Michael A. Carrier

Publications

• Settlements and Causation
  56 SETON HALL L. REV. (2026) · Seton Hall Law Review · 2026
• Of Labor, Antitrust, and Why the Proposed <i>House</i> Settlement Will Not Solve the NCAA’s Problem
  93 FORDHAM L. REV. 1603 (2025) · Fordham Law Review · 2025
• A Surprising Reason the Reverse-Payment Caselaw Has Not Developed
  28 J. HEALTH CARE L. & POL'Y (2025) · Journal of Health Care Law and Policy · 2025
• The Missing Caselaw of Reverse-Payment Settlements
  98 ST. JOHN'S L. REV. (2025) · St. John's Law Review · 2025
• Rule or Reason? The Role of Balancing in Antitrust Law
  100 NOTRE DAME L. REV. REFLECTION 139 (2025) · Notre Dame Law Review Reflection · 2025
• Why Is FRAND Hard?
  2023 UTAH L. REV. (2023) · Utah Law Review · 2023
• How the Federal Trade Commission Can Use Section 5 To Strengthen the Right to Repair
  37 BERKELEY TECH. L.J. 1145 (2022) · Berkeley Technology Law Journal · 2022
• Don't Die! How Biosimilar Disparagement Violates Antitrust Law
  Northwestern University Law Review · 2020
• THREE CHALLENGES FOR PHARMACEUTICAL ANTITRUST
  59 SANTA CLARA L. REV. 615 (2020) · Santa Clara Law Review · 2020
• Playing Both Sides? Branded Sales, Generic Drugs, and Antitrust Policy
  71 UC L.J. 307 (2020) · UC Law Journal · 2020

• College Athletics: The Chink in the Seventh Circuit's "Law and Economics" Armor
  117 MICH. L. REV. ONLINE 90 (2019) · Michigan Law Review Online · 2019
• Citizen Petitions: Long, Late-Filed, and At-Last Denied
  66 AM. U. L. REV. (2017) · American University Law Review · 2017
• Sharing, Samples, and Generics: an Antitrust Framework
  103 CORNELL L. REV. (2017) · Cornell Law Review · 2017
• Using Antitrust Law to Challenge Turing's Daraprim Price Increase
  31 BERKELEY TECH. L.J. 1379 (2017) · Berkeley Technology Law Journal · 2017
• Sharing, Samples, and Generics: an Antitrust Framework
  103 CORNELL L. REV. 1 (2017) · Cornell Law Review · 2017
• Why a "Large and Unjustified" Payment Threshold Is Not Consistent with <i>Actavis</i>
  91 WASH. L. REV. 109 (2016) · Washington Law Review · 2016
• Product Hopping: A New Framework
  92 NOTRE DAME L. REV. (2016) · Notre Dame Law Review · 2016
• How Not to Apply the Rule of Reason: The <em>O’Bannon</em> Case
  114 MICH. L. REV. FIRST IMPRESSIONS 73 (2015) · Michigan Law Review First Impressions · 2015
• <em>O’Bannon v. National Collegiate Athletic Association</em>: Why the Ninth Circuit Should Not Block the Floodgates of Change in College Athletics
  71 WASH. & LEE L. REV. ONLINE 299 (2015) · Washington and Lee Law Review Online · 2015
• How Not to Apply Actavis
  109 NW. U. L. REV. (2014) · Northwestern University Law Review · 2014
• A Response to Chief Justice Roberts: Why Antitrust Must Play a Role in the Analysis of Drug Patent Settlements
  15 MINN. J. L. SCI. & TECH. 31 (2014) · Minnesota Journal of Law, Science & Technology · 2014
• Increasing Innovation Through Copyright Common Sense and Better Government Policy
  62 EMORY L.J. 983 (2013) · Emory Law Journal · 2013
• SOPA, PIPA, ACTA, TPP: An Alphabet Soup of Innovation-Stifling Copyright Legislation and Agreements
  11 NW. J. TECH. & INTELL. PROP. 21 (2013) · Northwestern Journal of Technology and Intellectual Property · 2013
• Citizen Petitions: An Empirical Study
  34 CARDOZO L. REV. 249 (2012) · Cardozo Law Review · 2012
• Provigil: A Case Study of Anticompetitive Behavior
  3 HASTINGS SCI. & TECH. L.J. 441 (2011) · UC Law Science and Technology Journal · 2011
• An Antitrust Framework for Climate Change
  9 NW. J. TECH. & INTELL. PROP. 513 (2011) · Northwestern Journal of Technology and Intellectual Property · 2011
• A Real-World Analysis of Pharmaceutical Settlements: The Missing Dimension of Product Hopping
  62 FLA. L. REV. 1009 (2010) · Florida Law Review · 2010

• Unsettling Drug Patent Settlements: A Framework for Presumptive Illegality
  108 MICH. L. REV. 37 (2009) · Michigan Law Review · 2009
• Against Cyberproperty
  22 BERKELEY TECH. L.J. 1485 (2007) · Berkeley Technology Law Journal · 2007
• Refusals to License Intellectual Property after Trinko
  55 DEPAUL L. REV. 1191 (2006) · DePaul Law Review · 2006
• Vote Counting, Technology, and Unintended Consequences
  79 ST. JOHN'S L. REV. (2006) · St. John's Law Review · 2006
• Cabining Intellectual Property through a Property Paradigm
  54 DUKE L.J. (2004) · Duke Law Journal · 2004
• Resolving the Patent-Antitrust Paradox Through Tripartite Innovation
  56 VAND. L. REV. 1047 (2003) · Vanderbilt Law Review · 2003
• Why Antitrust Should Defer to the Intellectual Property Rules of Standard-Setting Organizations: A Commentary on Teece and Sherry
  87 MINN. L. REV. 2019 (2003) · Minnesota Law Review · 2003
• Unraveling the Patent-Antitrust Paradox
  150 U. PENN. L. REV. 761 (2002) · University of Pennsylvania Law Review · 2002

• The Real Rule of Reason: Bridging the Disconnect
  1999 BYU L. REV. 1265 (1999) · BYU Law Review · 1999
• Justice Oliver Wendell Holmes: Law and the Inner Self
  93 MICH. L. REV. 1894 (1995) · Michigan Law Review · 1995
• Review Article
  93 MICH. L. REV. 1894 (1995) · Michigan Law Review · 1995
• When Is the Senate in Recess for Purposes of the Recess Appointment Clause?
  92 MICH. L. REV. 2204 (1994) · Michigan Law Review · 1994
• When Is the Senate in Recess for Purposes of the Recess Appointments Clause?
  92 MICH. L. REV. 2204 (1994) · Michigan Law Review · 1994