Federico Cheever

Publications

• Climate Change Challenges for Land Conservation: Rethinking Conservation Easements, Strategies, and Tools
  95 DENV. L. REV. 727 (2018) · Denver Law Review · 2018
• The Phantom Menace and the Real Cause; Lessons from Colorado's Hayman Fire 2002
  18 PENN ST. ENVTL. L. REV. 185 (2010) · Penn State Environmental Law Review (1991 - 2011) · 2010

• Everyone Complains about the Weather, but No One Ever Does Anything about It: Interjurisdictional Failure to Designate Responsible Parties for the Climate Crisis
  85 DENV. L. REV. 765 (2008) · Denver Law Review · 2008
• Confronting Our Shared Legacy of Incongruous Land Ownership: Notes for a Research Agenda
  83 DENV. L. REV. 1039 (2006) · Denver Law Review · 2006

• Lawrence J. McDonnell, Requiem for Reclamation: From Reclamation to Sustainability
  2 WATER L. REV. 295 (1999) · Water Law Review · 1999
• Talking about Wilderness
  76 DENV. L. REV. 335 (1998) · Denver Law Review · 1998
• Sam Bingham, The Last Ranch
  2 WATER L. REV. 106 (1998) · Water Law Review · 1998
• Butterflies, Cave Spiders, Milk-Vetch, Bunchgrass, Sedges, Lilies, Checker-Mallows and Why the Prohibition Against Judicial Balancing of Harm Under the Endangered Species Act is a Good Idea
  22 WM. & MARY ENVTL. L. & POL'Y REV. 313 (1998) · William & Mary Environmental Law and Policy Review · 1998
• The United States Forest Service and National Park Service: Paradoxical Mandates, Powerful Founders, and the Rise and Fall of Agency Discretion
  74 DENV. L. REV. 625 (1997) · Denver Law Review · 1997
• Public Good and Private Magic in the Law of Land Trusts and Conservation Easements: A Happy Present and a Troubled Future
  73 DENV. L. REV. 1077 (1996) · Denver Law Review · 1996
• The Road to Recovery: A New Way of Thinking about the Endangered Species Act
  23 ECOLOGY L. Q. 1 (1996) · Ecology Law Quarterly · 1996
• An Introduction to the Prohibition Against Takings in Section 9 of the Endangered Species Act of 1973: Learning to Live With a Powerful Species Preservation LAw
  62 U. COLO. L. REV. 109 (1991) · University of Colorado Law Review · 1991