Frederick K. Beutel

Publications

• Review of “Justice Joseph Story and the Rise of the Supreme Court,” By Gerald T. Dunne
  1972 WASH. U. L. REV. 827 (1972) · Washington University Law Review · 1972
• The Relationship of Experimental Jurisprudence to Other Schools of Jurisprudence and to Scientific Method
  1971 WASH. U. L. REV. 385 (1971) · Washington University Law Review · 1971

• Failure of Religious, Moral and Legal Controls to Meet the Needs of Modern Life: Legal Education
  18 CLEV. ST. L. REV. 223 (1969) · Cleveland State Law Review · 1969
• Interpretation, Construction and Revision of the Commercial Code: The Presumption of Holding in Due Course
  1966 WASH. U. L. REV. 381 (1966) · Washington University Law Review · 1966

• Review Article
  72 HARV. L. REV. 207 (1958) · Harvard Law Review · 1958
• Review Article
  57 COLUM. L. REV. 1047 (1957) · Columbia Law Review · 1957
• Review Article
  45 CAL. L. REV. 226 (1957) · California Law Review · 1957
• Law Making by Professional and Trade Associations
  34 NEB. L. REV. 431 (1955) · Nebraska Law Review · 1955
• The Lag between Scientific Discoveries and Legal Procedures
  33 NEB. L. REV. 1 (1953) · Nebraska Law Review · 1953
• The Proposed Uniform [?] Commercial Code Should Not Be Adopted
  61 YALE L.J. 334 (1952) · Yale Law Journal · 1952
• Review Article
  64 HARV. L. REV. 688 (1951) · Harvard Law Review · 1951
• An Outline of the Nature and Methods of Experimental Jurisprudence
  51 COLUM. L. REV. 415 (1951) · Columbia Law Review · 1951
• The Proposed Uniform Commercial Code As a Problem in Codification
  16 LAW & CONTEMP. PROBS. 141 (1951) · Law and Contemporary Problems · 1951

• Review Article
  57 HARV. L. REV. 742 (1944) · Harvard Law Review · 1944
• The Development of State Statutes on Negotiable Paper prior to the Negotiable Instruments Law
  40 COLUM. L. REV. 836 (1940) · Columbia Law Review · 1940
• Review Article
  50 YALE L.J. 191 (1940) · Yale Law Journal · 1940

• Review Article
  53 HARV. L. REV. 167 (1939) · Harvard Law Review · 1939
• CASES ON ADMINISTRATIVE LAW, by Kenneth C. Sears. West Publishing Co., St. Paul, 1938. Pp. xvi, 800. $6.00.
  1 LA. L. REV. (1939) · Louisiana Law Review · 1939
• The Development of Negotiable Instruments in Early English Law
  51 HARV. L. REV. 813 (1938) · Harvard Law Review · 1938
• Review Article
  50 HARV. L. REV. 1327 (1937) · Harvard Law Review · 1937
• Review Article
  37 COLUM. L. REV. 1250 (1937) · Columbia Law Review · 1937
• The Interpretation of the N. I. L. and Statutes Declaring Instruments Void
  83 U. PENN. L. REV. 744 (1935) · University of Pennsylvania Law Review · 1935
• Some Implications of Experimental Jurisprudence
  48 HARV. L. REV. 169 (1934) · Harvard Law Review · 1934
• The Negotiable Instruments Act Should Not Be Amended
  80 U. PENN. L. REV. 368 (1932) · University of Pennsylvania Law Review · 1932
• Review Article
  43 HARV. L. REV. 517 (1930) · Harvard Law Review · 1930
• Valuation as a Requirement of Due Process of Law in Rate Cases
  43 HARV. L. REV. 1249 (1930) · Harvard Law Review · 1930

• Due Process in Valuation of Local Utilities
  13 MINN. L. REV. 409 (1929) · Minnesota Law Review · 1929
• Review Article
  17 CAL. L. REV. 315 (1929) · California Law Review · 1929
• Rights of Remitters and Other Owners Not within the Tenor of Negotiable Instruments
  12 MINN. L. REV. 584 (1928) · Minnesota Law Review · 1928