Erwin Chemerinsky

Publications

• Constitutional Failure
  123 MICH. L. REV. 1229 (2025) · Michigan Law Review · 2025
• What Is the Measure of Success for a Constitutional Law Casebook?
  34 WM. & MARY BILL RTS. J. 351 (2025) · William & Mary Bill of Rights Journal · 2025
• The Underlying Issues Concerning Free Speech in Schools
  76 STAN. L. REV. 1427 (2024) · Stanford Law Review · 2024
• Transcript – Civil Liberties: The Next 100 Years
  32 J. L. & POL'Y (2023) · Journal of Law and Policy · 2023
• Dean Erwin Chemerinsky Opening Remarks, Doctrine and Diversity Symposium, AALS Annual Meeting
  29 ROGER WILLLIAMS U. L. REV. (2023) · Roger Williams University Law Review · 2023
• Comment on Free Speech in Law Schools
  51 HOFSTRA L. REV. (2023) · Hofstra Law Review · 2023
• The Future of Substantive Due Process: What Are the Stakes?
  76 SMU L. REV. 427 (2023) · SMU Law Review · 2023
• Education, the First Amendment, and the Constitution
  92 U. CIN. L. REV. 12 (2023) · University of Cincinnati Law Review · 2023
• Misguided Federalism: State Regulation of the Internet and Social Media
  102 N. C. L. REV. 1 (2023) · North Carolina Law Review · 2023
• American University Law Review Keynote Address
  72 AM. U. L. REV. (2023) · American University Law Review · 2023
• Fixing America's Broken Democracy
  26 LEWIS & CLARK L. REV. v (2022) · Lewis & Clark Law Review · 2022
• The Supreme Court and Racial Progress
  100 N. C. L. REV. 833 (2022) · North Carolina Law Review · 2022
• TRANSCRIPT: The Roberts Court and Free Speech Symposium
  87 BROOK. L. REV. 289 (2021) · Brooklyn Law Review · 2021
• No, It Is Not a Christian Nation, and It Never Has Been and Should Not Be One
  26 ROGER WILLLIAMS U. L. REV. (2021) · Roger Williams University Law Review · 2021
• Keynote Address: Alaskan Election Law in 2020
  37 ALASKA L. REV. 139 (2020) · Alaska Law Review · 2020
• The Court Should Not Let Politically Divided Times Affects Its Choices and Decisions
  61 WM. & MARY L. REV. 971 (2020) · William & Mary Law Review · 2020

• Justice Kennedy: A Free Speech Justice? Only Sometimes
  70 UC L.J. 1193 (2019) · UC Law Journal · 2019
• The Supreme Court and Public Schools
  117 MICH. L. REV. 1107 (2019) · Michigan Law Review · 2019
• Eviscerating a Healthy Church-State Separation
  96 WASH. U. L. REV. 1009 (2019) · Washington University Law Review · 2019
• The Transgender Military Ban: Preservation of Discrimination Through Transformation
  114 NW. U. L. REV. 751 (2019) · Northwestern University Law Review · 2019
• Foreword: In Honor and Memory of David Caron
  37 BERKELEY J. INT'L L. 157 (2019) · Berkeley Journal of International Law · 2019
• State Constitutions as the Future for Civil Rights
  48 N. M. L. REV. 259 (2018) · New Mexico Law Review · 2018
• Keynote Address: The Alaska Constitution and the Future of Individual Rights
  35 ALASKA L. REV. 117 (2018) · Alaska Law Review · 2018
• Reflections of the Future of Legal Education
  13 FIU L. REV. 215 (2018) · FIU Law Review · 2018
• False Speech and the First Amendment
  71 OKLA. L. REV. 1 (2018) · Oklahoma Law Review · 2018
• Tobriner Memorial Lecture: Free Speech on Campus
  69 UC L.J. 1339 (2018) · UC Law Journal · 2018
• Transcript of Keynote Speech
  54 IDAHO L. REV. 287 (2018) · Idaho Law Review · 2018
• Trump, The Court, and Constitutional Law
