Bradford C. Mank

Publications

• Enabling Unpredictability and the Perils of Judicial Science and Math in Ohio v. EPA
  94 U. CIN. L. REV. 443 (2025) · University of Cincinnati Law Review · 2025
• The Future of State Standing and the Controversial <i>Massachusetts v. EPA Decision: <i>United States v. Texas</i> and <i>Biden v. Nebraska </i> Provide Mixed Signals
  75 CASE W. RES. L. REV. 531 (2024) · Case Western Reserve Law Review · 2024
• Can Judges Use Due Process Concepts in <i>Obergefell</i> to Impose Judicial Regulation of Greenhouse Gases and Climate Change?: The Crucial Case of <i>Juliana v. United States</i>
  7 BELMONT L. REV. (2020) · Belmont Law Review · 2020

• State Standing and National Injunctions
  94 NOTRE DAME L. REV. 1955 (2019) · Notre Dame Law Review · 2019
• Data Breaches, Identity Theft, and Article III Standing: Will the Supreme Court Resolve the Split in the Circuits?
  92 NOTRE DAME L. REV. 1323 (2017) · Notre Dame Law Review · 2017
• The Supreme Court Acknowledges Congress’ Authority to Confer Informational Standing in Spokeo, Inc. v. Robins
  94 WASH. U. L. REV. 1377 (2017) · Washington University Law Review · 2017
• Article III Standing for Private Plaintiffs Challenging Greenhouse Gas Regulations
  53 SAN DIEGO L. REV. 287 (2016) · San Diego Law Review · 2016
• No Article III Standing for Private Plaintiffs Challenging State Greenhouse Gas Regulations: The Ninth Circuit's Decision in Washington Environmental Council v. Bellon
  63 AM. U. L. REV. (2014) · American University Law Review · 2014
• Is Prudential Standing Jurisdictional?
  64 CASE W. RES. L. REV. 413 (2013) · Case Western Reserve Law Review · 2013
• Reading the Standing Tea Leaves in American Electric Power Co. v. Connecticut
  46 U. RICH. L. REV. 543 (2012) · University of Richmond Law Review · 2012
• Standing in Monsanto Co. v. Geertson Seed Farms: Using Economic Injury as a Basis for Standing When Environmental Harm is Difficult to Prove
  115 DICK. L. REV. 307 (2010) · Dickinson Law Review (1908-2003) · 2010

• The Supreme Court's New Public-Private Distinction under the Dormant Commerce Clause: Avoiding the Traditional versus Nontraditional Classification Trap
  37 UC L. CONST. Q. (2009) · UC Law Constitutional Quarterly · 2009
• Standing and Statistical Persons: A Risk-Based Approach to Standing
  36 ECOLOGY L. Q. 665 (2009) · Ecology Law Quarterly · 2009
• Should States Have Greater Standing Rights than Ordinary Citizens?: Massachusetts v. EPA's New Standing Test for States
  49 WM. & MARY L. REV. 1701 (2008) · William & Mary Law Review · 2008
• After Gonzales v. Raich: Is the Endangered Species Act Constitutional Under the Commerce Clause
  78 U. COLO. L. REV. 375 (2007) · University of Colorado Law Review · 2007
• Are Public Facilities Different from Private Ones: Adopting a New Standard of Review for the Dormant Commerce Clause
  60 SMU L. REV. 157 (2007) · SMU Law Review · 2007
• Can Plaintiffs Use Multinational Environmental Treaties as Customary International Law to Sue under the Alien Tort Statute?
  2007 UTAH L. REV. (2007) · Utah Law Review · 2007
• Can Administrative Regulations Interpret Rights Enforceable Under Section 1983?: Why Chevron Deference Survives Sandoval and Gonzaga
  32 FLA. ST. U. L. REV. (2005) · Florida State University Law Review · 2005
• CLAPPER V. AMNESTY INTERNATIONAL: TWO OR THREE COMPETING PHILOSOPHIES OF STANDING LAW?
  81 TENN. L. REV. (2005) · Tennessee Law Review · 2005
• Can Congress Regulate Intrastate Endangered Species Under the Commerce Clause? The Split in the Circuits over Whether the Regulated Activity is Private Commercial Development or the Taking of Protected Species
  69 BROOK. L. REV. 923 (2004) · Brooklyn Law Review · 2004
• Are Anti-Retaliation Regulations in Title VI or Title IX Enforceable in a Private Right of Action: Does Sandoval or Sullivan Control This Question?
  35 SETON HALL L. REV. (2004) · Seton Hall Law Review · 2004
• The Murky Future of the Clean Water Act after SWANCC: Using a Hydrological Connection Approach to Saving the Clean Water Act
  30 ECOLOGY L. Q. 811 (2003) · Ecology Law Quarterly · 2003

• Textualism's Selective Canons of Statutory Construction: Reinvigorating Individual Liberties, Legislative Authority, and Deference to Executive Agencies
  86 KY. L.J. (1998) · Kentucky Law Journal · 1998
• The Environmental Protection Agency's Project XL and Other Regulatory Reform Initiatives: The Need for Legislative Authorization
  25 ECOLOGY L. Q. 1 (1998) · Ecology Law Quarterly · 1998
• Is a Textualist Approach to Statutory Interpretation Pro-Environmentalist?: Why Pragmatic Agency Decisionmaking Is Better than Judicial Literalism
  53 WASH. & LEE L. REV. 1231 (1996) · Washington and Lee Law Review · 1996
• Out-of-State Trash: Solid Waste and the Dormant Commerce Clause
  38 URB. L. ANN.; J. URB. & CONTEMP. L. 25 (1990) · Urban Law Annual ; Journal of Urban and Contemporary Law · 1990

• Broken Promises and Involuntary Confessions: May a State Introduce Incriminating Statements Made by a Defendant as a Result of Promises in a Plea Bargain Agreement if the Defendant Breaches That Agreement
  36 CLEV. ST. L. REV. 423 (1988) · Cleveland State Law Review · 1988