John Andrew Maher

Publications

• National Cooperative Production Amendments of 1993: Limited Cartelism Invited!
  12 PENN ST. INT'L L. REV. 195 (1994) · Penn State International Law Review · 1994
• A Tribute to Honorable Dale F. Shughart
  98 DICK. L. REV. 351 (1994) · Dickinson Law Review (1908-2003) · 1994
• Panel Discussion, International Trade Organization: Economic Trends of an International Court of Justice Contrasting the Proposed ITO Arbitration Mechanisms With the Bilateral GATT Negotiations and Related Issues
  14 N. ILL. U. L. REV. 471 (1994) · Northern Illinois University Law Review · 1994
• Federal Superlien: An Alternative to Lender Liability Under CERCLA
  6 J. CIV. RTS. & ECON. DEV. (1994) · Journal of Civil Rights and Economic Development · 1994
• The Dickinson School of Law NAFTA Symposium - The North American Free Trade Agreement: Engaged To Be Engaged?
  11 PENN ST. INT'L L. REV. 553 (1993) · Penn State International Law Review · 1993

• National Cooperative Research Act of 1984: Cartelism for High-Tech Ventures (and Others?)
  7 PENN ST. INT'L L. REV. 1 (1988) · Penn State International Law Review · 1988
• Statutorily Implied Federal Causes of Action After Merrill Lynch: How Sad it is; How Simple it Could Be
  88 DICK. L. REV. 593 (1984) · Dickinson Law Review (1908-2003) · 1984
• Export Trade Certificates of Review: Will Efficacy be Permitted?
  2 PENN ST. INT'L L. REV. 241 (1984) · Penn State International Law Review · 1984
• Federally-Defined Judicial Immunity: Some Quixotic Reflections On An Unwarranted Imposition
  88 DICK. L. REV. 326 (1984) · Dickinson Law Review (1908-2003) · 1984
• The Rule of Law & FTC: Thesis & Antithesis? Some Proposals
  86 DICK. L. REV. 403 (1982) · Dickinson Law Review (1908-2003) · 1982
• Marine Transport, Cargo Risks, and the Hamburg Rules-Rationalization or Imagery?
  84 DICK. L. REV. 183 (1980) · Dickinson Law Review (1908-2003) · 1980
• Implied Private Rights of Action and the Federal Securities Laws: A Historical Perspective
  37 WASH. & LEE L. REV. 783 (1980) · Washington and Lee Law Review · 1980

• Draining the Alcoa "Wishing Well": The Section 2 Conduct Requirement after Kodak and Calcomp
  48 FORDHAM L. REV. 291 (1979) · Fordham Law Review · 1979
• Draining the Alcoa "Wishing Well": The Section 2 Conduct Requirement after Kodak and Calcomp
  49 FORDHAM L. REV. 291 (1979) · Fordham Law Review · 1979