Ernest A. Young

Publications

• What Belongs in a Constitutional Law Casebook?
  34 WM. & MARY BILL RTS. J. 485 (2025) · William & Mary Bill of Rights Journal · 2025
• Standing and Probabilistic Injury
  122 MICH. L. REV. 1557 (2024) · Michigan Law Review · 2024
• Standing, Equity, and Injury in Fact
  97 NOTRE DAME L. REV. 1885 (2022) · Notre Dame Law Review · 2022
• Chaos, Accomplishment, and Work, or, What I Learned on Paternity Leave
  27 DUKE J. GENDER L. & POL'Y 269 (2020) · Duke Journal of Gender Law & Policy · 2020

• <i>Erie</i> as a Way of Life
  52 AKRON L. REV. (2019) · Akron Law Review · 2019
• Dying Constitutionalism and the Fourteenth Amendment
  102 MARQ. L. REV. 949 (2019) · Marquette Law Review · 2019
• Dartmouth College v. Woodward and the Structure of Civil Society
  18 U. N. H. L. REV. (2019) · The University of New Hampshire Law Review · 2019
• State Standing and Cooperative Federalism
  94 NOTRE DAME L. REV. 1893 (2019) · Notre Dame Law Review · 2019
• Against Amendments
  13 DUKE J. CONST. L. & PUB. POL'Y 149 (2018) · Duke Journal of Constitutional Law & Public Policy · 2018
• Our Prescriptive Judicial Power: Constitutive and Entrenchment Effects of Historical Practice in Federal Courts Law
  58 WM. & MARY L. REV. 535 (2016) · William & Mary Law Review · 2016
• Modern-Day Nullification: Marijuana and the Persistence of Federalism in an Age of Overlapping Regulatory Jurisdiction
  65 CASE W. RES. L. REV. 769 (2015) · Case Western Reserve Law Review · 2015
• Universal Jurisdiction, the Alien Tort Statute, and Transnational Public-Law Litigation After Kiobel
  64 DUKE L.J. 1023 (2015) · Duke Law Journal · 2015
• Federalism as a Constitutional Principle
  83 U. CIN. L. REV. 1057 (2015) · University of Cincinnati Law Review · 2015
• Exit, Voice, and Loyalty as Federalism Strategies: Lessons from the Same-Sex Marriage Debate
  85 U. COLO. L. REV. 1133 (2014) · University of Colorado Law Review · 2014
• Is There a Federal Definitions Power?
  64 CASE W. RES. L. REV. 1269 (2014) · Case Western Reserve Law Review · 2014
• Prudential Standing after Lexmark International, Inc. v. Static Control Components, Inc.
  10 DUKE J. CONST. L. & PUB. POL'Y 149 (2014) · Duke Journal of Constitutional Law & Public Policy · 2014
• A Research Agenda for Uncooperative Federalists
  48 TULSA L. REV. 427 (2013) · Tulsa Law Review · 2013
• How Customary is Customary International Law?
  54 WM. & MARY L. REV. 885 (2013) · William & Mary Law Review · 2013
• Popular Constitutionalism and the Underenforcement Problem: The Case of The National Healthcare Law
  75 LAW & CONTEMP. PROBS. 157 (2012) · Law and Contemporary Problems · 2012
• The Constitutional Law of State Debt
  7 DUKE J. CONST. L. & PUB. POL'Y 117 (2012) · Duke Journal of Constitutional Law & Public Policy · 2012
• Judicial Takings and Collateral Attack on State Court Property Decisions
  6 DUKE J. CONST. L. & PUB. POL'Y 107 (2011) · Duke Journal of Constitutional Law & Public Policy · 2011
• “The Ordinary Diet of the Law”: The Presumption Against Preemption in the Roberts Court
  2011 SUP. CT. REV. (2011) · Supreme Court Review · 2011
• What Does It Take to Make a Federal System - On Constitutional Entrenchment, Separate Spheres, and Identity
  45 TULSA L. REV. 831 (2010) · Tulsa Law Review · 2010
• The Continuity of Statutory and Constitutional Interpretation: An Essay for Phil Frickey
  98 CAL. L. REV. 1371 (2010) · California Law Review · 2010

• Does the Supreme Court Follow the Economic Returns? A Response to A Macrotheory of the Court
  58 DUKE L.J. 1759 (2009) · Duke Law Journal · 2009
• Tennis with the Net Down: Administrative Federalism Without Congress
  57 DUKE L.J. 2111 (2008) · Duke Law Journal · 2008
• Supranational Rulings as Judgments and Precedents
  18 DUKE J. COMP. & INT'L L. 477 (2008) · Duke Journal of Comparative & International Law · 2008
• Preemption and Federal Common Law
  83 NOTRE DAME L. REV. 1639 (2008) · Notre Dame Law Review · 2008
• Stalking the Yeti: Protective Jurisdiction, Foreign Affairs Removal, and Complete Preemption
  95 CAL. L. REV. 1775 (2007) · California Law Review · 2007
• Institutional Settlement in a Globalizing Judicial System
  54 DUKE L.J. 1143 (2005) · Duke Law Journal · 2005
• Making Federalism Doctrine: Fidelity, Institutional Competence, and Compensating Adjustments
  46 WM. & MARY L. REV. 1733 (2005) · William & Mary Law Review · 2005
• Just Blowing Smoke? Politics, Doctrine, and the Federalist Revival after Gonzales v Raich
  2005 SUP. CT. REV. (2005) · Supreme Court Review · 2005
• Welcome to the Dark Side: Liberals Rediscover Federalism in the Wake of the War on Terror
  69 BROOK. L. REV. 1277 (2004) · Brooklyn Law Review · 2004
• It's Just Water: Toward the Normalization of Admiralty
  35 J. MAR. L. & COM. (2004) · Journal of Maritime Law and Commerce · 2004
• English Constitutionalism Circa 2005, or, Some Funny Things Happened After the Revolution
  21 CONST. COMMENT. 771 (2004) · Constitutional Commentary · 2004
• Judicial Activism and Conservative Politics
  73 U. COLO. L. REV. 1139 (2002) · University of Colorado Law Review · 2002
• Federalism and the Double Standard of Judicial Review
  51 DUKE L.J. 75 (2001) · Duke Law Journal · 2001
• Who's Afraid of the Twelfth Amendment?
  29 FLA. ST. U. L. REV. (2001) · Florida State University Law Review · 2001
• Two Cheers for Process Federalism
  46 VILL. L. REV. 1349 (2001) · Villanova Law Review (1956 - ) · 2001
• Alden v. Maine and the Jurisprudence of Structure
  41 WM. & MARY L. REV. 1601 (2000) · William & Mary Law Review · 2000

• The Last Brooding Omnipresence: Erie Railroad Co. v. Tompkins and the Unconstitutionality of Preemptive Federal Maritime Law
  43 ST. LOUIS U. L.J. (1999) · Saint Louis University Law Journal · 1999
• State Sovereign Immunity and the Future of Federalism
  1999 SUP. CT. REV. (1999) · Supreme Court Review · 1999
• Rediscovering Conservatism: Burkean Political Theory and Constitutional Interpretation
  72 N. C. L. REV. 619 (1994) · North Carolina Law Review · 1994