  93 IND. L.J. (2018) · Indiana Law Journal · 2018
• What Can Brown Do for You?: Addressing McCleskey v. Kemp as a Flawed Standard for Measuring the Constitutionally Significant Risk of Race Bias
  112 NW. U. L. REV. 1293 (2018) · Northwestern University Law Review · 2018
• Pregnancy, Poverty and the State
  127 YALE L.J. (2018) · Yale Law Journal · 2018
• Pregnancy, Poverty, and the State The Poverty of Privacy Rights
  127 YALE L.J. 1270 (2018) · Yale Law Journal · 2018
• The First Amendment in the Era of President Trump
  94 DENV. L. REV. 553 (2017) · Denver Law Review · 2017
• Keynote Address
  51 GA. L. REV. (2017) · Georgia Law Review · 2017
• In Defense of Judicial Supremacy
  58 WM. & MARY L. REV. 1459 (2017) · William & Mary Law Review · 2017
• Leadership in Law Schools
  69 STAN. L. REV. 1765 (2017) · Stanford Law Review · 2017
• Creating a Law School That Emphasizes Public Interest Law
  7 DEPAUL J. FOR SOC. JUST. 1 (2016) · DePaul Journal for Social Justice · 2016
• Compulsory Vaccination Laws Are Constitutional
  110 NW. U. L. REV. 589 (2016) · Northwestern University Law Review · 2016
• The 2016 Election, the Supreme Court, and Racial Justice
  83 U. CHI. L. REV. ONLINE (2016) · University of Chicago Law Review Online · 2016
• 50th Annual William H. Leary Lecture - Fifty Years of Constitutional Law: What's Changed?
  2016 UTAH L. REV. (2016) · Utah Law Review · 2016
• Thinking About the Supreme Court's Successes and Failures
  69 VAND. L. REV. 919 (2016) · Vanderbilt Law Review · 2016
• Panel I: Freedom of Speech: Theories and Foundations
  Emory Law Journal · 2015
• A Fixture on a Changing Court: Justice Stevens and the Establishment Clause
  106 NW. U. L. REV. 587 (2015) · Northwestern University Law Review · 2015
• Federalism from the Neighborhood Up: Los Angeles's Neighborhood Councils, Minority Representation, and Democratic Legitimacy
  32 YALE L. & POL'Y REV. 569 (2015) · Yale Law & Policy Review · 2015
• Political Speech and Association Rights after Knox v. Seiu, Local 1000
  98 CORNELL L. REV. 1023 (2013) · Cornell Law Review · 2013
• Qualified Immunity Developments: Not Much Hope Left for Plaintiffs
  29 TOURO L. REV. (2013) · Touro Law Review · 2013
• The Inescapability of Constitutional Theory (reviewing <i>Cosmic Constitutional Theory: Why Americans Are Losing Their Inalienable Right to Self-Governance</i> by J. Harvie Wilkinson III.)
  80 U. CHI. L. REV. (2013) · University of Chicago Law Review · 2013
• The <em>Hazelwood</em>ing of the First Amendment: The Deference to Authority
  11 FIRST AMEND. L. REV. 291 (2013) · First Amendment Law Review · 2013
• Lessons from Gideon
  122 YALE L.J. 2676 (2013) · Yale Law Journal · 2013
• A Failure to Communicate
  2012 BYU L. REV. 1705 (2012) · BYU Law Review · 2012
• Closing the Courthouse Doors
  90 DENV. L. REV. 317 (2012) · Denver Law Review · 2012
• Political Ideology and Constitutional Decisionmaking: The Coming Example of the Affordable Care Act
  75 LAW & CONTEMP. PROBS. 1 (2012) · Law and Contemporary Problems · 2012
• Fourth Amendment Stops, Arrests and Searches in the Context of Qualified Immunity
  25 TOURO L. REV. (2012) · Touro Law Review · 2012
• The Elusive Quest for Value Neutral Judging: A Response to Redish and Arnould
  64 FLA. L. REV. 1539 (2012) · Florida Law Review · 2012
