Sunday Voting
  2015 U. CHI. LEGAL F. (2015) · University of Chicago Legal Forum · 2015
• Super PAC Contributions, Corruption, and the Proxy War Over Coordination
  9 DUKE J. CONST. L. & PUB. POL'Y 1 (2014) · Duke Journal of Constitutional Law & Public Policy · 2014
• Shelby County and the Illusion of Minimalism
  22 WM. & MARY BILL RTS. J. 713 (2014) · William & Mary Bill of Rights Journal · 2014
• A Constitutional Right to Lie in Campaigns and Elections?
  74 MONT. L. REV. 53 (2013) · Montana Law Review · 2013
• Anticipatory Overrulings, Invitations, Time Bombs, and Inadvertence: How Supreme Court Justices Move the Law
  61 EMORY L.J. 779 (2012) · Emory Law Journal · 2012
• Teaching Bush v. Gore as History
  56 ST. LOUIS U. L.J. (2012) · Saint Louis University Law Journal · 2012
• Lobbying, Rent-Seeking, and the Constitution
  64 STAN. L. REV. (2012) · Stanford Law Review · 2012
• Citizens United and the Orphaned Antidistortion Rationale
  27 GA. ST. U. L. REV. (2012) · Georgia State University Law Review · 2012
• Citizens United and the Illusion of Coherence
  109 MICH. L. REV. 581 (2011) · Michigan Law Review · 2011
• The Benefits of the Democracy Canon and the Virtues of Simplicity: A Reply to Professor Elmendorf
  95 CORNELL L. REV. 1173 (2010) · Cornell Law Review · 2010
• David Leonard: Teacher, Scholar, Friend
  43 LOY. L. A. L. REV. 716 (2010) · Loyola of Los Angeles Law Review · 2010
• You Don't Have To Be A Structuralist To Hate The Supreme Court's Dignitary Harm Election Law Cases
  64 U. MIAMI L. REV. 465 (2010) · University of Miami Law Review · 2010
• The Untimely Death of Bush v. Gore
  60 STAN. L. REV. (2010) · Stanford Law Review · 2010
• The Democracy Canon
  62 STAN. L. REV. (2010) · Stanford Law Review · 2010
• Election Administration Reform and the New Institutionalism
  98 CAL. L. REV. 1075 (2010) · California Law Review · 2010
• Transcript: Session 1: One Symptom of a Serious Problem: <em>Caperton v. Massey</em>
  33 SEATTLE U. L. REV. 569 (2010) · Seattle University Law Review · 2010

• Introduction: Developments in Election Law
  42 LOY. L. A. L. REV. 565 (2009) · Loyola of Los Angeles Law Review · 2009
• <i>Bush v. Gore</i> and the Lawlessness Principle: A Comment on Professor Amar
  61 FLA. L. REV. 979 (2009) · Florida Law Review · 2009
• Constitutional Avoidance and Anti‐Avoidance by the Roberts Court
  2009 SUP. CT. REV. (2009) · Supreme Court Review · 2009
• Assessing California's Hybrid Democracy
  97 CAL. L. REV. 1501 (2009) · California Law Review · 2009
• "Too Plain for Argument?" The Uncertain Congressional Power to Require Parties to Choose Presidential Nominees Through Direct and Equal Primaries
  Northwestern University Law Review · 2008
• When Legislature May Mean More than Legislature: Initiated Electoral College Reform and the Ghost of Bush v. Gore
  35 UC L. CONST. Q. 599 (2008) · UC Law Constitutional Quarterly · 2008
• Beyond Incoherence: The Roberts Court's Deregulatory Turn in FEC V. Wisconsin Right to Life
  92 MINN. L. REV. 1064 (2008) · Minnesota Law Review · 2008
• No Exit - The Roberts Court and the Future of Election Law
  57 S. C. L. REV. (2006) · South Carolina Law Review · 2006
• The Supreme Court and Election Law: A Reply to Three Commentators, The;Symposium
  31 J. LEGIS. (2005) · Journal of Legislation · 2005
• Beyond the Margin of Litigation: Reforming U.S. Election Administration to Avoid Electoral Meltdown
  62 WASH. & LEE L. REV. 937 (2005) · Washington and Lee Law Review · 2005
• Buckley Is Dead, Long Live Buckley: The New Campaign Finance Incoherence of McConnell v. Federal Election Commission
  153 U. PENN. L. REV. 31 (2004) · University of Pennsylvania Law Review · 2004
• The Benefits of Judicially Unmanageable Standards in Election Cases under the Equal Protection Clause
  80 N. C. L. REV. 1469 (2002) · North Carolina Law Review · 2002
• Bush v. Gore and the Future of Equal Protection Law in Elections
  29 FLA. ST. U. L. REV. (2001) · Florida State University Law Review · 2001
• Internet Voting and Democracy—Introduction
  34 LOY. L. A. L. REV. 979 (2001) · Loyola of Los Angeles Law Review · 2001
• Do the Parties or the People Own the Electoral Process
  149 U. PENN. L. REV. 815 (2001) · University of Pennsylvania Law Review · 2001
• Shrink Missouri, Campaign Finance, and "The Thing that Frederick Schauer Wouldn't Leave"
  17 CONST. COMMENT. 483 (2000) · Constitutional Commentary · 2000
• Vote Buying
  88 CAL. L. REV. 1323 (2000) · California Law Review · 2000

• Introduction—Election Law at Puberty: Optimism and Words of Caution
  32 LOY. L. A. L. REV. 1095 (1999) · Loyola of Los Angeles Law Review · 1999
• Pluralism with a Corporate Face: A Comment on Issacharoff and Ortiz
  85 VA. L. REV. 1671 (1999) · Virginia Law Review · 1999
• Judging the Judges of Initiatives: A Comment on Holman and Stern
  31 LOY. L. A. L. REV. 1267 (1998) · Loyola of Los Angeles Law Review · 1998
• High Court Wrongly Elected: A Public Choice Model of Judging and Its Implications for the Voting Rights Act
  75 N. C. L. REV. 1305 (1997) · North Carolina Law Review · 1997
• Entrenching the Duopoly: Why the Supreme Court Should Not Allow the States to Protect the Democrats and Republicans from Political Competition
  1997 SUP. CT. REV. (1997) · Supreme Court Review · 1997
• Clipping Coupons for Democracy: An Egalitarian/Public Choice Defense of Campaign Finance Vouchers
  84 CAL. L. REV. 1 (1996) · California Law Review · 1996
• Voting Without Law
  144 U. PENN. L. REV. 2135 (1996) · University of Pennsylvania Law Review · 1996
• An Enriched Economic Model of Political Patronage and Campaign Contributions: Reformulating Supreme Court Jurisprudence
  14 CARDOZO L. REV. 1311 (1993) · Cardozo Law Review · 1993