David O. Taylor

Publications

• On Snow’s Intellectual Property and Immorality
  11 TEX. A & M J. PROP. L. 191 (2025) · Texas A&M Journal of Property Law · 2025
• Tribute to Professor Lack Bloom
  77 SMU L. REV. 345 (2024) · SMU Law Review · 2024
• Comment: On Patents And Appropriations—And Tragedies
  79 WASH. & LEE L. REV. 467 (2022) · Washington and Lee Law Review · 2022
• Justice Breyer and Patent Eligibility, 21 UIC Rev. Intell. Prop. L. 71 (2022)
  21 J. MARSHALL. REV. INTELL. PROP. L. (2022) · UIC Review of Intellectual Property Law · 2022
• Patent Eligibility and Investment
  41 CARDOZO L. REV. 2019 (2020) · Cardozo Law Review · 2020

• Final Report of the Berkeley Center for Law & Technology Section 101 Workshop: Addressing Patent Eligibility Challenges
  33 BERKELEY TECH. L.J. 551 (2018) · Berkeley Technology Law Journal · 2018
• Patents, Industrial Designs, and the Trans-Pacific Partnership: Articles 18.37–18.46 and 18.55–18.56
  20 SMU SCI. & TECH. L. REV. 165 (2017) · SMU Science and Technology Law Review · 2017
• A Report on the Economic Impact to Wyoming's Economy From a Potential Listing of the Sage Grouse
  17 WYO. L. REV 79 (2017) · Wyoming Law Review · 2017
• International Intellectual Property Law
  49 INT'L LAWYER 195 (2015) · The International Lawyer · 2015
• Using Reasonable Royalties to Value Patented Technology
  49 GA. L. REV. (2014) · Georgia Law Review · 2014
• Formalism and Antiformalism in Patent Law Adjudication: Rules and Standards
  Connecticut Law Review · 2013
• International Intellectual Property Law
  47 INT'L LAWYER 213 (2013) · The International Lawyer · 2013
• Formalism and Antiformalism in Patent Law Adjudication--Precedent and Policy
  66 SMU L. REV. 633 (2013) · SMU Law Review · 2013
• International Intellectual Property
  46 INT'L LAWYER 215 (2012) · The International Lawyer · 2012
• Clear But Unconvincing: The Federal Circuit's Invalidity Standard
  21 FORDHAM INTELL. PROP. MEDIA & ENT. L.J. 293 (2011) · Fordham Intellectual Property, Media and Entertainment Law Journal · 2011
• International Intellectual Property Law
  45 INT'L LAWYER 205 (2011) · The International Lawyer · 2011

• International Intellectual Property
  43 INT'L LAWYER 549 (2009) · The International Lawyer · 2009
• CONFUSING PATENT ELIGIBILITY
  84 TENN. L. REV. (2008) · Tennessee Law Review · 2008