Graeme B. Dinwoodie

Publications

• Reading Trademark Tea-Leaves at the Supreme Court
  23 CHI.-KENT J. INTELL. PROP. 99 (2023) · Chicago-Kent Journal of Intellectual Property · 2023

• Brexit and IP: The Great Unraveling?
  39 CARDOZO L. REV. 967 (2018) · Cardozo Law Review · 2018
• Territorial Overlaps in Trademark Law: The Evolving European Model
  92 NOTRE DAME L. REV. 1669 (2017) · Notre Dame Law Review · 2017
• Panel Discussion: Remembering Justice Scalia in IP Cases
  16 CHI.-KENT J. INTELL. PROP. 203 (2016) · Chicago-Kent Journal of Intellectual Property · 2016

• Developing a Private International Intellectual Property Law: The Demise of Territoriality?
  51 WM. & MARY L. REV. 711 (2009) · William & Mary Law Review · 2009
• Diversifying without Discriminating: Complying with the Mandates of the TRIPS Agreement
  13 MICH. TELECOMM. & TECH. L. REV. 445 (2007) · Michigan Telecommunications & Technology Law Review · 2007
• The WIPO Copyright Treaty: A Transition to the Future of International Copyright Lawmaking
  57 CASE W. RES. L. REV. 751 (2007) · Case Western Reserve Law Review · 2007
• A Reverse Notice and Takedown Regime to Enable Pubic Interest Uses of Technically Protected Copyrighted Works
  22 BERKELEY TECH. L.J. 981 (2007) · Berkeley Technology Law Journal · 2007
• The International Intellectual Property Law System: New Actors, New Institutions, New Sources
  10 MARQ. INTELL. PROP. L. REV. 205 (2006) · Marquette Intellectual Property Law Review · 2006
• Dilution's (Still) Uncertain Future
  105 MICH. L. REV. FIRST IMPRESSIONS 98 (2006) · Michigan Law Review First Impressions · 2006
• Some Remarks on the Limits of Harmonization, 5 J. Marshall Rev. Intell. Prop. L. 596 (2006)
  5 J. MARSHALL. REV. INTELL. PROP. L. (2006) · UIC Review of Intellectual Property Law · 2006
• Symposium Remarks
  30 BROOK. J. INT'L L. (2005) · Brooklyn Journal of International Law · 2005
• TRIPS and the Dynamics of Intellectual Property Lawmaking
  36 CASE W. RES. J. INT'L L. 95 (2004) · Case Western Reserve Journal of International Law · 2004
• The Trademark Jurisprudence Of The Rehnquist Court
  8 MARQ. INTELL. PROP. L. REV. 187 (2004) · Marquette Intellectual Property Law Review · 2004
• The Architecture of the International Intellectual Property System
  77 CHI.-KENT. L. REV. 993 (2002) · Chicago-Kent Law Review · 2002
• Constructing International Intellectual Property Law: The Role of National Courts
  77 CHI.-KENT. L. REV. 991 (2002) · Chicago-Kent Law Review · 2002
• Designing Non-National Systems: The Case of the Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy
  43 WM. & MARY L. REV. 141 (2001) · William & Mary Law Review · 2001
• A New Copyright Order: Why National Courts Should Create Global Norms
  149 U. PENN. L. REV. 469 (2000) · University of Pennsylvania Law Review · 2000

• Reconceptualizing the Inherent Distinctiveness of Product Design Trade Dress
  75 N. C. L. REV. 471 (1997) · North Carolina Law Review · 1997
• Recent United States Copyright Reforms: Congress Catches the Spirit of Berne
  2 FORDHAM INTELL. PROP. MEDIA & ENT. L.J. 7 (1991) · Fordham Intellectual Property, Media and Entertainment Law Journal · 1991