Legal Scholar
James Schouler
Is this you?
Claim these 27 publications to build your verified CiteLaw profile.
Claim this profile
Publishes In
Columbia Law Review7
Michigan Law Review7
Yale Law Journal7
California Law Review3
Harvard Law Review3
Publications
1920s7
-
14 CAL. L. REV. 77 (1925) · California Law Review · 1925
-
33 YALE L.J. 451 (1924) · Yale Law Journal · 1924
-
22 MICH. L. REV. 859 (1924) · Michigan Law Review · 1924
-
23 COLUM. L. REV. 797 (1923) · Columbia Law Review · 1923
-
22 COLUM. L. REV. 88 (1922) · Columbia Law Review · 1922
-
20 MICH. L. REV. 924 (1922) · Michigan Law Review · 1922
-
10 CAL. L. REV. 439 (1922) · California Law Review · 1922
1910s7
-
27 YALE L.J. 855 (1918) · Yale Law Journal · 1918
-
16 MICH. L. REV. 668 (1918) · Michigan Law Review · 1918
-
16 COLUM. L. REV. 269 (1916) · Columbia Law Review · 1916
-
25 YALE L.J. 253 (1916) · Yale Law Journal · 1916
-
14 MICH. L. REV. 269 (1916) · Michigan Law Review · 1916
-
4 CAL. L. REV. 173 (1916) · California Law Review · 1916
-
20 YALE L.J. 463 (1911) · Yale Law Journal · 1911
1900s13
-
22 HARV. L. REV. 317 (1909) · Harvard Law Review · 1909
-
9 COLUM. L. REV. 565 (1909) · Columbia Law Review · 1909
-
7 MICH. L. REV. 367 (1909) · Michigan Law Review · 1909
-
18 YALE L.J. 140 (1908) · Yale Law Journal · 1908
-
19 HARV. L. REV. 228 (1906) · Harvard Law Review · 1906
-
6 COLUM. L. REV. 212 (1906) · Columbia Law Review · 1906
-
6 COLUM. L. REV. 604 (1906) · Columbia Law Review · 1906
-
4 MICH. L. REV. 337 (1906) · Michigan Law Review · 1906
-
19 HARV. L. REV. 149 (1905) · Harvard Law Review · 1905
-
15 YALE L.J. 49 (1905) · Yale Law Journal · 1905
-
15 YALE L.J. 48 (1905) · Yale Law Journal · 1905
-
4 MICH. L. REV. 175 (1905) · Michigan Law Review · 1905
-
1 COLUM. L. REV. 203 (1901) · Columbia Law Review · 1901
Are you James Schouler?
This page was assembled from published law review and journal records. Claim your work to turn it into a verified CiteLaw scholar profile, correct anything that is wrong, and add abstracts or full text where they are missing.
