-
68 DUKE L.J. 1383 (2019) · Duke Law Journal · 2019
-
81 LAW & CONTEMP. PROBS. 1 (2018) · Law and Contemporary Problems · 2018
-
85 U. CHI. L. REV. (2018) · University of Chicago Law Review · 2018
-
47 J. LEGAL STUD. (2018) · Journal of Legal Studies · 2018
-
47 J. LEGAL STUD. (2018) · Journal of Legal Studies · 2018
-
106 CAL. L. REV. 1277 (2018) · California Law Review · 2018
-
101 MINN. L. REV. 1529 (2017) · Minnesota Law Review · 2017
-
102 CORNELL L. REV. 87 (2016) · Cornell Law Review · 2016
-
45 J. LEGAL STUD. (2016) · Journal of Legal Studies · 2016
-
126 YALE L.J. 504 (2016) · Yale Law Journal · 2016
-
91 NOTRE DAME L. REV. (2016) · Notre Dame Law Review · 2016
-
107 NW. U. L. REV. 1307 (2015) · Northwestern University Law Review · 2015
-
82 U. CHI. L. REV. (2015) · University of Chicago Law Review · 2015
-
44 J. LEGAL STUD. (2015) · Journal of Legal Studies · 2015
-
44 J. LEGAL STUD. (2015) · Journal of Legal Studies · 2015
-
68 VAND. L. REV. 441 (2015) · Vanderbilt Law Review · 2015
-
77 LAW & CONTEMP. PROBS. 289 (2014) · Law and Contemporary Problems · 2014
-
81 U. CHI. L. REV. (2014) · University of Chicago Law Review · 2014
-
43 J. LEGAL STUD. (2014) · Journal of Legal Studies · 2014
-
15 CHI. J. INT'L L. (2014) · Chicago Journal of International Law · 2014
-
80 U. CHI. L. REV. (2013) · University of Chicago Law Review · 2013
-
80 U. CHI. L. REV. (2013) · University of Chicago Law Review · 2013
-
13 CHI. J. INT'L L. (2013) · Chicago Journal of International Law · 2013
-
42 J. LEGAL STUD. (2013) · Journal of Legal Studies · 2013
-
80 U. CHI. L. REV. (2013) · University of Chicago Law Review · 2013
-
79 U. CHI. L. REV. (2012) · University of Chicago Law Review · 2012
-
122 YALE L.J. 2 (2012) · Yale Law Journal · 2012
-
11 CHI. J. INT'L L. (2011) · Chicago Journal of International Law · 2011
-
110 MICH. L. REV. 243 (2011) · Michigan Law Review · 2011
-
40 J. LEGAL STUD. (2011) · Journal of Legal Studies · 2011
-
99 CAL. L. REV. 1557 (2011) · California Law Review · 2011
-
77 U. CHI. L. REV. (2010) · University of Chicago Law Review · 2010
-
77 U. CHI. L. REV. 1181 (2010) · University of Chicago Law Review · 2010
-
58 DUKE L.J. 1313 (2009) · Duke Law Journal · 2009
-
76 U. CHI. L. REV. (2009) · University of Chicago Law Review · 2009
-
107 MICH. L. REV. 1431 (2009) · Michigan Law Review · 2009
-
97 CAL. L. REV. 51 (2009) · California Law Review · 2009
-
75 U. CHI. L. REV. (2008) · University of Chicago Law Review · 2008
-
37 J. LEGAL STUD. (2008) · Journal of Legal Studies · 2008
-
37 J. LEGAL STUD. (2008) · Journal of Legal Studies · 2008
-
70 LAW & CONTEMP. PROBS. 33 (2007) · Law and Contemporary Problems · 2007
-
74 U. CHI. L. REV. (2007) · University of Chicago Law Review · 2007
-
74 U. CHI. L. REV. (2007) · University of Chicago Law Review · 2007
-
8 CHI. J. INT'L L. (2007) · Chicago Journal of International Law · 2007
-
116 YALE L.J. 1170 (2007) · Yale Law Journal · 2007
-
33 FLA. ST. U. L. REV. (2006) · Florida State University Law Review · 2006
-
73 U. CHI. L. REV. (2006) · University of Chicago Law Review · 2006
-
7 CHI. J. INT'L L. (2006) · Chicago Journal of International Law · 2006
-
34 GA. J. INT'L & COMP. L. 463 (2006) · Georgia Journal of International & Comparative Law · 2006
-
104 MICH. L. REV. 671 (2006) · Michigan Law Review · 2006
-
23 CONST. COMMENT. 307 (2006) · Constitutional Commentary · 2006
-
55 DUKE L.J. 75 (2005) · Duke Law Journal · 2005
-
5 CHI. J. INT'L L. (2005) · Chicago Journal of International Law · 2005
-
72 U. CHI. L. REV. (2005) · University of Chicago Law Review · 2005
-
34 J. LEGAL STUD. (2005) · Journal of Legal Studies · 2005
-
93 CAL. L. REV. 1 (2005) · California Law Review · 2005
-
93 CAL. L. REV. 957 (2005) · California Law Review · 2005
-
12 TULSA J. COMP. & INT'L L. 23 (2004) · Tulsa Journal of Comparative and International Law · 2004
-
47 J. L. & ECON. (2004) · Journal of Law and Economics · 2004
-
53 DUKE L.J. 1067 (2003) · Duke Law Journal · 2003
-
70 U. CHI. L. REV. (2003) · University of Chicago Law Review · 2003
-
70 U. CHI. L. REV. (2003) · University of Chicago Law Review · 2003
-
70 U. CHI. L. REV. (2003) · University of Chicago Law Review · 2003
-
151 U. PENN. L. REV. 1097 (2003) · University of Pennsylvania Law Review · 2003
-
112 YALE L.J. 829 (2003) · Yale Law Journal · 2003
-
36 U. RICH. L. REV. 465 (2002) · University of Richmond Law Review · 2002
-
69 U. CHI. L. REV. (2002) · University of Chicago Law Review · 2002
-
31 J. LEGAL STUD. (2002) · Journal of Legal Studies · 2002
-
31 J. LEGAL STUD. (2002) · Journal of Legal Studies · 2002
-
150 U. PENN. L. REV. 1473 (2002) · University of Pennsylvania Law Review · 2002
-
111 YALE L.J. 1665 (2002) · Yale Law Journal · 2002
-
68 U. CHI. L. REV. (2001) · University of Chicago Law Review · 2001
-
23 MICH. J. INT'L L. 191 (2001) · Michigan Journal of International Law · 2001
-
7 FORDHAM J. CORP. & FIN. L. 457 (2001) · Fordham Journal of Corporate & Financial Law · 2001
-
98 MICH. L. REV. 1468 (2000) · Michigan Law Review · 2000
-
29 J. LEGAL STUD. (2000) · Journal of Legal Studies · 2000
-
29 J. LEGAL STUD. (2000) · Journal of Legal Studies · 2000
-
86 VA. L. REV. 1781 (2000) · Virginia Law Review · 2000