-
75 DUKE L.J. 565 (2026) · Duke Law Journal · 2026
-
92 U. CHI. L. REV. (2025) · University of Chicago Law Review · 2025
-
92 U. CHI. L. REV. (2025) · University of Chicago Law Review · 2025
-
100 NOTRE DAME L. REV. (2024) · Notre Dame Law Review · 2024
-
122 MICH. L. REV. 1113 (2024) · Michigan Law Review · 2024
-
72 EMORY L.J. 1105 (2023) · Emory Law Journal · 2023
-
111 CAL. L. REV. 1633 (2023) · California Law Review · 2023
-
117 NW. U. L. REV. 1099 (2023) · Northwestern University Law Review · 2023
-
Emory Law Journal · 2022
-
89 U. CHI. L. REV. (2022) · University of Chicago Law Review · 2022
-
89 U. CHI. L. REV. (2022) · University of Chicago Law Review · 2022
-
23 CHI. J. INT'L L. (2022) · Chicago Journal of International Law · 2022
-
37 CONST. COMMENT. 365 (2022) · Constitutional Commentary, Vol. 37 and later (2023–present) · 2022
-
110 GEO. L.J. (2022) · Georgetown Law Journal · 2022
-
2022 SUP. CT. REV. (2022) · Supreme Court Review · 2022
-
88 U. CHI. L. REV. (2021) · University of Chicago Law Review · 2021
-
88 U. CHI. L. REV. (2021) · University of Chicago Law Review · 2021
-
115 NW. U. L. REV. 1055 (2021) · Northwestern University Law Review · 2021
-
118 MICH. L. REV. 1027 (2020) · Michigan Law Review · 2020
-
87 U. CHI. L. REV. (2020) · University of Chicago Law Review · 2020
-
68 DUKE L.J. 1043 (2019) · Duke Law Journal · 2019
-
118 MICH. L. REV. 47 (2019) · Michigan Law Review · 2019
-
113 NW. U. L. REV. 701 (2019) · Northwestern University Law Review · 2019
-
94 NOTRE DAME L. REV. 2127 (2019) · Notre Dame Law Review · 2019
-
103 CORNELL L. REV. 1211 (2018) · Cornell Law Review · 2018
-
116 MICH. L. REV. 1123 (2018) · Michigan Law Review · 2018
-
85 U. CHI. L. REV. (2018) · University of Chicago Law Review · 2018
-
85 U. CHI. L. REV. (2018) · University of Chicago Law Review · 2018
-
85 U. CHI. L. REV. (2018) · University of Chicago Law Review · 2018
-
101 MINN. L. REV. 2397 (2017) · Minnesota Law Review · 2017
-
2016 U. CHI. LEGAL F. (2016) · University of Chicago Legal Forum · 2016
-
104 CAL. L. REV. 1401 (2016) · California Law Review · 2016
-
126 YALE L.J. 346 (2016) · Yale Law Journal · 2016
-
65 DUKE L.J. (2015) · Duke Law Journal · 2015
-
106 NW. U. L. REV. 417 (2015) · Northwestern University Law Review · 2015
-
82 U. CHI. L. REV. (2015) · University of Chicago Law Review · 2015
-
83 U. CHI. L. REV. (2015) · University of Chicago Law Review · 2015
-
103 CAL. L. REV. 1679 (2015) · California Law Review · 2015
-
81 U. CHI. L. REV. (2014) · University of Chicago Law Review · 2014
-
66 STAN. L. REV. (2014) · Stanford Law Review · 2014
-
98 CORNELL L. REV. 637 (2013) · Cornell Law Review · 2013
-
80 U. CHI. L. REV. (2013) · University of Chicago Law Review · 2013
-
66 VAND. L. REV. 723 (2013) · Vanderbilt Law Review · 2013
-
65 STAN. L. REV. 1 (2013) · Stanford Law Review · 2013
-
61 DUKE L.J. 1415 (2012) · Duke Law Journal · 2012
-
79 U. CHI. L. REV. (2012) · University of Chicago Law Review · 2012
-
100 CAL. L. REV. 579 (2012) · California Law Review · 2012
-
100 CAL. L. REV. 887 (2012) · California Law Review · 2012
-
101 J. CRIM. L. & CRIMINOLOGY 335 (2011) · Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology · 2011
-
2 DUKE F. FOR L. & SOC. CHANGE 39 (2010) · Duke Forum for Law & Social Change · 2010
-
26 CONST. COMMENT. 385 (2010) · Constitutional Commentary · 2010
-
Duke Forum for Law & Social Change (Symposium) · 2010
-
77 U. CHI. L. REV. 1055 (2010) · University of Chicago Law Review · 2010