Mary E. Ziegler

Publications

• “For Their Benefit”: The Lost History of Parental Consent and Minors’ Rights
  114 CAL. L. REV. 647 (2026) · California Law Review · 2026
• Retrenchment by Diversion: the New Politics of Parental Rights
  123 MICH. L. REV. 669 (2025) · Michigan Law Review · 2025
• Children at Work, Parental Rights—and Rhetoric
  77 ARK. L. REV. 257 (2024) · Arkansas Law Review · 2024
• Canary in a Coal Mine: What It Means to Lose a Constitutional Right
  39 GA. ST. U. L. REV. 951 (2023) · Georgia State University Law Review · 2023
• Fracture: Abortion Law and Politics After <em>Dobbs</em>
  76 SMU L. REV. 27 (2023) · SMU Law Review · 2023
• Unsettled Law: Social-Movement Conflict, Stare Decisis, and Roe v. Wade
  Connecticut Law Review · 2022
• Contesting the Legacy of the Nineteenth Amendment: Abortion and Equality From Roe to the Present
  92 U. COLO. L. REV. 751 (2021) · University of Colorado Law Review · 2021
• Men's Reproductive Rights: A Legal History
  47 PEPP. L. REV. 665 (2020) · Pepperdine Law Review · 2020

• Beyond Balancing: Rethinking the Law of Embryo Disposition
  68 AM. U. L. REV. (2018) · American University Law Review · 2018
• After Life: Governmental Interests and the New Antiabortion Incrementalism
  73 U. MIAMI L. REV. 78 (2018) · University of Miami Law Review · 2018
• What Is Race?: The New Constitutional Politics of Affirmative Action
  Connecticut Law Review · 2018
• Navigating Controversial Fourteenth Amendment Topics
  62 ST. LOUIS U. L.J. (2018) · Saint Louis University Law Journal · 2018
• What is Sexual Orientation?
  106 KY. L.J. (2018) · Kentucky Law Journal · 2018
• The New Negative Rights: Abortion Funding and Constitutional Law After <i>Whole Woman’s Health</i>
  96 NEB. L. REV. 577 (2018) · Nebraska Law Review · 2018
• Some Form of Punishment: Penalizing Women for Abortion
  26 WM. & MARY BILL RTS. J. 735 (2018) · William & Mary Bill of Rights Journal · 2018
• The Disability Politics of Abortion
  2017 UTAH L. REV. (2017) · Utah Law Review · 2017
• Reproducing Rights: Reconsidering the Costs of Constitutional Discourse
  28 YALE J. L. & FEMINISM (2017) · Yale Journal of Law & Feminism · 2017
• Perceiving Orientation: Defining Sexuality After Obergefell
  23 DUKE J. GENDER L. & POL'Y 223 (2016) · Duke Journal of Gender Law & Policy · 2016
• The Conservative Magna Carta
  94 N. C. L. REV. 1653 (2016) · North Carolina Law Review · 2016
• Substantial Uncertainty: Whole Woman’s Health v Hellerstedt and the Future of Abortion Law
  2016 SUP. CT. REV. (2016) · Supreme Court Review · 2016
• Roe's Race: The Supreme Court, Population Control, and Reproductive Justice
  25 YALE J. L. & FEMINISM 1 (2016) · Yale Journal of Law & Feminism · 2016
• Identity Contests: Litigation and the Meaning of Social- Movement Causes
  86 U. COLO. L. REV. 1273 (2015) · University of Colorado Law Review · 2015
• Choice at Work: Young v. United Parcel Service, Pregnancy Discrimination, and Reproductive Liberty
  93 DENV. L. REV. 219 (2015) · Denver Law Review · 2015
• The (Non)-Right to Sex
  69 U. MIAMI L. REV. 631 (2015) · University of Miami Law Review · 2015
• Originalism Talk: A Legal History
  2014 BYU L. REV. 869 (2014) · BYU Law Review · 2014
• Abortion and the Constitutional Right (Not) To Procreate
  48 U. RICH. L. REV. 1263 (2014) · University of Richmond Law Review · 2014
• Beyond Backlash: Legal History, Polarization, and <em>Roe v. Wade</em>
  71 WASH. & LEE L. REV. 969 (2014) · Washington and Lee Law Review · 2014
• An Incomplete Revolution: Feminists and the Legacy of Marital-Property Reform
  19 MICH. J. GENDER & L. 259 (2013) · Michigan Journal of Gender & Law · 2013
• Session 1
  Washington and Lee Law Review · 2013
• Women's Rights on the Right: The History and Stakes of Modern Pro-Life Feminism
  28 BERKELEY J. GENDER L. & JUST. (2013) · Berkeley Journal of Gender, Law & Justice · 2013
• Sexing <em>Harris</em>: The Law and Politics of the Movement to Defund Planned Parenthood
  60 BUFF. L. REV. 701 (2012) · Buffalo Law Review · 2012
• The Terms of the Debate: Litigation, Argumentative Strategies, and Coalitions in the Same-Sex Marriage Struggle
  39 FLA. ST. U. L. REV. (2012) · Florida State University Law Review · 2012
• The Possibility of Compromise: Antiabortion Moderates after <em>Roe v. Wade</em>, 1973–1980
  87 CHI.-KENT. L. REV. 571 (2012) · Chicago-Kent Law Review · 2012
• Edelin: The Remaking of the Headline Abortion Trial
  55 ST. LOUIS U. L.J. (2011) · Saint Louis University Law Journal · 2011
• Framing Change: Cause Lawyering, Constitutional Decisions, and Social Change
  94 MARQ. L. REV. 263 (2010) · Marquette Law Review · 2010

• Ways to Change: A Reevaluation of Article V Campaigns and Legislative Constitutionalism
  2009 BYU L. REV. 969 (2009) · BYU Law Review · 2009
• RETHINKING AN UNDUE BURDEN: WHOLE WOMAN'S HEALTHS NEW APPROACH TO FUNDAMENTAL RIGHTS
  85 TENN. L. REV. (2009) · Tennessee Law Review · 2009
• Reinventing Eugenics: Reproductive Choice and Law Reform After World War II
  14 CARDOZO J. EQUAL RTS. & SOC. JUST. 319 (2008) · Cardozo Journal of Equal Rights & Social Justice · 2008
• Understanding and Protecting Natural Resources
  17 DUKE ENVTL. L. & POL'Y F. 119 (2006) · Duke Environmental Law & Policy Forum · 2006