Andrew M. Koppelman

Publications

• The Supreme Court's Gay Rights-Religious Liberty Contortions
  100 CHI.-KENT. L. REV. 899 (2025) · Chicago-Kent Law Review · 2025
• Burning Questions: A Response to Fishkin, Long, Lu, Mack, and Vallier
  26 J. CONTEMP. LEGAL ISSUES 521 (2025) · The Journal of Contemporary Legal Issues · 2025
• The Use and Abuse of Tradition: A Comment on DeGirolami’s Traditionalism Rising
  24 J. CONTEMP. LEGAL ISSUES 187 (2024) · The Journal of Contemporary Legal Issues · 2024
• The Ugly Rhetoric of <em>Dobbs</em>, Or, Why Jack Balkin Is History
  33 WM. & MARY BILL RTS. J. 351 (2024) · William & Mary Bill of Rights Journal · 2024
• The Emerging First Amendment Right to Mistreat Students
  73 CASE W. RES. L. REV. 1209 (2023) · Case Western Reserve Law Review · 2023
• Justice Alito, Originalism, and the Aztecs
  54 LOY. U. CHI. L.J. 455 (2023) · Loyola University Chicago Law Journal · 2023
• "It is Tash Whom He Serves": Deneen and Vermeule on Liberalism
  98 NOTRE DAME L. REV. 1525 (2023) · Notre Dame Law Review · 2023
• Religious Liberty as a Judicial Autoimmune Disorder: The Supreme Court Repudiates Its Own Authority in Kennedy v. Bremerton School District
  74 UC L.J. 1751 (2023) · UC Law Journal · 2023
• Bostock and Textualism: A Response to Berman and Krishnamurthi
  98 NOTRE DAME L. REV. REFLECTION 89 (2022) · Notre Dame Law Review Reflection · 2022
• Michael Perry and Human Rights
  23 J. CONTEMP. LEGAL ISSUES 485 (2022) · The Journal of Contemporary Legal Issues · 2022
• Gay Rights, Religious Liberty, and the Misleading Racism Analogy
  2020 BYU L. REV. 1 (2020) · BYU Law Review · 2020
• Discrimination against Minorities
  45 U. DAYTON L. REV. (2020) · University of Dayton Law Review · 2020
• Bostock, LGBT Discrimination, and the Subtractive Moves
  105 MINN. L. REV. HEADNOTES 1 (2020) · Minnesota Law Review Headnotes · 2020
• "The Function of the Independent Lawyer as a Guardian of Our Freedom": The Great Stevens Dissent in Walters
  114 NW. U. L. REV. 1771 (2020) · Northwestern University Law Review · 2020

• This Isn’t About You: A Comment on Smith’s Pagans and Christians in the City
  56 SAN DIEGO L. REV. 393 (2019) · San Diego Law Review · 2019
• Tebbe and Reflective Equilibrium
  31 J. CIV. RTS. & ECON. DEV. (2018) · Journal of Civil Rights and Economic Development · 2018
• Entertaining Satan: Why We Tolerate Terrorist Incitement
  86 FORDHAM L. REV. 535 (2017) · Fordham Law Review · 2017
• Unparadoxical Liberalism
  54 SAN DIEGO L. REV. 257 (2017) · San Diego Law Review · 2017
• Introduction: The Moral Demands of Commercial Speech
  25 WM. & MARY BILL RTS. J. 761 (2017) · William & Mary Bill of Rights Journal · 2017
• Revenge Pornography and First Amendment Exceptions
  65 EMORY L.J. 661 (2016) · Emory Law Journal · 2016
• Lupu, Tuttle, and Singling Out Religion
  Northwestern University Law Review · 2016
• A Free Speech Response to the Gay Rights/Religious Liberty Conflict
  110 NW. U. L. REV. 1125 (2016) · Northwestern University Law Review · 2016
• Veil of Ignorance: Tunnel Constructivism in Free Speech Theory
  107 NW. U. L. REV. 647 (2015) · Northwestern University Law Review · 2015
• Justice Stevens, Religious Enthusiast
  106 NW. U. L. REV. 567 (2015) · Northwestern University Law Review · 2015
• Six Overrulings
  113 MICH. L. REV. 1043 (2015) · Michigan Law Review · 2015
• A Marriage By Any Other Name: Why Civil Unions Should Receive Federal Recognition
  Indiana Journal of Law and Social Equality · 2015
• You're All Individuals: Brettschneider on Free Speech
  79 BROOK. L. REV. (2014) · Brooklyn Law Review · 2014
• Beyond Levels of Scrutiny: Windsor and "Bare Desire to Harm"
  64 CASE W. RES. L. REV. 1045 (2014) · Case Western Reserve Law Review · 2014
• Theorists, Get Over Yourselves: A Response to Steven D. Smith
  41 PEPP. L. REV. 937 (2014) · Pepperdine Law Review · 2014
• “Religion” as a Bundle of Legal Proxies: Reply to Micah Schwartzman
  51 SAN DIEGO L. REV. 1079 (2014) · San Diego Law Review · 2014
• Stanley Fish as Lord Grantham
  9 FIU L. REV. 57 (2013) · FIU Law Review · 2013
• Why Scalia Should Have Voted to Overturn DOMA
  108 NW. U. L. REV. (2013) · Northwestern University Law Review · 2013
• And I Don’t Care What It Is: Religious Neutrality in American Law
  39 PEPP. L. REV. (2013) · Pepperdine Law Review · 2013
• Another Solipsism: Rae Langton on Sexual Fantasy
  5 WASH. U. JUR. REV. 163 (2013) · Washington University Jurisprudence Review · 2013
• Religion's Specialized Specialness: A Response to Micah Schwartzman, What If Religion Is Not Special; 79 U Chi L Rev 1351 (2012)
  79 U. CHI. L. REV. ONLINE (2012) · University of Chicago Law Review Online · 2012
• Respect and Contempt in Constitutional Law, or, Is Jack Balkin Heartbreaking?
  71 MD. L. REV. 1126 (2012) · Maryland Law Review · 2012
• How Shall I Praise Thee? Brian Leiter on Respect for Religion
  47 SAN DIEGO L. REV. 961 (2010) · San Diego Law Review · 2010
• The Nonproblem of Fundamentalism
  18 WM. & MARY BILL RTS. J. 915 (2010) · William & Mary Bill of Rights Journal · 2010
• Why Jack Balkin Is Disgusting
  27 CONST. COMMENT. 177 (2010) · Constitutional Commentary · 2010

