Paul E. Mcgreal

Publications

• Ten Commandments Cases: Learning from Reformation Coercion
  124 MICH. L. REV. ONLINE 69 (2026) · Michigan Law Review Online · 2026
• True Threats and the Neuroscience of Fear
  75 CASE W. RES. L. REV. 899 (2025) · Case Western Reserve Law Review · 2025
• Reforming the Ministerial Exception
  69 VILL. L. REV. 101 (2024) · Villanova Law Review (1956 - ) · 2024

• Tribute to Professor Linda Eads
  72 SMU L. REV. 553 (2019) · SMU Law Review · 2019

• The Case for a Constitutional Easement Approach to Permanent Monuments in Traditional Public Forums
  Northwestern University Law Review · 2008
• Counteracting Ambition: Applying Corporate Compliance and Ethics to the Separation of Powers Concerns with Domestic Surveillance
  60 SMU L. REV. 1571 (2007) · SMU Law Review · 2007
• A Constitutional Defense of Legislative History
  13 WM. & MARY BILL RTS. J. 1267 (2005) · William & Mary Bill of Rights Journal · 2005
• Saving Article I from Seminole Tribe: A View from the Federalist Papers
  55 SMU L. REV. 393 (2002) · SMU Law Review · 2002
• Why Repeal of the Death Tax Means the Second Demise of Substantive Due Process
  39 SAN DIEGO L. REV. (2002) · San Diego Law Review · 2002
• There is No Such Thing as Textualism: A Case Study in Constitutional Method
  69 FORDHAM L. REV. 2393 (2001) · Fordham Law Review · 2001
• Unconstitutional Politics
  76 NOTRE DAME L. REV. 519 (2001) · Notre Dame Law Review · 2001
• Applying Coase to Qui Tam Actions against the States
  77 NOTRE DAME L. REV. 87 (2001) · Notre Dame Law Review · 2001
• Ambition's Playground
  68 FORDHAM L. REV. 1107 (2000) · Fordham Law Review · 2000

• Conflict of Laws
  52 SMU L. REV. 835 (1999) · SMU Law Review · 1999
• The Role of Suspicion in Federal Equal Protection
  8 WM. & MARY BILL RTS. J. 183 (1999) · William & Mary Bill of Rights Journal · 1999
• Alaska Equal Protection: Constitutional Law or Common Law?
  15 ALASKA L. REV. 209 (1998) · Alaska Law Review · 1998
• The Flawed Economics of the Dormant Commerce Clause
  39 WM. & MARY L. REV. 1191 (1998) · William & Mary Law Review · 1998
• Some <i>Rice</i> with Your <i>Chevron</i>: Presumption and Deference in Regulatory Preemption ?
  45 CASE W. RES. L. REV. 823 (1995) · Case Western Reserve Law Review · 1995
• Conflict of Laws
  47 SMU L. REV. 865 (1994) · SMU Law Review · 1994
• Conflict of Laws
  46 SMU L. REV. 1123 (1993) · SMU Law Review · 1993
• A Tale of Two Courts: The Alaska Supreme Court, the United States Supreme Court, and Retroactivity
  9 ALASKA L. REV. 305 (1992) · Alaska Law Review · 1992