Orin S. Kerr

Publications

• Katz as Originalism
  71 DUKE L.J. 1047 (2022) · Duke Law Journal · 2022
• The Fourth Amendment Limits of Internet Content Preservation
  65 ST. LOUIS U. L.J. (2021) · Saint Louis University Law Journal · 2021
• Focusing the CFAA in Van Buren
  2021 SUP. CT. REV. (2021) · Supreme Court Review · 2021

• Encryption Workarounds
  106 GEO. L.J. (2018) · Georgetown Law Journal · 2018
• Justice Scalia and the Criminal Law
  86 U. CIN. L. REV. 743 (2018) · University of Cincinnati Law Review · 2018
• The Effect of Legislation on Fourth Amendment Protection
  115 MICH. L. REV. 1117 (2017) · Michigan Law Review · 2017
• "Katz" Has Only One Step: The Irrelevance of Subjective Expectations
  82 U. CHI. L. REV. (2015) · University of Chicago Law Review · 2015
• The Fourth Amendment and the Global Internet
  67 STAN. L. REV. (2015) · Stanford Law Review · 2015
• The Mosaic Theory of the Fourth Amendment
  111 MICH. L. REV. 311 (2012) · Michigan Law Review · 2012
• The Curious History of Fourth Amendment Searches
  2012 SUP. CT. REV. (2012) · Supreme Court Review · 2012
• Vagueness Challenges to the Computer Fraud and Abuse Act
  94 MINN. L. REV. 1561 (2010) · Minnesota Law Review · 2010
• Four Models of Fourth Amendment Protection
  60 STAN. L. REV. (2010) · Stanford Law Review · 2010
• Applying the Fourth Amendment to the Internet
  62 STAN. L. REV. (2010) · Stanford Law Review · 2010
• Fourth Amendment Seizures of Computer Data
  119 YALE L.J. 700 (2010) · Yale Law Journal · 2010

• The Limits of Fourth Amendment Injunctions
  7 COLO. TECH. L.J. 127 (2009) · Colorado Technology Law Journal · 2009
• The Case for the Third-Party Doctrine
  107 MICH. L. REV. 561 (2009) · Michigan Law Review · 2009
• Do We Need a New Fourth Amendment?
  107 MICH. L. REV. 951 (2009) · Michigan Law Review · 2009
• The National Surveillance State: A Response to Balkin
  93 MINN. L. REV. HEADNOTES 2179 (2009) · Minnesota Law Review Headnotes · 2009
• The National Surveillance State: A Response to Balkin
  93 MINN. L. REV. 2179 (2009) · Minnesota Law Review · 2009
• Defending the Third-Party Doctrine: A Response to Epstein and Murphy
  24 BERKELEY TECH. L.J. 1229 (2009) · Berkeley Technology Law Journal · 2009
• Criminal Law in Virtual Worlds
  2008 U. CHI. LEGAL F. (2008) · University of Chicago Legal Forum · 2008
• Updating the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act
  75 U. CHI. L. REV. (2008) · University of Chicago Law Review · 2008
• Enforcing Law Online (reviewing <i>Who Controls the Internet?: Illusions of a Borderless World</i> by Jack Goldsmith, Tim Wu)
  74 U. CHI. L. REV. (2007) · University of Chicago Law Review · 2007
• Blogs and the Legal Academy
  84 WASH. U. L. REV. 1127 (2006) · Washington University Law Review · 2006
• Congress, the Courts, and New Technologies: A Response to Professor Solove
  74 FORDHAM L. REV. 779 (2005) · Fordham Law Review · 2005
• The Fourth Amendment and New Technologies: Constitutional Myths and the Case for Caution
  102 MICH. L. REV. 801 (2004) · Michigan Law Review · 2004
• Technology, Privacy, and the Courts: A Reply to Colb and Swire
  102 MICH. L. REV. 933 (2004) · Michigan Law Review · 2004
• Lifting the "Fog" of Internet Surveillance: How a Suppression Remedy Would Change Computer Crime Law
  54 UC L.J. 805 (2003) · UC Law Journal · 2003
• Are We Overprotecting Code? Thoughts on First-Generation Internet Law
  57 WASH. & LEE L. REV. 1287 (2000) · Washington and Lee Law Review · 2000
• Rethinking Patent Law in the Administrative State
  42 WM. & MARY L. REV. 127 (2000) · William & Mary Law Review · 2000

• The Decline of the Socratic Method at Harvard
  78 NEB. L. REV. (1999) · Nebraska Law Review · 1999