• Symposium on State Court Funding: Keynote Address
  100 KY. L.J. (2012) · Kentucky Law Journal · 2012
• The Failing Faith in Class Actions: Wal-Mart v. Dukes and AT&T Mobility v. Concepcion
  7 DUKE J. CONST. L. & PUB. POL'Y 73 (2011) · Duke Journal of Constitutional Law & Public Policy · 2011
• Supreme Court—October Term 2009 Foreword: Conservative Judicial Activism
  44 LOY. L. A. L. REV. 863 (2011) · Loyola of Los Angeles Law Review · 2011
• A Defense of the Constitutionality of the Individual Mandate
  62 MERCER L. REV. (2011) · Mercer Law Review · 2011
• Korematsu v. United States: A Tragedy Hopefully Never to Be Repeated
  39 PEPP. L. REV. (2011) · Pepperdine Law Review · 2011
• Three Vital Issues: Incorporation of the Second Amendment, Federal Government Power, and Separation of Powers - October 2009 Term
  27 TOURO L. REV. (2011) · Touro Law Review · 2011
• The Supreme Court 2009 Term Overview and 2010 Term Preview
  27 TOURO L. REV. (2011) · Touro Law Review · 2011
• The Roberts Court and Freedom of Speech
  63 FED. COMM. L.J. (2011) · Federal Communications Law Journal · 2011
• Formalism without a Foundation: Stern v Marshall
  2011 SUP. CT. REV. (2011) · Supreme Court Review · 2011
• Symposium Transcript
  9 RICH. J. GLOBAL L. & BUS. 307 (2010) · Richmond Journal of Global Law & Business · 2010
• Closing the Courthouse Doors: Transcript of the 2010 Honorable James R. Browning Distinguished Lecture in Law
  71 MONT. L. REV. 285 (2010) · Montana Law Review · 2010
• Two Cheers for State Constitutional Law
  62 STAN. L. REV. (2010) · Stanford Law Review · 2010
• A Progressive Visionary: Stephen Reinhardt and the First Amendment
  120 YALE L.J. 515 (2010) · Yale Law Journal · 2010
• A Progressive Visionary: Stephen Reinhardt and the First Amendment
  120 YALE L.J. 514 (2010) · Yale Law Journal · 2010

• The Disparate Treatment of Race and Class in Constitutional Jurisprudence
  72 LAW & CONTEMP. PROBS. 109 (2009) · Law and Contemporary Problems · 2009
• No Warrant for Radical Change: A Response to Professors George and Guthrie
  58 DUKE L.J. 1691 (2009) · Duke Law Journal · 2009
• Civil Liberties and the War Terror: Seven Years after 9/11 History Repeating: Due Process, Torture and Privacy during the War on Terror
  62 SMU L. REV. 3 (2009) · SMU Law Review · 2009
• The Second Amendment and Gun Control
  25 TOURO L. REV. (2009) · Touro Law Review · 2009
• An Overview of the October 2007 Supreme Court Term
  25 TOURO L. REV. (2009) · Touro Law Review · 2009
• The Constitution and National Security
  25 TOURO L. REV. (2009) · Touro Law Review · 2009
• Losing Faith: The Supreme Court and the Abandonment of the Adjudicatory Process
  60 UC L.J. 1129 (2009) · UC Law Journal · 2009
• The Meaning of <i>Bush v. Gore</i>: Thoughts on Professor Amar's Analysis
  61 FLA. L. REV. 969 (2009) · Florida Law Review · 2009
• Why Write?
  107 MICH. L. REV. 881 (2009) · Michigan Law Review · 2009
• Unpleasant Speech on Campus, Even Hate Speech, Is a First Amendment Issue
  17 WM. & MARY BILL RTS. J. 765 (2009) · William & Mary Bill of Rights Journal · 2009
• Tucker Lecture, Law and Media Symposium
  66 WASH. & LEE L. REV. 1449 (2009) · Washington and Lee Law Review · 2009
• Judicial Opinions as Public Rhetoric
  97 CAL. L. REV. 1763 (2009) · California Law Review · 2009
• Foreword: Why Write?
