United States v. Sotelo

OCAHO

Type: published

Decided: 3/12/1997

Topics: document fraud (8 U.S.C. 1324c)

Bluebook Citation: United States v. Sotelo, 6 OCAHO no. 921 (OCAHO 1997)

6 OCAHO 921 UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE EXECUTIVE OFFICE FOR IMMIGRATION REVIEW OFFICE OF THE CHIEF ADMINISTRATIVE HEARING OFFICER March 12, 1997 v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Complainant , 8 U.S.C. §1324c Proceeding ) Case No. 96C00053 EDUARDO SOTELO, A/K/A EDUARDO SOTELO- MONTES, Respondent. ORDER OF DISMISSAL—SETTLED On May 17, 1996, complainant, acting by and through the Immigration and Naturalization Service (INS), commenced this ac- tion by having filed a Complaint with the Office of the Chief Administrative Hearing Officer, alleging that the respondent, Eduardo Sotelo, committed document fraud in violation of section 274C(a)(2) of the Immigration and Nationality Act, 8 U.S.C. §1324c(a)(2). On February 18, 1997, the parties jointly filed a Motion to Dismiss, together with a fully executed four (4) page Settlement Agreement, in which they advised that they had reached a compro- mise settlement of all matters in controversy. Under §68.14(a) of the OCAHO Rules of Practice and Procedure, where the parties have entered into a proposed settlement agree- ment and have notified the administrative law judge, a final dis- missal of the action is subject to approval of the terms of the settle- ment agreement by the administrative law judge.

1212 6 OCAHO 921 Upon a careful and thorough review of the Settlement Agreement, it is found that the terms set forth therein are fair and reasonable and constitute an appropriate settlement pursuant to §68.14(a). Accordingly, it is found that: 1. Respondent has withdrawn his request for hearing on the merits; and 2. That respondent will pay a civil money penalty in the total amount of $450.00 in the manner set forth in the Settlement Agreement; and 3.

That it is appropriate to grant the parties’ joint Motion to Dismiss based upon the parties’ notification made pursuant to §68.14(a)(2); and4. That com- plainant’s May 17, 1996 Complaint is hereby ordered to be and is dismissed with prejudice to refiling.

JOSEPH E. MCGUIRE

Administrative Law Judge 1213

Chat with this agency decision using AI

Ask CiteLaw's AI Navigator anything about this agency decision, verify citations, and research related authorities. Sign up for CiteLaw free today to get started.