Laura K. Donohue

Publications

• Hester's Dubious Roots and Legacy: Open Fields Doctrine Under Scrutiny
  13 TEX. A & M L. REV. 861 (2026) · Texas A&M Law Review · 2026
• The National Security Administrative State
  78 STAN. L. REV. 1449 (2026) · Stanford Law Review · 2026
• Biomanipulation
  113 GEO. L.J. (2025) · Georgetown Law Journal · 2025
• The Common Law and First Amendment Qualified Right of Public Access to Foreign Intelligence Law
  112 GEO. L.J. (2024) · Georgetown Law Journal · 2024
• Federal Courts: Article I, II, III, and IV Adjudication
  71 CATH. U. L. REV. 543 (2022) · Catholic University Law Review · 2022
• Surveillance, State Secrets, and the Future of Constitutional Rights
  2022 SUP. CT. REV. (2022) · Supreme Court Review · 2022

• The Original Fourth Amendment
  83 U. CHI. L. REV. (2016) · University of Chicago Law Review · 2016
• Panel II: New Technologies Expanding the Frontiers of National Security: Emerging Technologies, Issues, and Guidance
  Emory Law Journal · 2016
• High Technology, Consumer Privacy, And U.S. National Security
  4 AM. U. BUS. L. REV. (2014) · American University Business Law Review · 2014
• Biodefense and Constitutional Constraints
  4 U. MIAMI NAT'L SECURITY & ARMED CONFLICT L. REV. 82 (2014) · University of Miami National Security & Armed Conflict Law Review · 2014
• Technological Leap, Statutory Gap, and Constitutional Abyss: Remote Biometric Identification Comes of Age
  97 MINN. L. REV. 407 (2012) · Minnesota Law Review · 2012
• Terrorism and Trial by Jury
  59 STAN. L. REV. (2010) · Stanford Law Review · 2010

• The Perilous Dialogue
  97 CAL. L. REV. 357 (2009) · California Law Review · 2009
• Anglo-American Privacy and Surveillance
  96 J. CRIM. L. & CRIMINOLOGY 1059 (2006) · Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology · 2006
• Anti-Terrorist Finance in the United Kingdom and United States
  27 MICH. J. INT'L L. 303 (2006) · Michigan Journal of International Law · 2006
• Terrorist Speech and the Future of Free Expression
  27 CARDOZO L. REV. 233 (2005) · Cardozo Law Review · 2005