  107 MICH. L. REV. 881 (2009) · Michigan Law Review · 2009
• Ethics: New Challenges for Attorneys Under the New Code
  4 DEPAUL BUS. & COM. L.J. 567 (2008) · DePaul Business & Commercial Law Journal · 2008
• A Terrific Scholar and a Wonderful Human Being
  35 FLA. ST. U. L. REV. (2008) · Florida State University Law Review · 2008
• Absolute Immunity: General Principles and Recent Developments
  24 TOURO L. REV. (2008) · Touro Law Review · 2008
• <em>Washington v. Glucksberg</em> Was Tragically Wrong
  106 MICH. L. REV. 1501 (2008) · Michigan Law Review · 2008
• Symposium Foreword
  43 TULSA L. REV. 627 (2008) · Tulsa Law Review · 2008
• Why Church and State Should Be Separate
  49 WM. & MARY L. REV. 2193 (2008) · William & Mary Law Review · 2008
• The Essential but Inherently Limited Role of the Courts in Prison Reform
  13 BERKELEY J. CRIM. L. 307 (2008) · Berkeley Journal of Criminal Law · 2008
• Was He Guilty as Charged? An Alternative Narrative Based on the Circumstantial Evidence from <em>12 Angry Men</em>
  82 CHI.-KENT. L. REV. 691 (2007) · Chicago-Kent Law Review · 2007
• Thoughts on Commercial Speech: A Roundtable Discussion (February 23, 2007)
  41 LOY. L. A. L. REV. 333 (2007) · Loyola of Los Angeles Law Review · 2007
• Civil Rights
  34 PEPP. L. REV. (2007) · Pepperdine Law Review · 2007
• An Overview of the October 2006 Supreme Court Term
  23 TOURO L. REV. (2007) · Touro Law Review · 2007
• The State-Created Danger Doctrine
  23 TOURO L. REV. (2007) · Touro Law Review · 2007
• First Amendment Decisions from the October 2006 Term
  23 TOURO L. REV. (2007) · Touro Law Review · 2007
• The Constitution and Fundamental Rights
  18 U. FLA. J. L. & PUB. POL'Y (2007) · University of Florida Journal of Law & Public Policy · 2007
• In Defense of Roe and Professor Tribe
  42 TULSA L. REV. 833 (2007) · Tulsa Law Review · 2007
• Why the Supreme Court was Wrong About the Solomon Amendment
  1 DUKE J. CONST. L. & PUB. POL'Y 259 (2006) · Duke Journal of Constitutional Law & Public Policy · 2006
• Reconceptualizing Federalism
  50 N.Y.L. SCH. L. REV. (2006) · NYLS Law Review · 2006
• Presidential Powers Including Military Tribunals in the October 2005 Term
  22 TOURO L. REV. (2006) · Touro Law Review · 2006
• An Overview of the October 2005 Supreme Court Term
  22 TOURO L. REV. (2006) · Touro Law Review · 2006
• An Unprecedented Threat to Civil Liberties: An Essay in Honor of Nadine Strossen
  41 TULSA L. REV. 625 (2006) · Tulsa Law Review · 2006
• The Assumptions of Federalism
  58 STAN. L. REV. (2006) · Stanford Law Review · 2006
• In Defense of Filibustering Judicial Nominations
  26 CARDOZO L. REV. 331 (2005) · Cardozo Law Review · 2005
• Empowering States: A Rebuttal to Dr. Greve
  33 PEPP. L. REV. (2005) · Pepperdine Law Review · 2005
• Empowering States: The Need to Limit Federal Preemption
  33 PEPP. L. REV. (2005) · Pepperdine Law Review · 2005
• Qualified Immunity: 1983 Litigation in the Public Employment Context
  21 TOURO L. REV. (2005) · Touro Law Review · 2005
• Look Back at the Rehnquist Era and an Overview of the 2004 Supreme Court Term
  21 TOURO L. REV. (2005) · Touro Law Review · 2005
• Federalism Cases in the October 2004 Term
