Christopher Slobogin

Publications

• The Red Hook Community Court: A Continuing Experiment
  Northwestern University Law Review · 2026
• Putting Police Body-Worn Camera Footage to Work: A Civil Liberties Evaluation of Truleo’s AI Analytics Platform
  46 CARDOZO L. REV. 2247 (2025) · Cardozo Law Review · 2025
• The Minimalist Alternative to Abolitionism: Focusing on the Non-Dangerous Many
  77 VAND. L. REV. 531 (2024) · Vanderbilt Law Review · 2024
• “A World of Difference”? Law Enforcement, Genetic Data, and the Fourth Amendment
  70 DUKE L.J. 705 (2021) · Duke Law Journal · 2021
• The Sacred Fourth Amendment Text
  119 MICH. L. REV. ONLINE 17 (2020) · Michigan Law Review Online · 2020
• The Case for a Federal Criminal Court System (and Sentencing Reform)
  108 CAL. L. REV. 941 (2020) · California Law Review · 2020

• Who Knows What, and When?: A Survey of the Privacy Policies Proffered by U.S. Direct-to-Consumer Genetic Testing Companies
  28 CORNELL J. L. & PUB. POL'Y 35 (2018) · Cornell Journal of Law and Public Policy · 2018
• Algorithmic Risk Assessments and the Double-Edged Sword of Youth
  96 WASH. U. L. REV. 681 (2018) · Washington University Law Review · 2018
• Community Control over Camera Surveillance: A Response to Bennett Capers’s Crime, Surveillance, and Communities
  40 FORDHAM URB. L.J. 993 (2016) · Fordham Urban Law Journal · 2016
• Gatekeeping Science: Using the Structure of Scientific Research to Distinguish Between Admissibility and Weight in Expert Testimony
  110 NW. U. L. REV. 859 (2016) · Northwestern University Law Review · 2016
• Teaching a Course on Regulation of Police Investigation—A Multi-Perspective, Problem-Oriented Course
  60 ST. LOUIS U. L.J. (2016) · Saint Louis University Law Journal · 2016
• The American Bar Association's Criminal Justice Mental Health Standards: Revisions for the Twenty-First Century
  44 UC L. CONST. Q. (2016) · UC Law Constitutional Quarterly · 2016
• Plea Bargaining and the Substantive and Procedural Goals of Criminal Justice: From Retribution and Adversarialism To Preventive Justice And Hybrid-Inquisitorialism
  57 WM. & MARY L. REV. 1505 (2016) · William & Mary Law Review · 2016
• Standing and Covert Surveillance
  42 PEPP. L. REV. 517 (2015) · Pepperdine Law Review · 2015
• Cause to Believe What? The Importance of Defining a Search's Object—Or, How the ABA Would Analyze the NSA Metadata Surveillance Program
  66 OKLA. L. REV. 725 (2014) · Oklahoma Law Review · 2014
• Group to Individual (G2i) Inference in Scientific Expert Testimony
  81 U. CHI. L. REV. (2014) · University of Chicago Law Review · 2014
• Scientizing Culpability: The Implications of Hall v. Florida and the Possibility of a “Scientific Stare Decisis”
  23 WM. & MARY BILL RTS. J. 415 (2014) · William & Mary Bill of Rights Journal · 2014
• Making the Most of United States v. Jones in a Surveillance Society: A Statutory Implementation of Mosaic Theory
  8 DUKE J. CONST. L. & PUB. POL'Y (2012) · Duke Journal of Constitutional Law & Public Policy · 2012
• Sell’s Conundrums: The Right of Incompetent Defendants to Refuse Anti-Psychotic Medication
  89 WASH. U. L. REV. 1523 (2012) · Washington University Law Review · 2012
• Sell’s Conundrums: The Right of Incompetent Defendants to Refuse Anti-Psychotic Medication
  Washington University Law Review Commentaries · 2012
• Prevention as the Primary Goal of Sentencing: The Modern Case for Indeterminate Dispositions in Criminal Cases
  48 SAN DIEGO L. REV. 1127 (2011) · San Diego Law Review · 2011
• Comparative Empiricism and Police Investigative Practices
  37 N. C. J. INT'L L. 321 (2011) · North Carolina Journal of International Law · 2011
• Government Dragnets
  73 LAW & CONTEMP. PROBS. 107 (2010) · Law and Contemporary Problems · 2010
• The Right to Voice Reprised
  40 SETON HALL L. REV. (2010) · Seton Hall Law Review · 2010
• Proportionality, Privacy, and Public Opinion: A Reply to Kerr and Swire
  94 MINN. L. REV. 1588 (2010) · Minnesota Law Review · 2010