• Madisonian Pornography or, the Importance of Jeffrey Sherman
  84 CHI.-KENT. L. REV. 597 (2009) · Chicago-Kent Law Review · 2009
• Free Speech & (and) Election Law: Freedom of Speech vs. Anti-Discrimination Laws
  31 N. C. CENT. L. REV. 207 (2009) · North Carolina Central Law Review · 2009
• The Troublesome Religious Roots of Religious Neutrality
  84 NOTRE DAME L. REV. 865 (2009) · Notre Dame Law Review · 2009
• Corruption of Religion and the Establishment Clause
  50 WM. & MARY L. REV. 1831 (2009) · William & Mary Law Review · 2009
• Religious Establishment and Autonomy
  25 CONST. COMMENT. 291 (2008) · Constitutional Commentary · 2008
• The Difference the Mini-DOMAs Make
  38 LOY. U. CHI. L.J. 265 (2007) · Loyola University Chicago Law Journal · 2007
• You Can't Hurry Love: Why Antidiscrimination Protections for Gay People Should Have Religious Exemptions
  72 BROOK. L. REV. (2006) · Brooklyn Law Review · 2006
• Justice for Large Earlobes! A Comment on Richard Arneson's "What Is Wrongful Discrimination?"
  43 SAN DIEGO L. REV. 809 (2006) · San Diego Law Review · 2006
• Against Blanket Interstate Nonrecognition of Same-Sex Marriage
  17 YALE J. L. & FEMINISM 205 (2006) · Yale Journal of Law & Feminism · 2006
• Interstate Recognition of Same-Sex Marriages and Civil Unions: A Handbook for Judges
  153 U. PENN. L. REV. 2143 (2005) · University of Pennsylvania Law Review · 2005
• Should Noncommercial Associations Have an Absolute Right to Discriminate?
  67 LAW & CONTEMP. PROBS. 27 (2004) · Law and Contemporary Problems · 2004
• Lawrence's Penumbra
  88 MINN. L. REV. 1171 (2004) · Minnesota Law Review · 2004
• No Expressly Religious Orthodoxy: A Response to Steven D. Smith
  78 CHI.-KENT. L. REV. 729 (2003) · Chicago-Kent Law Review · 2003
• How "Decentralization" Rationalizes Oligarchy: John McGinnis and the Rehnquist Court
  20 CONST. COMMENT. 11 (2003) · Constitutional Commentary · 2003
• Signs of the Times: <i>Dale v. Boy Scouts of America</i> and the Changing Meaning of Nondiscrimination
  23 CARDOZO L. REV. 1819 (2002) · Cardozo Law Review · 2002
• The Right to Privacy?
  2002 U. CHI. LEGAL F. (2002) · University of Chicago Legal Forum · 2002
• Secular Purpose
  88 VA. L. REV. 87 (2002) · Virginia Law Review · 2002
• On the Moral Foundations of Legal Expressivism
  60 MD. L. REV. 777 (2001) · Maryland Law Review · 2001
• Measured Endorsement
  60 MD. L. REV. 713 (2001) · Maryland Law Review · 2001
• Should the Government Recognize Same-Sex Marriage? Session Two: Legal, Equitable, and Political Issues
  7 U. CHI. L. SCH. ROUNDTABLE (2000) · The University of Chicago Law School Roundtable · 2000

• Akhil Amar and the Establishment Clause
  33 U. RICH. L. REV. 393 (1999) · University of Richmond Law Review · 1999
• Is Marriage Inherently Heterosexual;Forum: Sexual Morality and the Possibility of Same-Sex Marriage
  42 AM. J. JURIS. 51 (1997) · American Journal of Jurisprudence · 1997
• Romer v. Evans and Invidious Intent
  6 WM. & MARY BILL RTS. J. 89 (1997) · William & Mary Bill of Rights Journal · 1997
• You Say You Want a Revolution? The Case against the Transformation of Culture through Antidiscrimination Laws
  95 MICH. L. REV. 1588 (1997) · Michigan Law Review · 1997
• Three Arguments for Gay Rights
  95 MICH. L. REV. 1636 (1997) · Michigan Law Review · 1997
• Sex Equality and/or the Family: From Bloom vs. Okin to Rousseau vs. Hegel
  4 YALE J. L. & HUMAN. 391 (1993) · Yale Journal of Law & the Humanities · 1993

• The Miscegenation Analogy: Sodomy Law as Sex Discrimination
  98 YALE L.J. 145 (1988) · Yale Law Journal · 1988