James E. Fleming

Publications

• "What Shall Be Orthodox" in Polarized Times: Overview and Response to Commentators
  90 MO. L. REV. (2025) · Missouri Law Review · 2025

• Fidelity to Our Imperfect Constitution: A Response to Six Views
  31 CONST. COMMENT. 489 (2016) · Constitutional Commentary · 2016
• Fidelity To Our Living Constitution
  50 TULSA L. REV. 449 (2015) · Tulsa Law Review · 2015
• The Inclusiveness of the New Originalism
  82 FORDHAM L. REV. 433 (2013) · Fordham Law Review · 2013
• Ordered Liberty: A Response to Three Views
  28 CONST. COMMENT. 435 (2013) · Constitutional Commentary · 2013
• The New Originalist Manifesto
  28 CONST. COMMENT. 539 (2013) · Constitutional Commentary · 2013
• Presidential Succession: The Art of the Possible
  79 FORDHAM L. REV. 951 (2010) · Fordham Law Review · 2010

• Constitutional Theory and the Future of the Unitary Executive
  59 EMORY L.J. 459 (2009) · Emory Law Journal · 2009
• Rewriting Brown, Resurrecting Plessy
  52 ST. LOUIS U. L.J. (2008) · Saint Louis University Law Journal · 2008
• The Odyssey of Cass Sunstein
  43 TULSA L. REV. 843 (2008) · Tulsa Law Review · 2008
• The Incredible Shrinking Constitutional Theory: From the Partial Constitution to the Minimal Constitution
  75 FORDHAM L. REV. 2885 (2007) · Fordham Law Review · 2007
• The Balkanization of Originalism
  67 MD. L. REV. 10 (2007) · Maryland Law Review · 2007
• "There is Only One Equal Protection Clause": An Appreciation of Justice Stevens's Equal Protection Jurisprudence
  74 FORDHAM L. REV. 2301 (2006) · Fordham Law Review · 2006
• The New Constitutional Order and the Heartening of Conservative Constitutional Aspirations
  75 FORDHAM L. REV. 537 (2006) · Fordham Law Review · 2006
• Judicial Review Without Judicial Supremacy: Taking the Constitution Seriously Outside the Courts
  73 FORDHAM L. REV. 1377 (2005) · Fordham Law Review · 2005
• Securing Deliberative Democracy
  72 FORDHAM L. REV. 1435 (2004) · Fordham Law Review · 2004
• Lawrence's Republic
  39 TULSA L. REV. 563 (2004) · Tulsa Law Review · 2004
• The Missing Selves in Constitutional Self-Government
  71 FORDHAM L. REV. 1789 (2003) · Fordham Law Review · 2003
• The Lawyer as Citizen
  70 FORDHAM L. REV. 1699 (2002) · Fordham Law Review · 2002
• A Further Comment on Robert P. George's "Natural Law"
  70 FORDHAM L. REV. 255 (2001) · Fordham Law Review · 2001
• The Natural Rights-Based Justification for Judicial Review
  69 FORDHAM L. REV. 2119 (2001) · Fordham Law Review · 2001
• Fidelity to Natural Law and Natural Rights in Constitutional Interpretation
  69 FORDHAM L. REV. 2285 (2001) · Fordham Law Review · 2001
• Foreword: Legal and Constitutional Implications of the Calls to Revive Civil Society
  75 CHI.-KENT. L. REV. 289 (2000) · Chicago-Kent Law Review · 2000
• Some Questions for Civil Society-Revivalists
  75 CHI.-KENT. L. REV. 301 (2000) · Chicago-Kent Law Review · 2000
• The Canon and the Constitution Outside the Courts
  17 CONST. COMMENT. 267 (2000) · Constitutional Commentary · 2000
• The Parsimony of Libertarianism
  17 CONST. COMMENT. 171 (2000) · Constitutional Commentary · 2000

• Fidelity, Basic Liberties, and the Specter of Lochner
  41 WM. & MARY L. REV. 147 (1999) · William & Mary Law Review · 1999
• We the Unconventional American People (reviewing <i>We the People: Transformations</i> by Bruce Ackerman)
  65 U. CHI. L. REV. (1998) · University of Chicago Law Review · 1998
• Fidelity to Our Imperfect Constitution
  65 FORDHAM L. REV. 1335 (1997) · Fordham Law Review · 1997
• We the Exceptional American People
  11 CONST. COMMENT. 355 (1994) · Constitutional Commentary · 1994

• A Critique of John Hart Ely's Quest for the Ultimate Constitutional Interpretivism of Representative Democracy
  80 MICH. L. REV. 634 (1982) · Michigan Law Review · 1982