E. Scott Fraser

Publications

• International Arbitration of Multi-Party Contract Disputes: The Need for Change
  6 LOY. L. A. INT'L & COMP. L. REV. 427 (1983) · Loyola of Los Angeles International and Comparative Law Review · 1983

• The California Rules against Restraints on Alienation, Suspension of the Absolute Power of Alienation, and Perpetuities
  4 UC L.J. 101 (1953) · UC Law Journal · 1953
• Wilbur Harkness Cherry
  36 MINN. L. REV. 557 (1952) · Minnesota Law Review · 1952

• Review Article
  58 HARV. L. REV. 299 (1944) · Harvard Law Review · 1944
• Review of <i>Cases on Future Interests</i> by Lewis M. Simes
  7 U. CHI. L. REV. (1940) · University of Chicago Law Review · 1940

• Review Article
  46 HARV. L. REV. 1361 (1933) · Harvard Law Review · 1933
• Review Article
  42 YALE L.J. 809 (1933) · Yale Law Journal · 1933

• Rules against Restraints on Alienation and against Suspension of the Absolute Power of Alienation in Minnesota
  9 MINN. L. REV. 314 (1925) · Minnesota Law Review · 1925
• Rules against Restraints on Alienation and against Suspension of the Absolute Power of Alienation in Minnesota
  8 MINN. L. REV. 295 (1924) · Minnesota Law Review · 1924
• Rules against Restraints on Alienation and against Suspension of the Absolute Power of Alienation in Minnesota
  8 MINN. L. REV. 185 (1924) · Minnesota Law Review · 1924
• The Rationale of the Rule against Perpetuities
  6 MINN. L. REV. 560 (1922) · Minnesota Law Review · 1922
• Future Interests in Property in Minnesota
  4 MINN. L. REV. 307 (1920) · Minnesota Law Review · 1920

• Future Interests in Property in Minnesota
  3 MINN. L. REV. 320 (1919) · Minnesota Law Review · 1919
• Title to the Soil under Public Waters - The Trust Theory
  2 MINN. L. REV. 429 (1918) · Minnesota Law Review · 1918
• Title to the Soil under Public Waters - A Question of Fact
  2 MINN. L. REV. 313 (1918) · Minnesota Law Review · 1918