US Tech Workers v. CohesionIB, Inc.

OCAHO

Type: published

Decided: 4/24/2025

Topics: unfair immigration-related employment practices (8 U.S.C. 1324b)

Bluebook Citation: US Tech Workers v. CohesionIB, Inc., 21 OCAHO no. 1661 (OCAHO 2025)

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE EXECUTIVE OFFICE FOR IMMIGRATION REVIEW OFFICE OF THE CHIEF ADMINISTRATIVE HEARING OFFICER 21 OCAHO no. 1661 US TECH WORKERS ET AL, Complainant, v. COHESIONIB, INC., Respondent. April 24, 2025 8 U.S.C. § 1324b Proceeding OCAHO Case No. 2025B00003 Appearances: John M. Miano, Esq., for Complainant Leon Rodriguez, Esq., and Dawn Lurie, Esq., for Respondent ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO AMEND COMPLAINT & SCHEDULING INITIAL PREHEARING CONFERENCE This case arises under the antidiscrimination provisions of the Immigration and Nationality Act, as amended, 8 U.S.C. § 1324b. Complainant, US Tech Workers et al., filed a complaint with the Office of the Chief Administrative Hearing Officer (OCAHO) against Respondent, CohesionIB, Inc., on October 9, 2024. On January 13, 2025, Respondent filed its answer.

On March 31, 2025, Complainant filed a Motion to Recaption First Amended Complaint, requesting to remove one complainant from the case caption who no longer wishes to participate in the action and to strike paragraphs of the Complaint pertaining to that individual. Mot. Recaption 1–2. Respondent did not file an opposition.

The Court first notes that no First Amended Complaint exists in this matter, and so it will construe Complainant’s filing as a motion to amend the complaint. Under 28 C.F.R. § 68.9(e), a complainant may amend a complaint “[if] a determination of a controversy on the merits will be facilitated thereby” and “upon such conditions as are necessary to avoid prejudicing the public interest and the rights of the parties[.]” 21 OCAHO no. 1661 The motion notes the proposed amendment reflects the desire of one named Complainant to cease participation in the case. Such a revision through an amendment would facilitate the adjudication of this matter (as it would mean the record accurately reflects the individuals pursuing the claim). Respondent has not opposed the amendment, and so the Court finds it will not be prejudiced.

Complainant’s Motion to Amend is GRANTED. Complainant may file an Amended Complaint, and must do so by May 9, 2025. Respondent shall have until June 13, 2025 to file an Amended Answer. The Court will also hold an initial prehearing conference in this matter on August 12, 2025, at 12:00pm EST.

The parties shall attend the conference by dialing ##### and using conference room number ##### and security code #####.

SO ORDERED.

Dated and entered on April 24, 2025. __________________________________ Honorable Andrea R. Carroll-Tipton Administrative Law Judge 2

Chat with this agency decision using AI

Ask CiteLaw's AI Navigator anything about this agency decision, verify citations, and research related authorities. Sign up for CiteLaw free today to get started.