David E. Seidelson

Publications

• Express Federal Preemption Provisions, State Law Actions for Damages, Congress, and the Supreme Court: A Penitent Seeks Redemption
  58 LA. L. REV. (1997) · Louisiana Law Review · 1997
• The Rescue Doctrine in Medical Malpractice and Product Liability Actions: So Much for Heroes
  17 MISS. COLL. L. REV. (1997) · Mississippi College Law Review · 1997
• Implied Assertions and Federal Rule of Evidence 801: A Continuing Quandary for Federal Courts
  16 MISS. COLL. L. REV. (1996) · Mississippi College Law Review · 1996
• Section 6.01 of the ALI's Complex Litigation Project: Function Follows Form
  54 LA. L. REV. (1994) · Louisiana Law Review · 1994
• CONFLICT OF LAWS: The Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act: Whose Conflicts Law? Whose Local Law? <i>Barkanic v. General Administration of Civil Aviation of the People's Republic of China</i>
  58 BROOK. L. REV. 427 (1992) · Brooklyn Law Review · 1992
• 1 (<i>Wortman</i>) + 1 (<i>Ferens)=6 (Years): That Can't Be Right - Can It? Statutes of Limitations and Supreme Court Inconsistency
  57 BROOK. L. REV. 787 (1991) · Brooklyn Law Review · 1991

• The Confrontation Clause and the Supreme Court: Some Good News and Some Bad News
  17 HOFSTRA L. REV. (1988) · Hofstra Law Review · 1988
• Lack of Informed Consent in Medical Malpractice and Product Liability Cases: The Burden of Presenting Evidence
  14 HOFSTRA L. REV. (1986) · Hofstra Law Review · 1986
• The Federal Rules of Evidence: A Few Surprises
  12 HOFSTRA L. REV. (1984) · Hofstra Law Review · 1984
• The Feres Exception to the Federal Tort Claims Act: New Insight Into an Old Problem
  11 HOFSTRA L. REV. (1983) · Hofstra Law Review · 1983
• Recasting World-Wide Volkswagen As a Source of Longer Jurisdictional Reach
  19 TULSA L. REV. (1983) · Tulsa Law Review · 1983

• The Attorney-Client Privilege and Client's Constitutional Rights
  6 HOFSTRA L. REV. (1978) · Hofstra Law Review · 1978
• The Federal Rules of Evidence: Rule 501, Klaxon and the Constitution
  5 HOFSTRA L. REV. (1976) · Hofstra Law Review · 1976
• Interest Analysis and Divorce Actions
  21 BUFF. L. REV. 315 (1972) · Buffalo Law Review · 1972

• Miscegenation Statutes and the Supreme Court: A Brief Prediction of What the Court Will Do and Why
  15 CATH. U. L. REV. 156 (1966) · Catholic University Law Review · 1966
• Medical Malpractice Cases and the Reluctant Expert
  16 CATH. U. L. REV. 158 (1966) · Catholic University Law Review · 1966