David L. Shapiro

Publications

• An Incomplete Discussion of "Arising Under" Jurisdiction
  91 NOTRE DAME L. REV. 1931 (2016) · Notre Dame Law Review · 2016

• Habeas Corpus, Suspension, and Detention: Another View
  82 NOTRE DAME L. REV. 59 (2006) · Notre Dame Law Review · 2006

• Class Actions: The Class as Party and Client
  73 NOTRE DAME L. REV. 913 (1999) · Notre Dame Law Review · 1999
• Supplemental Jurisdiction: A Confession, an Avoidance, and a Proposal
  74 IND. L.J. (1998) · Indiana Law Journal · 1998
• Ethical Dilemmas for the Mental Health Professional: Issues Raised by Recent Supreme Court Decisions
  34 CAL. W. L. REV. (1997) · California Western Law Review · 1997
• Reflections on the Allocation of Jurisdiction between State and Federal Courts: A Response to "Reassessing the Allocation of Judicial Business between State and Federal Courts"
  78 VA. L. REV. 1839 (1992) · Virginia Law Review · 1992
• Justice Harlan and Justiciability: Notes on Two Dissents
  36 N.Y.L. SCH. L. REV. 199 (1991) · NYLS Law Review · 1991

• Federal Rule 16: A Look at the Theory and Practice of Rulemaking
  137 U. PENN. L. REV. 1969 (1989) · University of Pennsylvania Law Review · 1989
• Amici Curiae
  56 U. CHI. L. REV. 811 (1989) · University of Chicago Law Review · 1989
• Courts, Legislatures, and Paternalism
  74 VA. L. REV. 519 (1988) · Virginia Law Review · 1988

• Some Problems of Discovery in an Adversary System
  63 MINN. L. REV. 1055 (1979) · Minnesota Law Review · 1979
• Federal Diversity Jurisdiction: A Survey and a Proposal
  91 HARV. L. REV. 317 (1977) · Harvard Law Review · 1977
• Why Do Voters Vote?
  86 YALE L.J. 1532 (1977) · Yale Law Journal · 1977
• Mr. Justice Rehnquist: A Preliminary View
  90 HARV. L. REV. 293 (1976) · Harvard Law Review · 1976
• Review Article
  87 HARV. L. REV. 889 (1974) · Harvard Law Review · 1974
• Review Article
  74 COLUM. L. REV. 1015 (1974) · Columbia Law Review · 1974
• Federal Habeas Corpus: A Study in Massachusetts
  87 HARV. L. REV. 321 (1973) · Harvard Law Review · 1973
• The Fetish of Jury Trial in Civil Cases: A Comment on Rachal v. Hill
  85 HARV. L. REV. 442 (1971) · Harvard Law Review · 1971

• Some Thoughts on Intervention before Courts, Agencies, and Arbitrators
  81 HARV. L. REV. 721 (1968) · Harvard Law Review · 1968
• The Choice of Rulemaking or Adjudication in the Development of Administrative Policy
  78 HARV. L. REV. 921 (1965) · Harvard Law Review · 1965