Kenneth Culp Davis

Publications

• Panel V: The Role of the Courts in Separation of Powers Disputes
  68 WASH. U. L. REV. 667 (1990) · Washington University Law Review · 1990

• "No Law to Apply"
  25 SAN DIEGO L. REV. 1 (1988) · San Diego Law Review · 1988
• Judicial, Legislative, and Administrative Lawmaking: A Proposed Research Service for the Supreme Court
  71 MINN. L. REV. 1 (1986) · Minnesota Law Review · 1986
• Nathaniel L. Nathanson
  22 SAN DIEGO L. REV. 423 (1985) · San Diego Law Review · 1985
• Facts in Lawmaking
  80 COLUM. L. REV. 931 (1980) · Columbia Law Review · 1980
• Review Article
  80 COLUM. L. REV. 1149 (1980) · Columbia Law Review · 1980
• Administrative Common Law and the Vermont Yankee Opinion
  1980 UTAH L. REV. (1980) · Utah Law Review · 1980

• The Goss Principle
  16 SAN DIEGO L. REV. 289 (1979) · San Diego Law Review · 1979
• Dialogue On Police Rulemaking
  125 U. PENN. L. REV. 1167 (1977) · University of Pennsylvania Law Review · 1977
• Administrative Law Surprises in the "Ruiz" Case
  75 COLUM. L. REV. 823 (1975) · Columbia Law Review · 1975
• Review Article
  72 COLUM. L. REV. 432 (1972) · Columbia Law Review · 1972
• Hearsay in Nonjury Cases
  83 HARV. L. REV. 1362 (1970) · Harvard Law Review · 1970
• Review Article
  68 MICH. L. REV. 789 (1970) · Michigan Law Review · 1970
• The Liberalized Law of Standing
  37 U. CHI. L. REV. (1970) · University of Chicago Law Review · 1970

• A New Approach to Delegation
  36 U. CHI. L. REV. (1969) · University of Chicago Law Review · 1969
• The Case of the Real Taxpayer: A Reply to Professor Bittker
  36 U. CHI. L. REV. (1969) · University of Chicago Law Review · 1969
• Standing: Taxpayers and Others
  35 U. CHI. L. REV. (1968) · University of Chicago Law Review · 1968
• Review Article
  80 HARV. L. REV. 1833 (1967) · Harvard Law Review · 1967
• The Information Act: A Preliminary Analysis
  34 U. CHI. L. REV. (1967) · University of Chicago Law Review · 1967
• Administrative Arbitrariness Is Not Always Reviewable
  51 MINN. L. REV. 643 (1967) · Minnesota Law Review · 1967
• "Judicial Control of Administrative Action": A Review
  66 COLUM. L. REV. 635 (1966) · Columbia Law Review · 1966
• Administrative Arbitrariness
  114 U. PENN. L. REV. 823 (1966) · University of Pennsylvania Law Review · 1966
• Administrative Arbitrariness-A Final Wor
  114 U. PENN. L. REV. 814 (1966) · University of Pennsylvania Law Review · 1966
• Review Article
  54 CAL. L. REV. 1392 (1966) · California Law Review · 1966
• Administrative Procedure in the Regulation of Banking
  31 LAW & CONTEMP. PROBS. 713 (1966) · Law and Contemporary Problems · 1966
• Administrative Law Treatise: 1963 Pocket Parts
  17 STAN. L. REV. 165 (1964) · Stanford Law Review · 1964
• Review Article
  75 HARV. L. REV. 1258 (1962) · Harvard Law Review · 1962
• Nuclear Facilities Licensing: Another View
  110 U. PENN. L. REV. 371 (1962) · University of Pennsylvania Law Review · 1962
• Suing the Government by Falsely Pretending to Sue an Officer
  29 U. CHI. L. REV. (1962) · University of Chicago Law Review · 1962
• The Future of Judge-Made Public Law in England: A Problem of Practical Jurisprudence
  61 COLUM. L. REV. 201 (1961) · Columbia Law Review · 1961
• Ombudsmen in America: Officers to Criticize Administrative Action
  109 U. PENN. L. REV. 1057 (1961) · University of Pennsylvania Law Review · 1961
• Review Article
  70 YALE L.J. 1210 (1961) · Yale Law Journal · 1961
• Review Article
  73 HARV. L. REV. 1638 (1960) · Harvard Law Review · 1960
• Review Article
  48 CAL. L. REV. 356 (1960) · California Law Review · 1960