  21 TOURO L. REV. (2005) · Touro Law Review · 2005
• Human Rights and Liberties: 50 Years after Brown v. Board of Education - Keynote Speakers
  3 UC L.J. RACE & ECON. JUST. 95 (2005) · UC Law Journal of Race and Economic Justice · 2005
• 2003-2004 Supreme Court Update
  2005 UTAH L. REV. (2005) · Utah Law Review · 2005
• Why Justice Breyer Was Wrong in Van Orden v. Perry
  14 WM. & MARY BILL RTS. J. 1 (2005) · William & Mary Bill of Rights Journal · 2005
• Empowering States When It Matters: A different Approach to Preemption
  69 BROOK. L. REV. 1313 (2004) · Brooklyn Law Review · 2004
• What Is Commercial Speech - The Issue Not Decided in <i>Nike v. Kasky</i>
  54 CASE W. RES. L. REV. 1143 (2004) · Case Western Reserve Law Review · 2004
• Post 9/11 Civil Rights: Are Americans Sacrificing Freedom for Security
  81 DENV. L. REV. 759 (2004) · Denver Law Review · 2004
• Progressive and Conservative Constitutionalism as the United States Enters the 21st Century
  67 LAW & CONTEMP. PROBS. 53 (2004) · Law and Contemporary Problems · 2004
• Putting the Gun Control Debate in Social Perspective
  73 FORDHAM L. REV. 477 (2004) · Fordham Law Review · 2004
• A Pro Bono Requirement for Faculty Members
  37 LOY. L. A. L. REV. 1235 (2004) · Loyola of Los Angeles Law Review · 2004
• The Rehnquist Revolution
  2 U. N. H. L. REV. (2004) · The University of New Hampshire Law Review · 2004
• Section 1983 Civil Rights Litigation Colloquium
  20 TOURO L. REV. (2004) · Touro Law Review · 2004
• Discussion: Focus on Federalism
  20 TOURO L. REV. (2004) · Touro Law Review · 2004
• Detentions Without Due Process of Law Following September 11th
  20 TOURO L. REV. (2004) · Touro Law Review · 2004
• Real Discrimination?
  16 WASH. U. J. L. & POL'Y 97 (2004) · Washington University Journal of Law & Policy · 2004
• In Defense of Judicial Review: A Reply to Professor Kramer
  92 CAL. L. REV. 1013 (2004) · California Law Review · 2004
• Brief for Petitioners
  52 AM. U. L. REV. (2003) · American University Law Review · 2003
• Separate and Unequal: American Public Education Today
  52 AM. U. L. REV. (2003) · American University Law Review · 2003
• Privacy and the Alaska Constitution: Failing to Fulfill the Promise
  20 ALASKA L. REV. 29 (2003) · Alaska Law Review · 2003
• The Myth of the Liberal Ninth Circuit
  37 LOY. L. A. L. REV. (2003) · Loyola of Los Angeles Law Review · 2003
• Understanding the Rehnquist Court: An Admiring Reply to Professor Merrill
  47 ST. LOUIS U. L.J. (2003) · Saint Louis University Law Journal · 2003
• Government Duty to Protect: Post-DeShaney Developments
  19 TOURO L. REV. (2003) · Touro Law Review · 2003
• Section 1983 Litigation: Supreme Court Review
  19 TOURO L. REV. (2003) · Touro Law Review · 2003
• Keynote Address — Evolving Standards of Decency in 2003: Is the Death Penalty on Life Support?
  29 U. DAYTON L. REV. (2003) · University of Dayton Law Review · 2003
• The Segregation and Resegregation of American Public Education: The Court's Role
  81 N. C. L. REV. 1597 (2003) · North Carolina Law Review · 2003
• Entrenchment of Ordinary Legislation: A Reply to Professors Posner and Vermeule
  91 CAL. L. REV. 1773 (2003) · California Law Review · 2003
