Kevin M. Clermont

Publications

• A Theory for Evaluating Evidence Against the Standard of Proof
  127 PENN ST. L. REV. (2023) · Penn State Law Review (2003 - Present) · 2023
• Rules, Standards, and Such
  68 BUFF. L. REV. 751 (2020) · Buffalo Law Review · 2020
• A Theory of Factfinding: The Logic for Processing Evidence
  104 MARQ. L. REV. 351 (2020) · Marquette Law Review · 2020

• Staying Faithful to the Standards of Proof
  104 CORNELL L. REV. 1457 (2019) · Cornell Law Review · 2019
• Degrees of Deference: Applying vs. Adopting Another Sovereign's Law
  103 CORNELL L. REV. 243 (2018) · Cornell Law Review · 2018
• Common Sense on Standards of Proof
  48 SETON HALL L. REV. (2018) · Seton Hall Law Review · 2018
• Trial by Traditional Probability, Relative Plausibility, or Belief Function?
  66 CASE W. RES. L. REV. 353 (2015) · Case Western Reserve Law Review · 2015
• Governing Law on Forum-Selection Agreements
  66 UC L.J. 643 (2015) · UC Law Journal · 2015
• Solving the Puzzle of Transnational Class Actions
  90 IND. L.J. (2015) · Indiana Law Journal · 2015
• Plaintiphobia in the Supreme Court
  100 CORNELL L. REV. 193 (2014) · Cornell Law Review · 2014
• Death of Paradox: The Killer Logic beneath the Standards of Proof
  88 NOTRE DAME L. REV. 1061 (2013) · Notre Dame Law Review · 2013
• Aggregation of Probabilities and Illogic
  47 GA. L. REV. (2012) · Georgia Law Review · 2012
• The Repressible Myth of Shady Grove
  86 NOTRE DAME L. REV. 987 (2011) · Notre Dame Law Review · 2011
• Sequencing the Issues for Judicial Decisionmaking: Limitations from Jurisdictional Primacy and Intrasuit Preclusion
  63 FLA. L. REV. 301 (2011) · Florida Law Review · 2011

• Litigation Realities Redux
  84 NOTRE DAME L. REV. 1919 (2009) · Notre Dame Law Review · 2009
• Jurisdictional Fact
  91 CORNELL L. REV. 973 (2006) · Cornell Law Review · 2006
• Exorbitant Jurisdiction
  58 ME. L. REV. 473 (2006) · Maine Law Review · 2006
• Reverse-Erie
  82 NOTRE DAME L. REV. (2006) · Notre Dame Law Review · 2006
• Standards of Proof in Japan and the United States
  37 CORNELL INT'L L.J. 263 (2004) · Cornell International Law Journal · 2004
• A Global Law of Jurisdiction and Judgements: Views from the United States and Japan
  37 CORNELL INT'L L.J. (2004) · Cornell International Law Journal · 2004
• Common-Law Compulsory Counterclaim Rule: Creating Effective and Elegant Res Judicata Doctrine
  79 NOTRE DAME L. REV. 1745 (2004) · Notre Dame Law Review · 2004
• Teaching Civil Procedure Through Its Top Ten Cases, Plus or Minus Two
  47 ST. LOUIS U. L.J. (2003) · Saint Louis University Law Journal · 2003
• Litigation Realities
  88 CORNELL L. REV. 119 (2002) · Cornell Law Review · 2002
• Judge Harry Edwards: A Case in Point!
  80 WASH. U. L. REV. 1275 (2002) · Washington University Law Review · 2002

• Jurisdictional Salvation and the Hague Treaty
  85 CORNELL L. REV. 89 (1999) · Cornell Law Review · 1999
• Do Case Outcomes Really Reveal Anything About the Legal System? Win Rates and Removal Jurisdiction
  83 CORNELL L. REV. 581 (1998) · Cornell Law Review · 1998
• Simplifying the Choice of Forum: A Reply
  75 WASH. U. L. REV. 1551 (1997) · Washington University Law Review · 1997
• Exorcising the Evil of Forum-Shopping
  80 CORNELL L. REV. 1507 (1995) · Cornell Law Review · 1995
• Trial by Jury or Judge: Transcending Empiricism
  77 CORNELL L. REV. 1124 (1992) · Cornell Law Review · 1992

• Procedure’s Magical Number Three Psychological Bases for Standards of Decision
  72 CORNELL L. REV. 1115 (1987) · Cornell Law Review · 1987
• Surveying Work Product
  68 CORNELL L. REV. 755 (1983) · Cornell Law Review · 1983
• Restating Territorial Jurisdiction and Venue for State and Federal Courts
  66 CORNELL L. REV. 411 (1981) · Cornell Law Review · 1981

• Improving on the Contingent Fee
  63 CORNELL L. REV. 529 (1978) · Cornell Law Review · 1978