David S. Schwartz

Publications

• An Ugly Common Ancestor: Dred Scott, Roe and Enumerationism
  2025 UTAH L. REV. (2025) · Utah Law Review · 2025
• Is the Constitution of 1787 a White Supremacist Document? Against Essentialism in Constitutional Interpretation
  33 WM. & MARY BILL RTS. J. 63 (2024) · William & Mary Bill of Rights Journal · 2024
• Making Sense of 303 Creative: A Free Speech Solution in Search of a Problem
  39 CONST. COMMENT. 49 (2024) · Constitutional Commentary, Vol. 37 and later (2023–present) · 2024
• Framing the Framer: A Commentary on Treanor’s Gouverneur Morris as “Dishonest Scrivener”
  120 MICH. L. REV. ONLINE 51 (2023) · Michigan Law Review Online · 2023
• The Committee of Style and the Federalist Constitution
  70 BUFF. L. REV. 781 (2022) · Buffalo Law Review · 2022
• Recovering the Lost General Welfare Clause
  63 WM. & MARY L. REV. 857 (2022) · William & Mary Law Review · 2022
• Reconsidering the Constitution's Preamble: The Words That Made Us U.S.
  37 CONST. COMMENT. 55 (2022) · Constitutional Commentary, Vol. 37 and later (2023–present) · 2022
• The Other Madison Problem
  89 FORDHAM L. REV. 2033 (2021) · Fordham Law Review · 2021
• Foreword: The Federalist Constitution
  89 FORDHAM L. REV. 1669 (2021) · Fordham Law Review · 2021
• Burying McCulloch?
  73 ARK. L. REV. 129 (2020) · Arkansas Law Review · 2020
• McCulloch's "Perpetually Arising" Questions
  73 ARK. L. REV. 73 (2020) · Arkansas Law Review · 2020
• Coin, Currency, and Constitution: Reconsidering the National Bank Precedent
  118 MICH. L. REV. 1005 (2020) · Michigan Law Review · 2020

• McCulloch at 200
  72 ARK. L. REV. (2019) · Arkansas Law Review · 2019
• Defying McCulloch? Jackson’s Bank Veto Reconsidered
  72 ARK. L. REV. 129 (2019) · Arkansas Law Review · 2019
• Madison’s Waiver
  71 STAN. L. REV. 1 (2019) · Stanford Law Review · 2019
• An Error and an Evil: The Strange History of Implied Commerce Powers
  68 AM. U. L. REV. (2019) · American University Law Review · 2019
• The Conjunction Problem and the Logic of Jury Findings
  59 WM. & MARY L. REV. 619 (2017) · William & Mary Law Review · 2017
• Appendix: Conjunction-Problem v. Non-Conjunction-Problem Jurisdictions
  59 WM. & MARY L. REV. ONLINE 33 (2017) · William & Mary Law Review Online · 2017
• An Excess of Discretion? Thayer's Triumph and the Uncodified Exclusion of Speculative Evidence
  105 CAL. L. REV. 591 (2017) · California Law Review · 2017
• Justice Scalia's Jiggery-Pokery in Federal Arbitration Law
  101 MINN. L. REV. HEADNOTES 75 (2016) · Minnesota Law Review Headnotes · 2016
• Presidential Politics as a Safeguard of Federalism: The Case of Marijuana Legalization
  62 BUFF. L. REV. 599 (2014) · Buffalo Law Review · 2014
• High Federalism: Marijuana Legalization and the Limits of Federal Power to Regulate States
  35 CARDOZO L. REV. 567 (2013) · Cardozo Law Review · 2013
• Claim-Suppressing Arbitration: The New Rules
  87 IND. L.J. (2012) · Indiana Law Journal · 2012

• Mandatory Arbitration and Fairness
  84 NOTRE DAME L. REV. 1247 (2009) · Notre Dame Law Review · 2009
• If You Love Arbitration, Set It Free: How "Mandatory" Undermines "Arbitration"
  8 NV. L.J. FORUM 400 (2007) · Nevada Law Journal · 2007
• Correcting Federalism Mistakes in Statutory Interpretation: The Supreme Court and the Federal Arbitration Act
  67 LAW & CONTEMP. PROBS. 5 (2004) · Law and Contemporary Problems · 2004
• State Judges As Guardians of Federalism: Resisting the Federal Arbitration Act's Encroachment on State Law
  16 WASH. U. J. L. & POL'Y 129 (2004) · Washington University Journal of Law & Policy · 2004
• Understanding Remedy-Stripping Arbitration Clauses: Validity, Arbitrability, and Preclusion Principles
  38 U. S. F. L. REV. (2003) · University of San Francisco Law Review · 2003
• When is Sex because of Sex - The Causation Problem in Sexual Harassment Law
  150 U. PENN. L. REV. 1697 (2002) · University of Pennsylvania Law Review · 2002

• The Amorality of Consent
  74 CAL. L. REV. 2143 (1986) · California Law Review · 1986

• The Deregulation of Industry: A Built-in Bias
  51 IND. L.J. (1976) · Indiana Law Journal · 1976