• Ensuring the Supremacy of Federal Law: Why the District Court Was Wrong in Westside Mothers v. Haveman
  12 HEALTH MATRIX 139 (2002) · Health Matrix: The Journal of Law-Medicine · 2002
• How Should We Think about <i>Bush v. Gore</i>
  34 LOY. U. CHI. L.J. 1 (2002) · Loyola University Chicago Law Journal · 2002
• Supreme Court 2000-2001 Term: First Amendment Cases
  18 TOURO L. REV. (2002) · Touro Law Review · 2002
• The Rhetoric of Constitutional Law
  100 MICH. L. REV. 2008 (2002) · Michigan Law Review · 2002
• A Grand Theory of Constitutional Law
  100 MICH. L. REV. 1249 (2002) · Michigan Law Review · 2002
• The Federalism Revolution
  31 N. M. L. REV. 7 (2001) · New Mexico Law Review · 2001
• Supreme Court Update
  31 N. M. L. REV. 31 (2001) · New Mexico Law Review · 2001
• Suits against the States: The Changing Law of Immunities
  31 N. M. L. REV. 149 (2001) · New Mexico Law Review · 2001
• An Independent Analysis of the Los Angeles Police Department's Board of Inquiry Report on the Rampart Scandal
  34 LOY. L. A. L. REV. 545 (2001) · Loyola of Los Angeles Law Review · 2001
• Why the Rehnquist Court Is Wrong about the Establishment Clause
  33 LOY. U. CHI. L.J. 221 (2001) · Loyola University Chicago Law Journal · 2001
• Bush v. Gore Was Not Justiciable
  76 NOTRE DAME L. REV. 1093 (2001) · Notre Dame Law Review · 2001
• Further Thoughts
  54 OKLA. L. REV. 59 (2001) · Oklahoma Law Review · 2001
• Getting Beyond Formalism in Constitutional Law: Constitutional Theory Matters
  54 OKLA. L. REV. 1 (2001) · Oklahoma Law Review · 2001
• Law Enforcement and Criminal Law Decisions
  28 PEPP. L. REV. (2001) · Pepperdine Law Review · 2001
• The Expressive Interest of Associations
  9 WM. & MARY BILL RTS. J. 595 (2001) · William & Mary Bill of Rights Journal · 2001
• The Hypocrisy of Alden v. Maine: Judicial Review, Sovereign Immunity and the Rehnquist Court
  33 LOY. L. A. L. REV. 1283 (2000) · Loyola of Los Angeles Law Review · 2000
• Protect the Press: A First Amendment Standard for Safeguarding Aggressive Newsgathering
  33 U. RICH. L. REV. 1143 (2000) · University of Richmond Law Review · 2000
• Procedural Due Process Claims
  16 TOURO L. REV. (2000) · Touro Law Review · 2000
• Dialogue on State Action
  16 TOURO L. REV. (2000) · Touro Law Review · 2000
• Losing Faith: America Without Judicial Review?
  98 MICH. L. REV. 1416 (2000) · Michigan Law Review · 2000
• The Court Should Have Remained Silent: Why the Court Erred in Deciding Dickerson v. United States
  149 U. PENN. L. REV. 287 (2000) · University of Pennsylvania Law Review · 2000

• The Ethics of Being a Commentator III
  50 MERCER L. REV. (1999) · Mercer Law Review · 1999
• Prosecutorial Immunity
  15 TOURO L. REV. (1999) · Touro Law Review · 1999
• Substantive Due Process
  15 TOURO L. REV. (1999) · Touro Law Review · 1999
• In Defense of the Big Tent: The Importance of Recognizing the Many Audiences for Legal Scholarship
  34 TULSA L. REV. 667 (1999) · Tulsa Law Review · 1999
• Civil Rights Without Remedies: Vicarious Liability Under Title VII, Section 1983, and Title IX
  7 WM. & MARY BILL RTS. J. 755 (1999) · William & Mary Bill of Rights Journal · 1999
• The Rehnquist Court & Justice: An Oxymoron?
