Cindy Galway Buys

Publications

• NOT SO RESPECTFUL CONSIDERATION: THE U.S. SUPREME COURT’S DEFERENCE OR LACK THEREOF TO FOREIGN GOVERNMENT STATEMENTS OF LAW
  10 PENN ST. J. L. & INT'L AFF. 50 (2022) · Penn State Journal of Law & International Affairs (2012 - Present) · 2022

• Conditions in U.S. Treaty Practice: New Data and Insights on a Growing Phenomenon
  14 SANTA CLARA J. INT'L L. 363 (2016) · Santa Clara Journal of International Law · 2016
• International Human Rights
  50 INT'L LAWYER 471 (2016) · The International Lawyer · 2016
• Introduction
  49 INT'L LAWYER 1 (2015) · The International Lawyer · 2015
• International Courts
  49 INT'L LAWYER 129 (2015) · The International Lawyer · 2015
• International Organizations: The Work of the United Nations in 2014
  49 INT'L LAWYER 389 (2015) · The International Lawyer · 2015
• Introduction
  48 INT'L LAWYER 1 (2014) · The International Lawyer · 2014
• United Nations and Other International Organizations
  48 INT'L LAWYER 505 (2014) · The International Lawyer · 2014
• International Courts
  48 INT'L LAWYER 135 (2014) · The International Lawyer · 2014
• Introduction
  47 INT'L LAWYER 1 (2013) · The International Lawyer · 2013
• Movsesian v. Victoria Vericherung and the Scope of the President's Foreign Affairs Power to Preempt Words
  32 N. ILL. U. L. REV. 205 (2012) · Northern Illinois University Law Review · 2012
• Do unto Others: The Importance of Better Compliance with Consular Notification Rights
  21 DUKE J. COMP. & INT'L L. 461 (2011) · Duke Journal of Comparative & International Law · 2011
• Nottebohm's Nightmare: Have We Exorcised the Ghosts of WWII Detention Programs or Do They Still Haunt Guantanamo?
  11 CHI.-KENT J. INT'L & COMP. L. (2011) · Chicago-Kent Journal of International and Comparative Law · 2011

• Burying Our Constitution in the Sand? Evaluating the Ostrich Response to the Use of International and Foreign Law in U.S. Constitutional Interpretation
  21 BYU J. PUB. L. 1 (2007) · Brigham Young University Journal of Public Law · 2007
• The Arbitrators' Duty to Respect the Parties' Choice of Law in Commercial Arbitration
  79 ST. JOHN'S L. REV. (2006) · St. John's Law Review · 2006