Lawrence D. Rosenthal

Publications

• Originalism Chokes: The 2024 Trump Cases
  53 UC L. CONST. Q. 405 (2026) · UC Law Constitutional Quarterly · 2026
• Litigating Original Meaning from Heller to Rahimi: The Role of Lawyering in the Confused Path of Second Amendment Jurisprudence
  73 AM. U. L. REV. (2024) · American University Law Review · 2024
• “You Don’t Bring Me Flowers Anymore”: President Clinton, Paula Jones, and Why Courts Should Expand the Definition of “Adverse Employment Action” Under Title VII’s Anti-Retaliation Provision
  96 ST. JOHN'S L. REV. (2023) · St. John's Law Review · 2023
• Is Protecting an Employee's Right to Knowingly File False EEOC Charges a Necessary Evil?
  54 LOY. L. A. L. REV. 1151 (2021) · Loyola of Los Angeles Law Review · 2021
• Eyewitness Identification and the Problematics of Blackstonian Reform of the Criminal Law
  110 J. CRIM. L. & CRIMINOLOGY 181 (2020) · Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology · 2020
• Defining Qualified Immunity
  72 S. C. L. REV. (2020) · South Carolina Law Review · 2020

• An Empirical Inquiry into the Use of Originalism: Fourth Amendment Jurisprudence During the Career of Justice Scalia
  70 UC L.J. 75 (2019) · UC Law Journal · 2019
• Timing Isn't Everything: Establishing a Title VII Retaliation Prima Facie Case After <em>University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center v. Nassar</em>
  69 SMU L. REV. 143 (2016) · SMU Law Review · 2016
• No Good Deed Goes Unpunished: The Lack of Protection for Volunteers Under Federal Anti-Discrimination Statutes
  2016 BYU L. REV. 117 (2016) · BYU Law Review · 2016
• The Statement and Account Clause as a National Security Freedom of Information Act
  47 LOY. U. CHI. L.J. 1 (2015) · Loyola University Chicago Law Journal · 2015
• The Limits of Second Amendment Originalism and the Constitutional Case for Gun Control
  92 WASH. U. L. REV. 1187 (2015) · Washington University Law Review · 2015
• Binary Searches and the Central Meaning of the Fourth Amendment
  22 WM. & MARY BILL RTS. J. 881 (2014) · William & Mary Bill of Rights Journal · 2014
• Saving Disparate Impact
  34 CARDOZO L. REV. 2157 (2013) · Cardozo Law Review · 2013
• The Supreme Court's Interpretation of the Fair Labor Standards Act's Anti-Retaliation Provision in <i>Kasten v. Saint- Gobain Performance Plastics Corporation</i>: Putting Policy Over Plain Language?
  64 MERCER L. REV. (2013) · Mercer Law Review · 2013
• Originalism in Practice
  87 IND. L.J. (2012) · Indiana Law Journal · 2012
• McDonald v. Chicago: Which Standard of Scrutiny Should Apply to Gun Control Laws?
  105 NW. U. L. REV. 437 (2011) · Northwestern University Law Review · 2011
• First Amendment Investigations and the Inescapable Pragmatism of the Common Law of Free Speech
  86 IND. L.J. (2011) · Indiana Law Journal · 2011
• McDonald v. Chicago: Which Standard of Scrutiny Should Apply to Gun-Control Laws?
  Northwestern University Law Review · 2010

• Second Thoughts on Damages for Wrongful Convictions
  85 CHI.-KENT. L. REV. 127 (2009) · Chicago-Kent Law Review · 2009
• Adding Insult to No Injury: The Denial of Attorney's Fees to "Victorious" Employment Discrimination and Other Civil Rights Plaintiffs
  37 FLA. ST. U. L. REV. (2009) · Florida State University Law Review · 2009
• The Emerging First Amendment Law of Managerial Prerogative
  77 FORDHAM L. REV. 33 (2008) · Fordham Law Review · 2008
• Reading Too Much into What the Court <i>Doesn't</i> Write: How Some Federal Courts Have Limited Title VII's Participation Clause's Protections after <i>Clark County School District v. Breeden</i>
  83 WASH. L. REV. 345 (2008) · Washington Law Review · 2008
• Does Due Process Have an Original Meaning? On Originalism, Due Process, Procedural Innovation...and Parking Tickets
  60 OKLA. L. REV. (2007) · Oklahoma Law Review · 2007
• Reasonable Accommodations for Individuals Regarded as Having Disabilities Under the Americans with Disabilities Act? Why "No" Should Not Be the Answer
  36 SETON HALL L. REV. (2006) · Seton Hall Law Review · 2006
• Can't Stomach the Americans with Disabilities Act? How the Federal Courts Have Gutted Disability Discrimination Legislation in Cases Involving Individuals with Gastrointestinal Disorders and Other Hidden Illnesses
  53 CATH. U. L. REV. 449 (2004) · Catholic University Law Review · 2004
• Policing and Equal Protection
  21 YALE L. & POL'Y REV. 53 (2003) · Yale Law & Policy Review · 2003
• Requiring Individuals to Use Mitigating Measures in Reasonable Accommodation Cases After the Sutton Trilogy: Putting the Brakes on a Potential Runaway Train
  54 S. C. L. REV. (2002) · South Carolina Law Review · 2002
• Motions for Summary Judgment When Employers Offer Multiple Justifications for Adverse Employment Actions: Why the Exceptions Should Swallow the Rule
  2002 UTAH L. REV. (2002) · Utah Law Review · 2002
• Gang Loitering and Race
  91 J. CRIM. L. & CRIMINOLOGY 99 (2000) · Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology · 2000

• Permissible Content Discrimination under the First Amendment: The Strange case of the Public Employee
  25 UC L. CONST. Q. 529 (1998) · UC Law Constitutional Quarterly · 1998