  1 WASH. U. J. L. & POL'Y 37 (1999) · Washington University Journal of Law & Policy · 1999
• Opening Closed Chambers
  108 YALE L.J. 1087 (1999) · Yale Law Journal · 1999
• Preserving an Independent Judiciary: The Need for Contribution and Expenditure Limits in Judicial Elections
  74 CHI.-KENT. L. REV. 133 (1998) · Chicago-Kent Law Review · 1998
• The Religious Freedom Restoration Act Is a Constitutional Expansion of Rights
  39 WM. & MARY L. REV. 601 (1998) · William & Mary Law Review · 1998
• Lawyers have Free Speech Rights, Too: Why Gag Orders on Trial Participants Are almost Always Unconstitutional
  17 LOY. L. A. ENT. L. REV. 311 (1997) · Loyola of Los Angeles Entertainment Law Review · 1997
• Formalism and Functionalism in Federalism Analysis
  13 GA. ST. U. L. REV. (1997) · Georgia State University Law Review · 1997
• The Ethics of Being a Commentator II
  37 SANTA CLARA L. REV. 913 (1997) · Santa Clara Law Review · 1997
• The Impact of the Proposed California Civil Rights Initiative
  23 UC L. CONST. Q. 999 (1996) · UC Law Constitutional Quarterly · 1996
• Is it the Siren's Call: Judges and Free Speech while Cases are Pending
  28 LOY. L. A. L. REV. 831 (1995) · Loyola of Los Angeles Law Review · 1995
• The Fragmentation of Federal Rules
  46 MERCER L. REV. (1995) · Mercer Law Review · 1995
• Eliminating Discrimination in Administering the Death Penalty: The Need for the Racial Justice Act
  35 SANTA CLARA L. REV. 519 (1995) · Santa Clara Law Review · 1995
• Reporter's Draft for the Working Group on Principles to Use When Considering the Federalization of Civil Law
  46 UC L.J. 1305 (1995) · UC Law Journal · 1995
• The Values of Federalism
  47 FLA. L. REV. 499 (1995) · Florida Law Review · 1995
• The First Amendment: When the Government Must Make Content-Based Choices
  42 CLEV. ST. L. REV. 199 (1994) · Cleveland State Law Review · 1994
• Case Under the Guarantee Clause Should Be Justiciable
  65 U. COLO. L. REV. 849 (1994) · University of Colorado Law Review · 1994
• Rehabilitating Federalism
  92 MICH. L. REV. 1333 (1994) · Michigan Law Review · 1994
• Making the Case for a Constitutional Right to Minimum Entitlements
  44 MERCER L. REV. (1993) · Mercer Law Review · 1993
• History, Tradition, the Supreme Court, and the First Amendment
  44 UC L.J. 901 (1993) · UC Law Journal · 1993
• The Supreme Court and the Fourteenth Amendment: The Unfulfilled Promise
  25 LOY. L. A. L. REV. 1143 (1992) · Loyola of Los Angeles Law Review · 1992
• In Defense of Truth
  41 CASE W. RES. L. REV. 745 (1991) · Case Western Reserve Law Review · 1991
• Defining the Role of the Federal Courts
  1990 BYU L. REV. 67 (1990) · BYU Law Review · 1990
• Congress, the Supreme Court, and the Eleventh Amendment: A Comment on the Decisions during the 1988-89 Term
  39 DEPAUL L. REV. 321 (1990) · DePaul Law Review · 1990

• The Question's Not Clear, But Party Government Is Not the Answer
  30 WM. & MARY L. REV. 411 (1989) · William & Mary Law Review · 1989
• The Constitution Is Not "Hard Law": The Bork Rejection and the Future of Constitutional Jurisprudence
  6 CONST. COMMENT. 29 (1989) · Constitutional Commentary · 1989
• Thinking about Habeas Corpus
  37 CASE W. RES. L. REV. 748 (1987) · Case Western Reserve Law Review · 1987
• State Sovereignty and Federal Court Power: The Eleventh Amendment after Pennhurst v. Halderman
  12 UC L. CONST. Q. 643 (1985) · UC Law Constitutional Quarterly · 1985
• Changing the Rules of the Game: The New FCC Regulations on Political Debates
  7 HASTINGS COMM. & ENT. L.J. (1984) · UC Law SF Communications and Entertainment Journal · 1984
• Ending the Dual System of American Public Education: The Urgent Need for Legislative Action
  32 DEPAUL L. REV. 77 (1983) · DePaul Law Review · 1983
• Controlling Fraud against the Government: The Need for Decentralized Enforcement
  58 NOTRE DAME L. REV. 995 (1983) · Notre Dame Law Review · 1983
• In Defense of Equality: A Reply to Professor Westen
  81 MICH. L. REV. 575 (1983) · Michigan Law Review · 1983
• Rationalizing the Abortion Debate: Legal Rhetoric and the Abortion Controversy
  31 BUFF. L. REV. 107 (1982) · Buffalo Law Review · 1982
• Fraud and Corruption against the Government: A Proposed Statute to Establish a Taxpayer Remedy
  72 J. CRIM. L. & CRIMINOLOGY 1482 (1981) · Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology · 1981