Charles Fairman

Publications

• Review Article
  73 COLUM. L. REV. 913 (1973) · Columbia Law Review · 1973
• Review Article
  85 HARV. L. REV. 1082 (1972) · Harvard Law Review · 1972

• Review Article
  70 HARV. L. REV. 764 (1957) · Harvard Law Review · 1957
• Samuel F. Miller, Justice of the Supreme Court, 1862-1890
  10 VAND. L. REV. 193 (1957) · Vanderbilt Law Review · 1957
• The Supreme Court, 1955 Term
  70 HARV. L. REV. 83 (1956) · Harvard Law Review · 1956
• Associate Justice of the Supreme Court
  55 COLUM. L. REV. 445 (1955) · Columbia Law Review · 1955
• Shiras: Justice George Shiras, Jr., of Pittsburgh: A Chronicle of His Family, Life, and Times
  63 YALE L.J. 431 (1954) · Yale Law Journal · 1954
• Review Article
  63 YALE L.J. 431 (1954) · Yale Law Journal · 1954
• A Reply to Professor Crosskey
  22 U. CHI. L. REV. (1954) · University of Chicago Law Review · 1954
• The So-Called Granger Cases, Lord Hale, and Justice Bradley
  5 STAN. L. REV. 587 (1953) · Stanford Law Review · 1953
• The Supreme Court and the Constitutional Limitations on State Governmental Authority
  21 U. CHI. L. REV. (1953) · University of Chicago Law Review · 1953
• THE COURT AND THE CONSTITUTION, by Owen J. Roberts. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, 1951. Pp. 102. $2.00.
  12 LA. L. REV. (1952) · Louisiana Law Review · 1952
• Book Reviews
  100 U. PENN. L. REV. 296 (1951) · University of Pennsylvania Law Review · 1951

• Does the Fourteenth Amendment Incorporate the Bill of Rights? The Original Understanding
  2 STAN. L. REV. 5 (1949) · Stanford Law Review · 1949
• Some New Problems of the Constitution Following the Flag
  1 STAN. L. REV. 587 (1949) · Stanford Law Review · 1949
• A Modern Law of Nations
  1 STAN. L. REV. 581 (1949) · Stanford Law Review · 1949
• The Education of a Justice: Justice Bradley and Some of His Colleagues
  1 STAN. L. REV. 217 (1949) · Stanford Law Review · 1949
• The Writing of Judicial Biography- An Introduction
  24 IND. L.J. (1949) · Indiana Law Journal · 1949
• Some Observations on Military Occupation
  32 MINN. L. REV. 319 (1948) · Minnesota Law Review · 1948
• Review Article
  35 CAL. L. REV. 471 (1947) · California Law Review · 1947
• Review Article
  35 CAL. L. REV. 608 (1947) · California Law Review · 1947
• The Supreme Court on Military Jurisdiction: Martial Rule in Hawaii and the Yamashita Case
  59 HARV. L. REV. 833 (1946) · Harvard Law Review · 1946
• Review of <i>Political Reconstruction</i> by Karl Loewenstein
  14 U. CHI. L. REV. (1946) · University of Chicago Law Review · 1946
• The Law of Martial Rule and the National Emergency
  55 HARV. L. REV. 1253 (1942) · Harvard Law Review · 1942
• Mr. Justice Bradley's Appointment to the Supreme Court and the Legal Tender Cases
  54 HARV. L. REV. 977 (1941) · Harvard Law Review · 1941
• Review Article
  55 HARV. L. REV. 172 (1941) · Harvard Law Review · 1941
• Mr. Justice Bradley's Appointment to the Supreme Court and the Legal Tender Cases [concluded]
  54 HARV. L. REV. 1128 (1941) · Harvard Law Review · 1941
• Review Article
  53 HARV. L. REV. 696 (1940) · Harvard Law Review · 1940
• Review Article
  40 COLUM. L. REV. 564 (1940) · Columbia Law Review · 1940
• Review Article
  49 YALE L.J. 1336 (1940) · Yale Law Journal · 1940
• Review Article
  29 CAL. L. REV. 98 (1940) · California Law Review · 1940
• Review Article
  28 CAL. L. REV. 544 (1940) · California Law Review · 1940

• Review Article
  53 HARV. L. REV. 349 (1939) · Harvard Law Review · 1939
• Review of “Our Eleven Chief Justices: A History of the Supreme Court in Terms of Their Personalities,” By Kenneth Bernard Umbreit
  24 WASH. U. L. REV. 430 (1939) · Washington University Law Review · 1939
• The Retirement of Federal Judges
  51 HARV. L. REV. 397 (1938) · Harvard Law Review · 1938
• Review Article
  49 HARV. L. REV. 166 (1935) · Harvard Law Review · 1935
• Martial Rule in the Light of Sterling V. Constantin
  19 CORNELL L. REV. 20 (1933) · Cornell Law Review · 1933
• Review Article
  45 HARV. L. REV. 400 (1931) · Harvard Law Review · 1931
• Review Article
  31 COLUM. L. REV. 917 (1931) · Columbia Law Review · 1931