United States v. Wilde

1 OCAHO 213 UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE EXECUTIVE OFFICE FOR IMMIGRATION REVIEW OFFICE OF THE CHIEF ADMINISTRATIVE HEARING OFFICER United States of America, Complainant vs. Daniel Fenton Wilde, Individually, and d/b/a Danny Wilde Farm, Respondent; 8 U.S.C. 1324a Proceeding; Case No. 90100093.

ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO COMPEL

On June 27, 1990, Respondent was ordered to show cause on or before July 16, 1990, why Complainant's Motion to Compel Answers to Complainant's First Set of Interrogatories should not be granted. Having received no response from Respondent, Complainant's Motion is hereby granted, and Respondent is ordered to respond to Complainant's discovery request forthwith. Failure to respond may lead to the imposition of sanctions, as provided for in 28 C.F.R. 68.21(c).

SO ORDERED.

Dated: July 30, 1990, San Francisco, CA.

JAY R. POLLACK

Administrative Law Judge 1435