• Introduction to the Symposium on the Model Penal Code's Sentencing Proposals
  61 FLA. L. REV. 665 (2009) · Florida Law Review · 2009
• Experts, Mental States, and Acts
  38 SETON HALL L. REV. (2008) · Seton Hall Law Review · 2008
• Government Data Mining and the Fourth Amendment
  75 U. CHI. L. REV. (2008) · University of Chicago Law Review · 2008
• Reconceptualizing Due Process in Juvenile Justice: Contributions from Law and Social Science
  57 UC L.J. 955 (2006) · UC Law Journal · 2006
• Mental Disorder as an Exemption from the Death Penalty: The ABA-IRR Task Force Recommendations
  54 CATH. U. L. REV. 1133 (2005) · Catholic University Law Review · 2005
• Subpoenas and Privacy
  54 DEPAUL L. REV. 805 (2005) · DePaul Law Review · 2005
• Prosecuting Martha: Federal Prosecutorial Power and the Need for a Law of Counts
  109 PENN ST. L. REV. 1107 (2005) · Penn State Law Review (2003 - Present) · 2005
• Prosecuting Martha: Federal Prosecutorial Power and the Need for a Law of Counts
  109 DICK. L. REV. 1107 (2005) · Dickinson Law Review (1908-2003) · 2005
• The Civilization of the Criminal Law
  58 VAND. L. REV. 121 (2005) · Vanderbilt Law Review · 2005
• What Atkins Could Mean for People with Mental Illness
  33 N. M. L. REV. 293 (2003) · New Mexico Law Review · 2003
• The structure of Expertise in Criminal Cases
  34 SETON HALL L. REV. (2003) · Seton Hall Law Review · 2003
• The Poverty Exception to the Fourth Amendment
  55 FLA. L. REV. 391 (2003) · Florida Law Review · 2003
• Peeping Techno-Toms and the Fourth Amendment: Seeing through Kyllo's Rules Governing Technological Surveillance
  86 MINN. L. REV. 1393 (2002) · Minnesota Law Review · 2002
• An Empirically Based Comparison of American and European Regulatory Approaches to Police Investigation
  22 MICH. J. INT'L L. 423 (2001) · Michigan Journal of International Law · 2001
• Ethics in Criminal Advocacy, Symposium, The Criminal Defense Lawyer's Fiduciary Duty to Clients With Mental Disability
  68 FORDHAM L. REV. 1581 (2000) · Fordham Law Review · 2000
• Foreword: Is Justice Just Us?
  28 HOFSTRA L. REV. (2000) · Hofstra Law Review · 2000
• Doubts About Daubert: Psychiatric Anecdata as a Case Study
  57 WASH. & LEE L. REV. 919 (2000) · Washington and Lee Law Review · 2000
• An End to Insanity: Recasting the Role of Mental Disability in Criminal Cases
  86 VA. L. REV. 1199 (2000) · Virginia Law Review · 2000

• Let's Not Bury Terry: A Call for Rejuvenation of the Proportionality Principle
  72 ST. JOHN'S L. REV. (1999) · St. John's Law Review · 1999
• Terms of Endearment and Articles of Impeachment
  51 FLA. L. REV. 615 (1999) · Florida Law Review · 1999
• Psychiatric Evidence in Criminal Trials: To Junk or Not To Junk?
  40 WM. & MARY L. REV. 1 (1998) · William & Mary Law Review · 1998
• Testilying: Police Perjury and What To Do about It
  67 U. COLO. L. REV. 1037 (1996) · University of Colorado Law Review · 1996
• Having It Both Ways: Proof that the U.S. Supreme Court Is "Unfairly" Prosecution-Oriented
  48 FLA. L. REV. 743 (1996) · Florida Law Review · 1996
• Mental Illness and the Death Penalty
  1 BERKELEY J. CRIM. L. 3 (1996) · Berkeley Journal of Criminal Law · 1996
• Should Juries and the Death Penalty Mix?: A Prediction About the Supreme Court's Answer
  70 IND. L.J. (1995) · Indiana Law Journal · 1995
• Reasonable Expectations of Privacy and Autonomy in Fourth Amendment Cases: An Empirical Look at “Understandings” Recognized and Permitted by Society
  42 DUKE L.J. 727 (1993) · Duke Law Journal · 1993
• Treatment of the Mentally Disabled: Rethinking the Community-First Idea
  69 NEB. L. REV. (1990) · Nebraska Law Review · 1990

• State Adoption of Federal Law: Exploring the Limits of Florida's "Forced Linkage" Amendment
  39 FLA. L. REV. 653 (1987) · Florida Law Review · 1987
• A Rational Approach to Responsibility
  83 MICH. L. REV. 820 (1985) · Michigan Law Review · 1985
• Dangerousness and Expertise
  133 U. PENN. L. REV. 97 (1984) · University of Pennsylvania Law Review · 1984
• The Role of Mental Health Professionals in the Criminal Process: The Case for Informed Speculation
  66 VA. L. REV. 427 (1980) · Virginia Law Review · 1980