• Review Article
  59 COLUM. L. REV. 214 (1959) · Columbia Law Review · 1959
• The Requirement of a Trial-Type Hearing
  70 HARV. L. REV. 193 (1956) · Harvard Law Review · 1956
• Administrative Officers' Tort Liability
  55 MICH. L. REV. 201 (1956) · Michigan Law Review · 1956
• Tort Liability of Governmental Units
  40 MINN. L. REV. 751 (1956) · Minnesota Law Review · 1956
• Ripeness of Governmental Action for Judicial Review
  68 HARV. L. REV. 1122 (1955) · Harvard Law Review · 1955
• Ripeness of Governmental Action for Judicial Review
  68 HARV. L. REV. 1326 (1955) · Harvard Law Review · 1955
• Judicial Notice
  55 COLUM. L. REV. 945 (1955) · Columbia Law Review · 1955
• Government Officers as Defendants: Two Troublesome Problems
  104 U. PENN. L. REV. 69 (1955) · University of Pennsylvania Law Review · 1955
• The Residuum Rule in Administrative Law
  28 U. COLO. L. REV. (1955) · University of Colorado Law Review · 1955
• Mandatory Relief from Administrative Action in the Federal Courts
  22 U. CHI. L. REV. (1955) · University of Chicago Law Review · 1955
• Standing to Challenge Governmental Action
  39 MINN. L. REV. 353 (1955) · Minnesota Law Review · 1955
• Sovereign Immunity in Suits Against Officers for Relief Other Than Damages
  40 CORNELL L. REV. 3 (1954) · Cornell Law Review · 1954
• Review Article
  52 COLUM. L. REV. 299 (1952) · Columbia Law Review · 1952
• Review Article
  61 YALE L.J. 283 (1952) · Yale Law Journal · 1952
• Review Article
  40 CAL. L. REV. 170 (1952) · California Law Review · 1952
• Review Article
  40 CAL. L. REV. 173 (1952) · California Law Review · 1952
• Chief Justice Wolfe on Administrative Law
  3 UTAH L. REV. (1952) · Utah Law Review · 1952
• Administrative Findings, Reasons, and Stare Decisis
  38 CAL. L. REV. 218 (1950) · California Law Review · 1950
• Scope of Review of Federal Administrative Action
  50 COLUM. L. REV. 559 (1950) · Columbia Law Review · 1950
• Evidence Reform: The Administrative Process Leads the Way
  34 MINN. L. REV. 581 (1950) · Minnesota Law Review · 1950

• Official Notice
  62 HARV. L. REV. 537 (1949) · Harvard Law Review · 1949
• Administrative Powers of Supervising, Prosecuting, Advising, Declaring, and Informally Adjudicating
  63 HARV. L. REV. 193 (1949) · Harvard Law Review · 1949
• Standing to Challenge and to Enforce Administrative Action
  49 COLUM. L. REV. 759 (1949) · Columbia Law Review · 1949
• Separation of Functions in Administrative Agencies. III. Interpreting the Administrative Procedure Act
  61 HARV. L. REV. 612 (1948) · Harvard Law Review · 1948
• Separation of Functions in Administrative Agencies
  61 HARV. L. REV. 389 (1948) · Harvard Law Review · 1948
• Institutional Administrative Decisions
  48 COLUM. L. REV. 173 (1948) · Columbia Law Review · 1948
• Nonreviewable Administrative Action
  96 U. PENN. L. REV. 749 (1948) · University of Pennsylvania Law Review · 1948
• Bias of Administrative Officers
  32 MINN. L. REV. 199 (1948) · Minnesota Law Review · 1948
• Book Reviews
  20 U. COLO. L. REV. 110 (1947) · University of Colorado Law Review · 1947
• A Final Word on the Doctrine of the Hodges Case
  45 W. VA. L. REV. (1943) · West Virginia Law Review · 1943
• An Approach to Problems of Evidence in the Administrative Process
  55 HARV. L. REV. 364 (1942) · Harvard Law Review · 1942
• Dean Pound's Errors about Administrative Agencies
  42 COLUM. L. REV. 804 (1942) · Columbia Law Review · 1942
• Dean Pound and Administrative Law
  42 COLUM. L. REV. 89 (1942) · Columbia Law Review · 1942
• Review Article
  52 YALE L.J. 191 (1942) · Yale Law Journal · 1942
• Judicial Review of Administrative Action in West Virginia--A Study in Separation of Powers
  44 W. VA. L. REV. (1942) · West Virginia Law Review · 1942