Christopher A. Cotropia

Publications

• Nonobviousness and Unmotivated, Yet Minor, Inventions
  21 NW. J. TECH. & INTELL. PROP. (2024) · Northwestern Journal of Technology and Intellectual Property · 2024
• The SCALES Project: Making Federal Court Records Free
  119 NW. U. L. REV. 23 (2024) · Northwestern University Law Review · 2024

• Higher Education and the DMCA
  25 RICH. J. L. & TECH. 1 (2018) · Richmond Journal of Law & Technology · 2018
• Gender Disparity in Law Review Citation Rates
  59 WM. & MARY L. REV. 771 (2018) · William & Mary Law Review · 2018
• Physicalism and Patent Theory
  69 VAND. L. REV. 1543 (2016) · Vanderbilt Law Review · 2016
• Patent Claim Interpretation Review: Deference or Correction Driven?
  2014 BYU L. REV. 1095 (2014) · BYU Law Review · 2014
• Predictability and Nonobviousness in Patent Law After KSR
  20 MICH. TELECOMM. & TECH. L. REV. 391 (2014) · Michigan Telecommunications & Technology Law Review · 2014
• Unpacking Patent Assertion Entities (PAES)
  99 MINN. L. REV. 649 (2014) · Minnesota Law Review · 2014
• What is the "Invention"?
  53 WM. & MARY L. REV. 1855 (2012) · William & Mary Law Review · 2012
• Determining Uniformity within the Federal Circuit by Measuring Dissent and En Banc Review
  43 LOY. L. A. L. REV. 801 (2010) · Loyola of Los Angeles Law Review · 2010
• THE INDIVIDUAL INVENTOR MOTIF IN THE AGE OF THE PATENT TROLL
  Yale Journal of Law and Technology · 2010

• The Role of the Federal Circuit
  Loyola of Los Angeles Law Review · 2009
• The Folly of Early Filing in Patent Law
  61 UC L.J. 65 (2009) · UC Law Journal · 2009
• Copying in Patent Law
  87 N. C. L. REV. 1421 (2009) · North Carolina Law Review · 2009
• Modernizing Patent Law's Inequitable Conduct Doctrine
  24 BERKELEY TECH. L.J. 723 (2009) · Berkeley Technology Law Journal · 2009
• Patent Law Viewed Through an Evidentiary Lens: The "Suggestion Test" as a Rule of Evidence
  2006 BYU L. REV. 1517 (2006) · BYU Law Review · 2006
• Nonobviousness and the Federal Circuit: An Empirical Analysis of Recent Case Law
  82 NOTRE DAME L. REV. 911 (2006) · Notre Dame Law Review · 2006
• Patent Claim Interpretation Methodologies and Their Claim Scope Paradigms
  47 WM. & MARY L. REV. 49 (2005) · William & Mary Law Review · 2005
• Counterclaims, the Well-Pleaded Complaint, and Federal Jurisdiction
  33 HOFSTRA L. REV. (2004) · Hofstra Law Review · 2004
• Arising Under Jurisdiction and Uniformity in Patent Law
  9 MICH. TELECOMM. & TECH. L. REV. 253 (2003) · Michigan Telecommunications & Technology Law Review · 2003