Harold J. Krent

Publications

• Teaching Law Amidst Convulsive Doctrinal Change
  99 CHI.-KENT. L. REV. 453 (2024) · Chicago-Kent Law Review · 2024
• The Collateral Fallout from The Quest for a Unitary Executive
  92 FORDHAM L. REV. 423 (2023) · Fordham Law Review · 2023
• Situating Structural Challenges to Agency Authority Within the Framework of the Finality Principle
  98 IND. L.J. (2023) · Indiana Law Journal · 2023
• Introduction
  97 CHI.-KENT. L. REV. 3 (2022) · Chicago-Kent Law Review · 2022
• Can President Trump Be Impeached as Mr. Trump? Exploring the Temporal Dimension of Impeachments
  95 CHI.-KENT. L. REV. 537 (2021) · Chicago-Kent Law Review · 2021
• Distinguising Between Core and Peripheral Presential Powers
  94 CHI.-KENT. L. REV. 553 (2020) · Chicago-Kent Law Review · 2020

• AI Goes to School—Implications for School District Liability
  67 BUFF. L. REV. 1329 (2019) · Buffalo Law Review · 2019
• Introduction
  93 CHI.-KENT. L. REV. 973 (2018) · Chicago-Kent Law Review · 2018
• Post-Trial Plea Bargaining and Predictive Analytics in Public Law
  73 WASH. & LEE L. REV. ONLINE 595 (2017) · Washington and Lee Law Review Online · 2017
• Creating Precedents Through Words and Deeds
  32 CONST. COMMENT. 513 (2017) · Constitutional Commentary · 2017
• Inconsistency and Angst in District Court Resolution of Social Security Disability Appeals
  67 UC L.J. 367 (2016) · UC Law Journal · 2016
• Presidential Control of Adjudication Within the Executive Branch
  65 CASE W. RES. L. REV. 1083 (2015) · Case Western Reserve Law Review · 2015
• Retroactivity and Crack Sentencing Reform
  47 U. MICH. J. L. REFORM 53 (2013) · University of Michigan Journal of Law Reform · 2013
• Federal Power, Non-Federal Actors: The Ramifications of Free Enterprise Fund
  79 FORDHAM L. REV. 2425 (2011) · Fordham Law Review · 2011
• The Private Performing The Public: Delimiting Delegations To Private Parties
  65 U. MIAMI L. REV. 507 (2011) · University of Miami Law Review · 2011

• The Sometimes Unitary Executive: Presidential Practice Throughout History
  25 CONST. COMMENT. 489 (2009) · Constitutional Commentary · 2009
• Whose Business Is Your Pancreas? Potential Privacy Problems in New York City's Mandatory Diabetes Registry
  17 ANNALS HEALTH L. & LIFE SCIS. 1 (2008) · Annals of Health Law and Life Sciences · 2008
• Fee Shifting as a Congressional Response to Adventurous Presidential Signing Statements
  16 WM. & MARY BILL RTS. J. 211 (2007) · William & Mary Bill of Rights Journal · 2007
• The Lamentable Notion of Indefeasible Presidential Powers: A Reply to Professor Prakash
  91 CORNELL L. REV. 1383 (2006) · Cornell Law Review · 2006
• The Continuity Principle, Administrative Constraint, and the Fourth Amendment
  81 NOTRE DAME L. REV. 53 (2005) · Notre Dame Law Review · 2005
• Accommodating ALJ Decision Making Independence with Institutional Interests of the Administrative Judiciary
  25 J. NAT'L ASS'N ADMIN. L. JUD. (2005) · Journal of the National Association of Administrative Law Judiciary · 2005
• Laidlaw: Redressing the Law of Redressability
  12 DUKE ENVTL. L. & POL'Y F. 85 (2001) · Duke Environmental Law & Policy Forum · 2001
• Judging Judging: The Problem of Second-Guessing State Judges' Interpretation of State Law in Bush v. Gore
  29 FLA. ST. U. L. REV. (2001) · Florida State University Law Review · 2001
• Conditioning the President's Conditional Pardon Power
  89 CAL. L. REV. 1665 (2001) · California Law Review · 2001

• How to Move Beyond the Exclusionary Rule: Structuring Judicial Response to Legislative Reform Efforts
  26 PEPP. L. REV. (1999) · Pepperdine Law Review · 1999
• Monitoring Governmental Disposition of Assets: Fashioning Regulatory Substitutes for Market Controls
  52 VAND. L. REV. 1703 (1999) · Vanderbilt Law Review · 1999
• Foreword: The Legacy of Chancellor Kent
  74 CHI.-KENT. L. REV. 3 (1998) · Chicago-Kent Law Review · 1998
• The Supreme Court as an Enforcement Agency
  55 WASH. & LEE L. REV. 1149 (1998) · Washington and Lee Law Review · 1998
• Should Bouie Be Buoyed?: Judicial Retroactive Lawmaking and the Ex Post Facto Clause
  3 ROGER WILLLIAMS U. L. REV. (1997) · Roger Williams University Law Review · 1997
• Reviewing Agency Action for Inconsistency with Prior Rules and Regulations
  72 CHI.-KENT. L. REV. 1187 (1997) · Chicago-Kent Law Review · 1997
• Symposium on Administrative Law: Foreword
  72 CHI.-KENT. L. REV. 951 (1997) · Chicago-Kent Law Review · 1997
• Turning Congress into an Agency: The Propriety of Requiring Legislative Findings
  46 CASE W. RES. L. REV. 731 (1996) · Case Western Reserve Law Review · 1996
• The Fee-Shifting Remedy: Panacea or Placebo
  71 CHI.-KENT. L. REV. 415 (1995) · Chicago-Kent Law Review · 1995
• The Failed Promise of Regulatory Variables
  73 WASH. U. L. REV. 1117 (1995) · Washington University Law Review · 1995
• Of Citizen Suits and Citizen Sunstein
  91 MICH. L. REV. 1793 (1993) · Michigan Law Review · 1993
• Explaining One-Way Fee Shifting
  79 VA. L. REV. 2039 (1993) · Virginia Law Review · 1993
• Fee Shifting Under the Equal Access to Justice Act- A Qualified Success
  11 YALE L. & POL'Y REV. 458 (1993) · Yale Law & Policy Review · 1993
• Reconceptualizing Sovereign Immunity
  45 VAND. L. REV. 1529 (1992) · Vanderbilt Law Review · 1992

• Separating the Strands in Separation of Powers Controversies
  74 VA. L. REV. 1253 (1988) · Virginia Law Review · 1988