Abner S. Greene

Publications

• When is Free Speech “Beyond” the Constitution?
  27 J. CONTEMP. LEGAL ISSUES 23 (2025) · The Journal of Contemporary Legal Issues · 2025
• The Dilemma of Liberal Pluralism
  70 BUFF. L. REV. 1637 (2022) · Buffalo Law Review · 2022
• Liberalism and the Distinctiveness of Religious Belief
  35 CONST. COMMENT. 207 (2020) · Constitutional Commentary · 2020

• Barnette and Masterpiece Cakeshop: Some Unanswered Questions
  13 FIU L. REV. 667 (2019) · FIU Law Review · 2019
• Christians and Pagans
  57 J. CATH. LEGAL STUD. (2019) · Journal of Catholic Legal Studies · 2019
• Government Endorsement: A Reply to Nelson Tebbe's Government Nonendorsement
  98 MINN. L. REV. HEADNOTES 87 (2013) · Minnesota Law Review Headnotes · 2013
• Religion and Theistic Faith: On Koppelman, Leiter, Secular Purpose, and Accommodations
  49 TULSA L. REV. 441 (2013) · Tulsa Law Review · 2013
• State Speech and Political Liberalism
  28 CONST. COMMENT. 420 (2013) · Constitutional Commentary · 2013
• Interpretive Schizophrenia: How Congressional Standing Can Solve the Enforce-but-not-Defend Problem
  81 FORDHAM L. REV. 577 (2012) · Fordham Law Review · 2012
• Speech Platforms
  61 CASE W. RES. L. REV. 1253 (2011) · Case Western Reserve Law Review · 2011
• (Mis)Attribution
  87 DENV. L. REV. 833 (2010) · Denver Law Review · 2010

• The Fit Dimension
  75 FORDHAM L. REV. 2921 (2007) · Fordham Law Review · 2007
• Against Interpretive Obligation (To the Supreme Court)
  75 FORDHAM L. REV. 1661 (2006) · Fordham Law Review · 2006
• The Missing Step of Textualism
  74 FORDHAM L. REV. 1913 (2006) · Fordham Law Review · 2006
• The Apparent Consistency of Religion Clause Doctrine
  21 WASH. U. J. L. & POL'Y 225 (2006) · Washington University Journal of Law & Policy · 2006
• Can We Be Legal Positivists Without Being Constitutional Positivists?
  73 FORDHAM L. REV. 1401 (2005) · Fordham Law Review · 2005
• Is There a First Amendment Defense for Bush v. Gore
  80 NOTRE DAME L. REV. 1643 (2005) · Notre Dame Law Review · 2005
• Constitutional Reductionism, Rawls, and the Religion Clauses
  72 FORDHAM L. REV. 2089 (2004) · Fordham Law Review · 2004
• Constitutional (IR) Responsibility
  71 FORDHAM L. REV. 1807 (2003) · Fordham Law Review · 2003
• Government Speech on Unsettled Issues
  69 FORDHAM L. REV. 1667 (2001) · Fordham Law Review · 2001
• Civil Society and Multiple Repositories of Power
  75 CHI.-KENT. L. REV. 477 (2000) · Chicago-Kent Law Review · 2000
• Government of the Good
  53 VAND. L. REV. xv (2000) · Vanderbilt Law Review · 2000

• Work of Knowledge
  72 NOTRE DAME L. REV. 1479 (1999) · Notre Dame Law Review · 1999
• Why Vouchers Are Unconstitutional, and Why They're Not
  13 NOTRE DAME J. L. ETHICS & PUB. POL'Y 397 (1999) · Notre Dame Journal of Law, Ethics & Public Policy · 1999
• Discounting Accountability
  65 FORDHAM L. REV. 1489 (1997) · Fordham Law Review · 1997
• The Pledge of Allegiance Problem
  64 FORDHAM L. REV. 451 (1995) · Fordham Law Review · 1995
• Checks and Balances in an Era of Presidential Lawmaking
  61 U. CHI. L. REV. (1994) · University of Chicago Law Review · 1994
• Adjudicative Retroactivity in Administrative Law
  1991 SUP. CT. REV. (1991) · Supreme Court Review · 1991

• Interpretations of the First Amendment
  84 MICH. L. REV. 648 (1986) · Michigan Law Review · 1986
• Review Article
  84 MICH. L. REV. 648 (1986) · Michigan Law Review · 1986